As reported, Pat pushed for Stamkos and Marchessault. Obviously came up short, but I'm fine with that. Would not be happy with any of those contracts, plus pretty sure we'd have to pay more
We have no idea if we even offered some of these guys similar deals.Well, regardless of our difference of opinion, they all chose to sign elsewhere. So you’re saying we should have just outbid everybody?
Well, either we were prudent or we would have had to overpay by more $ and/or term than the deals they signed. With 20/20 hindsight I'm more than pleased we didn’t sign any of the guys most people wanted.We have no idea if we even offered some of these guys similar deals.
Cronin: I coach this lad named Seamus McNulty from Boston, he's now in a boston beer league we should really sign him I swear he's a good lad who backs up his team in a fight.Or Old Man Cronin coached him like 12 years ago in college, the ahl, or some other lower league.
Im pretty surprised at how ok everyone is at the prospect of likely being a bottom of the barrel team again next year.
I was all for a tear-it-down rebuild, and I think Verbeek has done a good job of that thus far.
However, I truly believed that this was the year we started to make a push. We have a great cupboard of youth/prospects, I thought now would be the time we began trying in earnest to win and get the young guys accustomed to that, rather then them only seeing a losing culture. Sure we will fill out the roster and get some guys, but I don’t see us trading high prospects or picks to add actual difference makers. On the plus side we have tons of cap space, so that’s super fun. When we are in the lottery again we can run it in everyone’s face how much cap flexibility we have.
Is it your money? What good is the cap space if we don’t use it? Do we have like a ton of young studs we need to sign to big money deals in next couple years I don’t know about? Even if we did, we have tons of space.Well, either we were prudent or we would have had to overpay by more $ and/or term than the deals they signed. With 20/20 hindsight I'm more than pleased we didn’t sign any of the guys most people wanted.
Nonsense. Of course adding those guys could change our position in the standings. They are good hockey players. Good hockey players help you win.Today didn't nor was it ever going to decide our place in the standings. That will come down to the kind of progression we get from Z/Leo/McT/Minty/Zell/etc. If the kids take big leaps we'll be better. If they don't we won't. Signing Roy and Marchessault would not have changed that.
It's easier to be ok with things when you don't assume the worst. It's a long offseason. And I have no reason to believe, as you seem to, that Verbeek is unwilling to trade high prospects or picks. Particularly given he did that last year when he traded Drysdale for Gauthier.Im pretty surprised at how ok everyone is at the prospect of likely being a bottom of the barrel team again next year.
I was all for a tear-it-down rebuild, and I think Verbeek has done a good job of that thus far.
However, I truly believed that this was the year we started to make a push. We have a great cupboard of youth/prospects, I thought now would be the time we began trying in earnest to win and get the young guys accustomed to that, rather then them only seeing a losing culture. Sure we will fill out the roster and get some guys, but I don’t see us trading high prospects or picks to add actual difference makers. On the plus side we have tons of cap space, so that’s super fun. When we are in the lottery again we can run it in everyone’s face how much cap flexibility we have.
He just should've just never said anything imo, and he said it twice, so criticism will come with that territory of perceived failure. Not that he should care as long as he has support.again, what exactly did some of you expect verbeek to do? overpay for mediocre talent? he can't exactly force guys like stamkos and marchessault to come to anaheim either
Your example was a trade that made our NHL roster worse (in the short term).It's easier to be ok with things when you don't assume the worst. It's a long offseason. And I have no reason to believe, as you seem to, that Verbeek is unwilling to trade high prospects or picks. Particularly given he did that last year when he traded Drysdale for Gauthier.
I don't think today was the death knell for the 24-25 season. There's time.
Carlsson, McT, Gauthier, Zellweger, Dostal, Mintyukov.......quite a few young players due extensions in the next couple of seasons.Is it your money? What good is the cap space if we don’t use it? Do we have like a ton of young studs we need to sign to big money deals in next couple years I don’t know about? Even if we did, we have tons of space.
what did he say?He just should've just never said anything imo, and he said it twice, so criticism will come with that territory of perceived failure. Not that he should care as long as he has support.
But honestly we can take another "bad" contract or two like Killorn's or Strome's would have no affect on re-signing young players as the cap rises and guys like Fowler fade away right as Minty and Zell may or may not get paid. It genuinely doesn't matter unless we're handing out massive contracts to McT, Gauthier, and Leo. Fans just want to send them a lifejacket so they don't toil at the bottom of the Pacific until they're worth those contracts.
Carlsson, McT, Gauthier, Zellweger, Dostal, Mintyukov.......quite a few young players due extensions in the next couple of seasons.
Vatrano is also a pending UFA who we might potentially want to extend.
Yeah it feels like there are some people simultaniously in the "Strome is overpaid AF", and "Screw Pat for not doing anything on FA day" boats, lol. But in all seeiousness they're not THAT many. Large majority seems to understand things are not as easyThe same people here bitching about him not signing an impact player are the same ones who would be bitching about the contract he would’ve had to offer to get them to sign.
It’s obvious he would’ve had to offer more than what they probably signed for. A lot of people seem to forget that the “free” in free agent means that these players are free to choose where to play and don’t have to accept your offer.
That he wanted a top-6 forward and top-4 defenseman like we all know. The second time, at the flock party, he sounded less confident but still said it to a bunch of die hard fans who showed up to see some rookies.what did he say?
and that doesn't mean that he didn't try to land a top 6 forward and top 4 d-man but got denied. of course he's going to say something optimistic to the fanbase. was he supposed to say "i'm going to try and sign a couple big name FAs but will likely get turned down because our team isn't very good and i can't afford to pay what other teams will"?That he wanted a top-6 forward and top-4 defenseman like we all know. The second time, at the flock party, he sounded less confident but still said it to a bunch of die hard fans who showed up to see some rookies.
Also to be clear, he said he wanted to be competing for playoffs late in the season due to such moves.
So it sounds like you would have been happy signing the guys who would sign here (that’s not Stammer or Marshy), to fat bloated 7 year deals because they would potentially help us win a few more games in the next couple of years. OK, fine. I wouldn’t have been.Is it your money? What good is the cap space if we don’t use it? Do we have like a ton of young studs we need to sign to big money deals in next couple years I don’t know about? Even if we did, we have tons of space.