Speculation: 2024-25 Coaching/Management/Ownership

DuckDuckGetz

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,742
4,445
I don't think he's amazing coach, but he may have been trying new things and nobody could execute those things either. The point is, his forwards and PPs have had success in the past, and I don't think he's this awful coach.
I don't think there are any truly awful coaches in the NHL, to be honest. It just seems more likely to me that 1 person is the problem vs. 10 people all having problems.

On another note, I was looking back at our past PP% and was reminded that in the 20-21 season (Pre-Newell) we had a PP% of 8.94% lol. Just insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

Mr Rogers

Registered User
Jul 11, 2010
20,867
10,450
Calgary
I don't think there are any truly awful coaches in the NHL, to be honest. It just seems more likely to me that 1 person is the problem vs. 10 people all having problems.

On another note, I was looking back at our past PP% and was reminded that in the 20-21 season (Pre-Newell) we had a PP% of 8.94% lol. Just insane.
It can be difficult to get a bunch of guys to execute all at once if they aren't skilled enough, are inexperienced (which we've had a lot of) and don't have an aggressive PP mindset (Fowler). As somebody who's been around the pro game for a while, I wouldn't think he's just not thinking of certain strategies.

Again probably not the very best or most innovative, but i'm not willing to say he's the main reason we've struggled so much and would not be surprised if the Kings have a perfectly fine PP next year. It's much easier to fire one guy than several players.
 

DuckDuckGetz

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,742
4,445
It can be difficult to get a bunch of guys to execute all at once if they aren't skilled enough, are inexperienced (which we've had a lot of) and don't have an aggressive PP mindset (Fowler). As somebody who's been around the pro game for a while, I wouldn't think he's just not thinking of certain strategies.

Again probably not the very best or most innovative, but i'm not willing to say he's the main reason we've struggled so much and would not be surprised if the Kings have a perfectly fine PP next year. It's much easier to fire one guy than several players.
I definitely agree with your last point, and I don't think it's all on Brown.

But IMO we have enough skill, experience, and aggression (I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that Fowler isn't aggressive on the PP, considering he has around as many PPP as guys like OEL, Klingberg, and Gostisbehere who are all known for being offensive d-men) to have at least one competent powerplay unit. And yet the plan for at least 80% of the season was to have two incompetent units that stood around and did nothing.

Again, maybe he isn't that bad. But I don't think he's good lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smirnov2Chistov

Static

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2006
49,389
37,675
SoCal

giphy (9).gif
 

Bergey37

Registered User
May 19, 2019
967
1,047
I really like the orange 3rds with the mighty duck logo; my only issue is the black numbers are hard (for me at least) to make out on TV. Maybe white with black outline?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deuce22

Leonardo87

New York Rangers, Anaheim Ducks, and TMNT fan.
Sponsor
Dec 8, 2013
40,902
64,637
New York
So it sounds like it will be the Mighty Ducks logo, but with different coloring?
 

Firequacker

used wall of text! It's not very effective...
Jun 3, 2022
325
650
If they go with this, would you guys prefer black or orange home jerseys?
Black, and keep the orange thirds. The mock-ups of a black version that went around at the time usually looked great.
 

LePerilsofPerreault

Registered User
Mar 20, 2022
438
586
Tryna get away, man
Would you prefer the old colors with the webbed D or the new colors with the Mighty Ducks logo? IMO I think the logo is more important, if I had to pick one or the other.
Agree. Seeing the MD logo at center ice again will be glorious. Hopefully we can at least get eggplant as a permanent third at some point and pray that becomes main years and years from now by popular demand.
 

Goose of Reason

El Zilcho
May 1, 2013
9,718
9,439
Would you prefer the old colors with the webbed D or the new colors with the Mighty Ducks logo? IMO I think the logo is more important, if I had to pick one or the other.

It's honestly close for me, i was never a fan of our solid orange third jerseys but those white reverse retros with orange pants were things of beauty. Obviously the Mighty Ducks logo blows the D out of the water but the purple is the big selling point for me. There are no teams in the league rocking purple in their main kits, and i think as a result of growing up a Ducks fan, purple has just become my favourite colour. I think i like our 30th anniversary jerseys more than our white and orange reverse retros even though the logo is much worse. But it's close.

I'm a huge sucker for those orange pants though. I hope those are included in the new set.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad