He was absolutely Chelsea’s POTY that season, which is the award that he won. To prove it wasn’t a fluke, he was Chelsea’s POTY the next season too!I understand it is two separate awards, I was just complaining about how the best player doesn't normally always win. Same case with Mount, nobody here honestly thinks or believes he is a POTY candidate, even if he won it in the CL. Fluke stuff happens all the time.
He had one good season and won some rubbish stuff. He is the Jonathan Cheechoo of the EPL.I don’t see how Mount being underwhelming now has anything to do with how good he was a few years ago. Objectively he was just really good at Chelsea.
three good years on teams with zero attackersHe had one good season and won some rubbish stuff. He is the Jonathan Cheechoo of the EPL.
what incentive do we have to unjustly praise a player who chased the bag away from the club that made himNo need to overly praise him anymore.
Who was also just objectively good for a few seasons.Mount is the new Dele Alli.
Who was also just objectively good for a few seasons.
Yeah bringing Mount in under ETH made no sense based on the formation he was playing. Ironically though ETH’s replacement had a system that was tailor made to utilize Mount. I’m not going to say Mount was going to get back to his Chelsea form under Amorim, but there were a lot of flashes of him rounding back into an effective level. Unfortunately he’s just getting into Shaw territory with the injuries.Whether or not Mount was overrated his purchase was still a stupid one from united. He filled no glaring hole and plenty of people said it didn’t make sense, they were proven to be right on the nose. Also considering how Chelsea loves spending, one can’t help but think they knew he was damaged goods and didn’t want to over pay him on wages. Some critical thinking from united’s fo, who I can only assume make millions to do their job were bent over on this one. It’s a fireable offence.