Somewhere between.I don’t think he plays with Becks edge and 200 ft game…
Somewhere between.I don’t think he plays with Becks edge and 200 ft game…
Fait enough. Which elements of Becks game do you see? My bad for assuming and not askin firstSomewhere between.
It’s quite comparable to Caufield’s freshman year which was very very good but had its warts. Hage played a tougher position and had arguably less help than Caufield. I’d argue that Hage looked more dynamic.Thank you. This is what I want - an unbiased opinion that confirms his season was far from being as incredible as people make it out to be
Hage has a higher ceiling but a lower floor than Beck.Fait enough. Which elements of Becks game do you see? My bad for assuming and not askin first
I'm sure Michigan will take advantage of the ability to bring on CHL talent.How much help is coming Michigan's way next season? Will he still be alone?
He had a few nagging injuries as well, which took some of the wind out of his sail in the second half. Still, heck a season for the kid.It’s a tougher hill to climb, USHL to the Big 10, than people understand.
Hage had an excellent rookie season! His numbers were down slightly in the second half due to the league recognizing Hage was one of Michigan’s primary offensive threats. Cheers.
It’s quite comparable to Caufield’s freshman year which was very very good but had its warts. Hage played a tougher position and had arguably less help than Caufield. I’d argue that Hage looked more dynamic.
People were really questioning Caufield’s 5 on 5 play and defensive commitment. His sophomore year was almost a quantum leap. If Hage has anything close to that he’ll be fine.
You can argue semantics about what incredible was but it was very impressive year let alone from someone picked in the 20s.
But I do agree he’s less a slam dunk than many of us (myself included) were saying he’d be for a top 6 C. Still incredibly promising