Toggle sidebar

2024-25 EPL Season

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
les Habs said:
I absolutely can extrapolate as I’ve done and it’s relevant, unlike largely every argument you’ve made on this subject, because you yourself referenced Ajax’s league season goals which they scored in 34 matches. So in essence you held Antony accountable to 34 matches despite the fact that he only played in 20 matches worth of minutes. So extrapolating absolutely makes sense, but you can look at it another way as well.

Without taking the time to inspect that season match by match I’ll just use averages based on the actual numbers. So Ajax scored 102 goals in 20-21 in of course 34 matches. Antony only played in 20 matches worth of minutes though. So based on the average of 3 goals per match that Ajax scored, you get 60 goals in 20 matches. So of those 60 goals, Antony scored 9. Either way, it’s not 9 goals out of 102, it’s more like 9 goals out of 60.

Again, European matches are irrelevant because your original post which I quoted twice was in reference to Holland.

I could care less. I don’t like the player and have already stated that I was embarrassed I drafted him and I don’t really rate the player. Anyway, it’s good that you know that La Liga is a top two league in the World. I’d recommend you watch it.
Click to expand...
It's relevant to compare somebody playing 90 minutes of all games to players playing not every minute of every game to try to boast inflated goal numbers? Sure, in your head at least.

I made two arguments that you just can't counter :
1/ How do you play 32 games as one of 3 forwards and come up with less than 10% of the goals of your team and yet people still come to defend you here?
2/ How do you play 10 european games and come up with a 1+0 stat sheet and some people still defend you here?

So you can try to add minutes in training if you want, there's simply no defending the above stats.

I mean, we all know why you do, but that's ok.
 
Savant said:
Yes. Losing a toe is better than losing a foot
Click to expand...
otis-wwe.gif
 
Arsenal has posted a 17.7 million pound loss even with making record revenue this season, attributed much of that to player wages boosts. So, I think that explains why we sold so many HG talent last season and why we didn't buy anybody this window. I guess we're going to have to clean up some of these wages in the summer and why so many players are rumoured to be leaving even for an EPL/CL title contender.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Jussi
S E P H said:
Arsenal has posted a 17.7 million pound loss even with making record revenue this season, attributed much of that to player wages boosts. So, I think that explains why we sold so many HG talent last season and why we didn't buy anybody this window. I guess we're going to have to clean up some of these wages in the summer and why so many players are rumoured to be leaving even for an EPL/CL title contender.
Click to expand...

I’m not worried. The revenue increased by more than 150 million from previous year.
 
Evilo said:
It's relevant to compare somebody playing 90 minutes of all games to players playing not every minute of every game to try to boast inflated goal numbers? Sure, in your head at least.

I made two arguments that you just can't counter :
1/ How do you play 32 games as one of 3 forwards and come up with less than 10% of the goals of your team and yet people still come to defend you here?
2/ How do you play 10 european games and come up with a 1+0 stat sheet and some people still defend you here?

So you can try to add minutes in training if you want, there's simply no defending the above stats.

I mean, we all know why you do, but that's ok.
Click to expand...

You simply can’t understand the numbers. Not sure why.

1/. Not sure when you’re referring to and it’s not at all relevant to what I quoted you saying.
2/. Again, irrelevant. Still, as I’ve already said, you can bang on about him in Europe all you want. The problem here is that is has nothing to do with your original post that I quoted.

As for the next bit, not even sure what you mean there. At the end the of the day, you made a ridiculous claim that was 100% false. It wasn’t even remotely true. I and others noted it, commented on it. Yet you keep digging the whole even deeper while at the same time misrepresenting figures and moving the goalposts over and over and over again. In the end you said “He even score in Holland” which is completely false and there is literally zero argument you can make to back that up. Yet due to whatever (I won’t insult you and speculate) you keep going on about it. Well congrats on being wrong yet again.
 
Tomiyasu is done for the season. Got injured in preseason, came back and played only six minutes, got injured again, just had surgery, and now he has to rehab the entire summer.
 
les Habs said:
You simply can’t understand the numbers. Not sure why.

1/. Not sure when you’re referring to and it’s not at all relevant to what I quoted you saying.
2/. Again, irrelevant. Still, as I’ve already said, you can bang on about him in Europe all you want. The problem here is that is has nothing to do with your original post that I quoted.

As for the next bit, not even sure what you mean there. At the end the of the day, you made a ridiculous claim that was 100% false. It wasn’t even remotely true. I and others noted it, commented on it. Yet you keep digging the whole even deeper while at the same time misrepresenting figures and moving the goalposts over and over and over again. In the end you said “He even score in Holland” which is completely false and there is literally zero argument you can make to back that up. Yet due to whatever (I won’t insult you and speculate) you keep going on about it. Well congrats on being wrong yet again.
Click to expand...
I love how I "misrepresent numbers" and "move the goalposts" when you had to resort to extrapolate on how many goals Antony would have scored if he had played every minute of every game.
Self awareness much?
We're back to square one. You can't deny the two stats I gave. They're not "what if stats", they're simple cold hard facts, not extrapolations.
So you're wrong, not the first time and again you're the only one with an agenda.
 
spintheblackcircle said:
www.espn.com

Sources: INEOS in talks to end Spurs sponsorship

Manchester United's co-owners INEOS are in talks with Tottenham to end their sponsorship agreement with the club earlier than planned, sources have told ESPN.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
Click to expand...
Watching the last match I noticed that the chairs on the sideline said "INEOS Grenadiers", which seemed weird. Not because of INEOS per-se (although that's kind of strange in itself) but that's the name of the cycling team that INEOS owns. Kind of strange to advertise a cycling team (albeit a British one) at a football match.
 
Last edited:
Jack Straw said:
Watching the last match I noticed that the chairs on the sideline said "INEOS Grenadiers", which seemed weird. Not because of INEOS per-se (although that's kind of strange in itself) but that's the name of the cycling team that INEOS owns. Kind of strange to a cycling team (albeit a British one) at a football match.
Click to expand...

Ratcliffe seems like a ratf***

sports.yahoo.com

New Zealand Rugby launches lawsuit against Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Ineos

Ineos has withdrawn from a six-year contract three years early, says NZR
sports.yahoo.com sports.yahoo.com
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jack Straw
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom