wouldnt be the best pick management but truthfully i wouldnt complain about any of them in the 2nd. realistically though, amico might be the only one youd have to go top 64 on. the rest would have a decent shot to go later being a mix of overagers, undervalued profiles, or russiansGreat list!! Which picks would you consider for these players - our 2nd? Edmonton's? Or third/fourth round swings?
We targeted him all the season, because big part of our Russian Devils community are from Minsk. He was good all the season. Yes he is overages but he is showing as good or better results you would like to see from a player of his age. It’s just a skip with evidence. When you are drafting player you have to hope he will develop on the same path as Borikov already did.
- borikov (LW): (cheating because guadana mentioned him first, but a great call) outstanding scoring instincts, both in terms of knowing when to pop open at the right time and how to spot seams to target. great recoverability on attempts, can quickly pivot into passing looks or spinoffs to keep play alive. not quite fast, but a very fluid and steady skater who can change directions quickly. competes on the defensive end as well, backchecks and employs his defensive stick to disrupt. maybe just a flash in the pan, but some tremendous khl success for the double overager, most of which came in the second half of the season
Paupanekis is not a player I would draft with the Devils 2nd round picks, I'd prefer to go more dynamic there with a guy like Zharovsky or Murtagh. However Paupanekis is exactly the type of player I'd be looking for in Rounds 3/4.About players I do like.
I was critical to Paupanekis. And from the time my thoughts are close to what I said before. But... he is sneaky good on my taste. May be he isnt very creative with the puck, as a driver. But without the puck he is always know where he should be, cover a lot of ice, skates really well. He is very accurate and involved defensively.
And may be his IQ is better than we thought. I would like how he will develop on a better team with the time. May be he needs to polish his offensive game for one more year.
He is big but you dont actually see it. But its not bad in his case. When you are watching the game of Lewandowski you see his size, how he is skating only on verticals mostly. Paupanekis is a big center who is moving like a 6'0, can start to make a fast step right in the second. And his hands are really good too. He is good positional two way center who is cover a lot of ice and his hands and stick helps him to prevent passes, shots and close gaps.
Player who is so good positionally who reads the game so well... I just dont believe that he doesnt have little more offensive gear. I think he has a chance to be available, unlike Ryabkin or Nilson or McKinney or Zharovsky. And I would like to see him as a pick in this case. At least he is on my "please pick him" list. He has all the tools to be NHLer already.
My dream trade-up scenario is that one of two players who could possibly fall to the 2nd round -- Cole Reschny and/or Bill Zonnon -- make their way into the 30s and Fitzgerald moves up to grab them.If Fitz is really want him he can try to trade up, not trade down to make more useless picks.
2025 Draft Profile:
LD Sasha Boumedienne, Boston University NCAA
A likely pick in the back half of the 1st round, Boumedienne might be the most inherently contradictory player in the 2025 NHL Draft class. Born in Finland and raised mostly in the USA but a Swedish national, Boumedienne frustrates any attempt to pin him down. With an NHL-ready 6'2-185 frame, excellent skating ability and one of the best offensive tool-kits in the class among blueliners, Boumedienne's proponents rave about the obvious possibilities. But with a penchant for maddening blunders which lead to goals against and coaches and fans scratching their heads, he has also created a bit of dichotomy in his consensus rankings. Boumedienne has been ranked in the top 15 and at the very end of Round 2, and both of these arguments have legitimate points.
When Boumedienne is on, boy is he on. He has the strength to win battles in his own zone, and the skill to quickly transition to offense, whether with high-end passes or using some nimble feet and deft hands to carry the puck himself. Once in the offensive zone, Boumedienne's absolute bomb of a shot is a constant concern for the opposition -- and Boumedienne gets it off quickly and accurately with an economical, fast-twitch release. A good shift by Boumedienne immediately gives one glimpses of an extremely strong and athletic, all-situations two-way middle-pairing defender at the highest levels.
Unfortunately, sometimes that good shift is immediately followed by a distastrous one. Boumedienne is prone to losing his gaps against speedy opposing forwards and can get spun around by a good set of hands. Consistent pressure in his defensive zone can completely break down his positioning and when he is under great pressure, he can be forced into some brain-lock plays with the puck.
Though we see good-Boumedienne far more than bad-Boumedienne, you'd really like more consistency, especially from a defenseman. If you feel these are problems which can be ironed out, this kid is certainly worth a top 25 pick. His frame, skating and skills are all high-end, and his hockey IQ is quite good until the adversity bar deflates things. It's not a character issue either, Boumedienne is a hard worker. This is a player who clearly has the ability to mature and emerge into a terrific NHL defender, but how high a team drafts him is dependent on how scared they are about the appreciable risk associated with a penchant for mistakes.
His pop scored our first goal of the season in 2001 in the only game he ever played for NJ. I only remember him because it was so random.Didn’t we draft Sascha Boumedienne already? Wasn’t that his father ?
Orrrrr some 6'4 20 year olds to fill depth roles in the AHL haha.Haven't focused too much on thr Draft this year but I'm going to lock in and read up/watch some stuff. Our scouts will have their work cut out for themselves like any other draft year.
Here's to hoping they can find us some magic on the later rounds![]()
not to overstep guadana but thats a player ill have toward the end of my board, very much agree with your projection. its funny, theres nothing overtly impressive about his profile, but at the risk of sounding cliche, he really does play the right way lol sometimes looks like a defender dropping back to defend against the rush. really like his commitment to playing through contact to get in on the forecheck. strong physical instinctsQuick question for @Guadana -- what are your feelings on RW Alexander Pershakov out of Novosibirsk? I think he's gone a bit under the radar because he's a do-everything but be-dynamic-at-nothing kind of player, but I feel he has a very solid floor as a bottom 6 guy and he's also got a bit of a nice scoring touch.
Sounds similar to what was said about Hameenahonot to overstep guadana but thats a player ill have toward the end of my board, very much agree with your projection. its funny, theres nothing overtly impressive about his profile, but at the risk of sounding cliche, he really does play the right way lol sometimes looks like a defender dropping back to defend against the rush. really like his commitment to playing through contact to get in on the forecheck. strong physical instincts
Still digesting Bob's ranking, some knee jerk thoughts:
- Matthew Gard (#50) - Cam Robinson doesn't think there's a big gap between Gard and Jack Nesbitt (#17) as he's seen on other lists. He thinks both guys project to be bottom six centers.
- Three Russian goalies ranked 57-59. I know we're all optimistic about Big Mike, but maybe another goalie as a value play wouldn't be the worst idea. I forget which podcast it was, but somebody noted that the expectation would be that the goalies might go earlier in the 2nd just because the skaters have limited upside. Robinson noted that he'd heard a couple teams who gave Semyon Frolov a first round grade.
- Mason West (#46) - Committed to Michigan State for 2026, but I wonder if NHL teams are still worried about football being a viable option. West (like Anders Lee) is a high school QB who was getting some scholarship offers from some lower end D1 programs. Him going to Michigan State might rule out football for now. But West is going back for his senior year of high school, so things could change over the next six months. Lee seemingly dropped in his draft year because of football.