I keep wanting to describe Brady Martin as a pre-concussion Todd Harvey. It must have been early in my hockey fandom but I remember watching an ESPN game and Harvey obliterated some defenseman with a clean hit that forever left an impression.
#64 Theo Stockselius, C
Commentary
The Devils add Stockselius, a good-sized forward who was very productive on a talented J20 team playing with good players, and also showed he could play with good players in more of a support role with the Swedish national team this year. — Wheeler
Does someone have any information about these players?
still hammering out my own rankings so i dont quite have the ability to compare placements yet but at first glance these picks seem ok. not really tom picks but lolPronman and Wheeler predicted all 64 picks of the first two rounds. The Devils' picks were:
#50 Alexander Zharovsky, RW
Commentary
The Devils add Zharovsky, a highly skilled winger who was one of the top young forwards in the MHL this season. With the right patience, his talent could deliver value in the late second. — Wheeler
#64 Theo Stockselius, C
Commentary
The Devils add Stockselius, a good-sized forward who was very productive on a talented J20 team playing with good players, and also showed he could play with good players in more of a support role with the Swedish national team this year. — Wheeler
Does someone have any information about these players?
![]()
NHL Mock Draft 2025: Predicting all 64 picks of the first two rounds with Pronman and Wheeler
How will the first two rounds of the 2025 NHL Draft shake out? Corey Pronman and Scott Wheeler alternate picks in this mock.www.nytimes.com
Thanks for the answer. I look forward to your final rankings and who the Devils' potential 2nd round picks are.still hammering out my own rankings so i dont quite have the ability to compare placements yet but at first glance these picks seem ok. not really tom picks but lol
so with zharovsky, if we're talking just raw skill and talent level, thats pretty tremendous value to land at pick 50. if you start digging into the full picture, though, then it does feel a bit more fair for him to go in that range. elite, elite handling ability. very evasive. deceptive. slick. hes a pretty imaginative player on the puck. now he can be reckless with it, too, but some of that is just experimentation because he flashes some pretty impressive vision and playmaking ideas at times. where we run into issue is...well, theres really no actual foundation here, just talent right now. the pace isnt particularly great, his skating in general has warts, the decision making is all over the place, the defensive contributions fringe on nonexistent, hes an opportunistic forechecker at best, i mean theres a tremendous amount of work that needs to be put into this player. ultimate talent project
some reason for optimisim would be that he still kinda torched the MHL in spite of all this, and it was his first year in the league as well (graduating from RUS U17) so he might just be very far back on the development curve at this point. to me, i wouldnt complain about this big of a talent swing on a stash and forget prospect (even if he isnt a center lol) because ive been begging for tom to make that type of pick. and, lets be real, our russian prospect trajectories consistently smash what we pull out of NA, so thats another positive. in this particular mock,, i wouldve been disappointed to see some of my favorites like nestrasil and lee go right before, and while i think some of the defenders who went after (amico, limatov, rombach) might be better overall prospects, if the goal was to land top forward talent, its fine
flipping over to stockselius, pretty different prospect. in his case, we're talking more of a play facilitator. he has some tremendous positional sense and anticipation. this is a player who is always where he needs to be to make a play, be it offensively or defensively. he sees lanes develop quite well and can make quick decisions with the puck. contrary to zharovksy, there really isnt anything remarkable about his playmaking per se, but its super efficient and hes good with getting pucks through triangles. his timing and defensive stick both stand out as well. he can be very disruptive off the puck and hes great at turning pokes/strips into opportunities for his linemates
on the more problematic side, well, its hard to say what you're betting on with the player. hes not particularly skilled, a lot of his play with the puck is just quick connections (as opposed to longer carries) so its not like a lot of his points are off beating defenders or finding high danger chances, its opportunistic positioning and jump starting sequences for his linemates to do most of the work. for a player like him, i like to say his size is cosmetic in a way. outside of using his reach to keep position, there really is next to no benefit to him being 6'3" right now. his skating/pace isnt too great, his intensity/compete isnt too great. not problematic, just not a strength. so youre betting on basically just reads and instincts and quick decisions with the hope that the rest of the toolkit will fill out (which, hey, we did that before on a pretty solid prospect playing in the worlds right now). fortunately, stockselius is fairly lanky and young for the class, so youd expect some growth potential down the road
still hammering out my own rankings so i dont quite have the ability to compare placements yet but at first glance these picks seem ok. not really tom picks but lol
so with zharovsky, if we're talking just raw skill and talent level, thats pretty tremendous value to land at pick 50. if you start digging into the full picture, though, then it does feel a bit more fair for him to go in that range. elite, elite handling ability. very evasive. deceptive. slick. hes a pretty imaginative player on the puck. now he can be reckless with it, too, but some of that is just experimentation because he flashes some pretty impressive vision and playmaking ideas at times. where we run into issue is...well, theres really no actual foundation here, just talent right now. the pace isnt particularly great, his skating in general has warts, the decision making is all over the place, the defensive contributions fringe on nonexistent, hes an opportunistic forechecker at best, i mean theres a tremendous amount of work that needs to be put into this player. ultimate talent project
some reason for optimisim would be that he still kinda torched the MHL in spite of all this, and it was his first year in the league as well (graduating from RUS U17) so he might just be very far back on the development curve at this point. to me, i wouldnt complain about this big of a talent swing on a stash and forget prospect (even if he isnt a center lol) because ive been begging for tom to make that type of pick. and, lets be real, our russian prospect trajectories consistently smash what we pull out of NA, so thats another positive. in this particular mock,, i wouldve been disappointed to see some of my favorites like nestrasil and lee go right before, and while i think some of the defenders who went after (amico, limatov, rombach) might be better overall prospects, if the goal was to land top forward talent, its fine
flipping over to stockselius, pretty different prospect. in his case, we're talking more of a play facilitator. he has some tremendous positional sense and anticipation. this is a player who is always where he needs to be to make a play, be it offensively or defensively. he sees lanes develop quite well and can make quick decisions with the puck. contrary to zharovksy, there really isnt anything remarkable about his playmaking per se, but its super efficient and hes good with getting pucks through triangles. his timing and defensive stick both stand out as well. he can be very disruptive off the puck and hes great at turning pokes/strips into opportunities for his linemates
on the more problematic side, well, its hard to say what you're betting on with the player. hes not particularly skilled, a lot of his play with the puck is just quick connections (as opposed to longer carries) so its not like a lot of his points are off beating defenders or finding high danger chances, its opportunistic positioning and jump starting sequences for his linemates to do most of the work. for a player like him, i like to say his size is cosmetic in a way. outside of using his reach to keep position, there really is next to no benefit to him being 6'3" right now. his skating/pace isnt too great, his intensity/compete isnt too great. not problematic, just not a strength. so youre betting on basically just reads and instincts and quick decisions with the hope that the rest of the toolkit will fill out (which, hey, we did that before on a pretty solid prospect playing in the worlds right now). fortunately, stockselius is fairly lanky and young for the class, so youd expect some growth potential down the road
I hope whoever they pick can skate well. The league is getting faster every year. I’m not sure Fitz realizes that’s an issue since he seems focused too much on size/strength
still hammering out my own rankings so i dont quite have the ability to compare placements yet but at first glance these picks seem ok. not really tom picks but lol
so with zharovsky, if we're talking just raw skill and talent level, thats pretty tremendous value to land at pick 50. if you start digging into the full picture, though, then it does feel a bit more fair for him to go in that range. elite, elite handling ability. very evasive. deceptive. slick. hes a pretty imaginative player on the puck. now he can be reckless with it, too, but some of that is just experimentation because he flashes some pretty impressive vision and playmaking ideas at times. where we run into issue is...well, theres really no actual foundation here, just talent right now. the pace isnt particularly great, his skating in general has warts, the decision making is all over the place, the defensive contributions fringe on nonexistent, hes an opportunistic forechecker at best, i mean theres a tremendous amount of work that needs to be put into this player. ultimate talent project
some reason for optimisim would be that he still kinda torched the MHL in spite of all this, and it was his first year in the league as well (graduating from RUS U17) so he might just be very far back on the development curve at this point. to me, i wouldnt complain about this big of a talent swing on a stash and forget prospect (even if he isnt a center lol) because ive been begging for tom to make that type of pick. and, lets be real, our russian prospect trajectories consistently smash what we pull out of NA, so thats another positive. in this particular mock,, i wouldve been disappointed to see some of my favorites like nestrasil and lee go right before, and while i think some of the defenders who went after (amico, limatov, rombach) might be better overall prospects, if the goal was to land top forward talent, its fine
flipping over to stockselius, pretty different prospect. in his case, we're talking more of a play facilitator. he has some tremendous positional sense and anticipation. this is a player who is always where he needs to be to make a play, be it offensively or defensively. he sees lanes develop quite well and can make quick decisions with the puck. contrary to zharovksy, there really isnt anything remarkable about his playmaking per se, but its super efficient and hes good with getting pucks through triangles. his timing and defensive stick both stand out as well. he can be very disruptive off the puck and hes great at turning pokes/strips into opportunities for his linemates
on the more problematic side, well, its hard to say what you're betting on with the player. hes not particularly skilled, a lot of his play with the puck is just quick connections (as opposed to longer carries) so its not like a lot of his points are off beating defenders or finding high danger chances, its opportunistic positioning and jump starting sequences for his linemates to do most of the work. for a player like him, i like to say his size is cosmetic in a way. outside of using his reach to keep position, there really is next to no benefit to him being 6'3" right now. his skating/pace isnt too great, his intensity/compete isnt too great. not problematic, just not a strength. so youre betting on basically just reads and instincts and quick decisions with the hope that the rest of the toolkit will fill out (which, hey, we did that before on a pretty solid prospect playing in the worlds right now). fortunately, stockselius is fairly lanky and young for the class, so youd expect some growth potential down the road
Pronman and Wheeler predicted all 64 picks of the first two rounds. The Devils' picks were:
#50 Alexander Zharovsky, RW
Commentary
The Devils add Zharovsky, a highly skilled winger who was one of the top young forwards in the MHL this season. With the right patience, his talent could deliver value in the late second. — Wheeler
#64 Theo Stockselius, C
Commentary
The Devils add Stockselius, a good-sized forward who was very productive on a talented J20 team playing with good players, and also showed he could play with good players in more of a support role with the Swedish national team this year. — Wheeler
Does someone have any information about these players?
![]()
NHL Mock Draft 2025: Predicting all 64 picks of the first two rounds with Pronman and Wheeler
How will the first two rounds of the 2025 NHL Draft shake out? Corey Pronman and Scott Wheeler alternate picks in this mock.www.nytimes.com
I see Zharovsky has a team mate that is listed at 116 lb's on Hockey DB.Pronman and Wheeler predicted all 64 picks of the first two rounds. The Devils' picks were:
#50 Alexander Zharovsky, RW
Commentary
The Devils add Zharovsky, a highly skilled winger who was one of the top young forwards in the MHL this season. With the right patience, his talent could deliver value in the late second. — Wheeler
#64 Theo Stockselius, C
Commentary
The Devils add Stockselius, a good-sized forward who was very productive on a talented J20 team playing with good players, and also showed he could play with good players in more of a support role with the Swedish national team this year. — Wheeler
Does someone have any information about these players?
![]()
NHL Mock Draft 2025: Predicting all 64 picks of the first two rounds with Pronman and Wheeler
How will the first two rounds of the 2025 NHL Draft shake out? Corey Pronman and Scott Wheeler alternate picks in this mock.www.nytimes.com
You still should try to target talent in the second round. This is how Devils drafted Casey and Hameenaho. Between similar talent Devils should draft center of course, but if they see something better available - they should draft more talented player in their view.I want a center(s) drafted in Round 2. It will be continued gross negligence if Fitzgerald and company don’t start to stock the cupboard to adddess our biggest organizational weakness.
I want a center(s) drafted in Round 2. It will be continued gross negligence if Fitzgerald and company don’t start to stock the cupboard to adddess our biggest organizational weakness.
Oh, I 100% agree with you. If all things are considered relatively equal, I want us taking centers. However, BPA is the way I’d always go otherwise.You still should try to target talent in the second round. This is how Devils drafted Casey and Hameenaho. Between similar talent Devils should draft center of course, but if they see something better available - they should draft more talented player in their view.
I believe every Devils fan will prefer center. But more often it’s harder to find better center in the late second round.
2025 Draft Profile:
LD Jackson Smith, Tri-City WHL
Every draft one is sure to find multiple potential high-level defensemen who are overlooked or underrated by multiple draft evaluators simply because they play a responsible game conscious of defensive responsibility and, as such, do not put up the video game numbers some like to see in high-ranking draft eligibles. Jackson Smith is absolutely the prototype of this player in 2025.
Jackson Smith has every high-level aspect a top-of-the-roster NHL defenseman could possibly need. He's an extremely big kid at 6'3-190 who also plays big -- he's physical, competitive and fearless. Jackson is an outstanding skater, I'd say just shy of elite. The obvious benefit of a kid mixing this type of high-end size, strength and athleticism makes him a pretty surefire bet to be an NHL player -- there is not a lot of risk and a very high floor here.
Jackson is a defense-first defender, and one of the best rush defenders I've seen in the past decade. His gaps and positioning are excellent, and his defensive IQ is quite high. He does not lose one-on-one puck battles, and he takes any high-danger scoring chance by the opposition very personally. He's a beast in the crease and stands up for teammates. There is legitimate potential for Jackson to develop into one of the better shut-down defensemen at the professional level.
His offense is very good, though his development curve is far steeper in this respect. He's a good shooter and good passer, but we shouldn't be confusing him with Cale Maker in these respects. He's a surprisingly deft puckhandler and can pull out some eye-opening moves on occasion. His hands and feet work very well in tandem and he's not afraid to try to beat players one-on-one in the offensive zone. He likes to use his range and quick hands to zip across the blue line searching for seams to pass, shoot, or just take the puck to high danger areas himself. There is a lot more upside on the offensive side of the puck than his 11g-43a-54p in 68 games might indicate.
Jackson Smith is a high-compete, high-IQ, high-talent player who might not be elite at everything, but he lacks nothing. His learning curve has been monumental, especially on the offensive end, and especially when one considers he a fairly recent convert from forward to defense. This is a character player with no bust potential, he's as high-floor as you'll see. At the very worst, you'll draft a very big/fast shut-down type defender who also contributes a bit of offense. And if his offense continuous it's recent precipitous climb? Well, the sky is the limit. After the first few players are off the board in the 2025 draft, there's really no spot too early to draft Jackson Smith.
Makar shamakar….how much worse is he than Lane Hutson?