GDT: 2024-2025 Training Camp

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

AuroraBorealis

Back-to-back hater
Oct 16, 2018
19,832
17,159
Vancouver, British Columbia
I don't disagree but there's also an aspect of "what does XYZ line need?" that will help dictate that as well. If Puustinen was what Sid and Rust were missing, he'd have gone there. I don't "LW v RW" shit as we've seen that overridden in the past.
Yeah DOC's a better fit with Sid at this time because of the forechecking and retrievals. I'm saying Puustinen deserved more minutes and games with Malkin. Or at least an offensively engineered L3.
I just don't see evidence of Puustinen being "under used" in anyway. If you want to get off the third line and get called to the 2nd line, you need to produce. Puustinen has that added burden to bear because he doesn't PK, he's not overly defensive, he's not overly physical, and he was only okay on the PP. The way for him to assert himself is to put the puck in the net (or help do it).
He was definitely underused. He got 52 games when he should have gotten 82. We were using Acciari, Harkins, Nieto etc... A lot of trash. The bar wasn't high for improvement.

1726856754333.png


Hard to score much better than this in his position.
I'd also argue he was quite decent on PP1 and was removed from there unjustly. Our alternatives sucked more and our PP needed answers.
Sullivan should value producers like this more. It would have resulted in playoffs the last 2 years, if they had more of it.

To your point about season end totals, again I agree, and I think the best example of that is Rakell. He's not lighting up the scoresheet but regularly when watching replays we see his forechecking or playmaking create the play that puts the puck in the net. Sometimes he gets one on the scoresheet, sometimes not. Good example of why end of season stats don't always tell the full story. Puustinen COULD end up in that bucket but he needs to do it early in the year if he gets the spot. Unfortunately, I think Glass might get the call over him so when he does get the call, he needs to make it count.
Rakell is like a bare minimum producer in his career for what's required in the top-six. He's overrated ad overpaid, because of outlier years. I'd have zero problems moving him to L3 if Puustinen is outplaying him again.
Glass' career production is guttertrash. If he gets the spot based solely on his contract and draft position, that's gonna be annoying. Odds are Puustinen outplays him offensively.
Although Glass is very capable defensively, when he gets his shit together. That will hold a lot of weight with this coach. Plus he plays C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
50,017
26,276
I think Beauvillier with Sid is overthinking it from a chemistry standpoint. Yeah he can get to loose pucks but so can DOC, and DOC can also cycle and get to the net. 50/50 pucks are important but not *that* important.

Beauvillier’s gonna have to score and not just flag down loose pucks.
 

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
55,010
19,493
Pittsburgh
I’m fine with Beauvillier on L1 because O’Connor on L3 is a big boost and there really isn’t anyone that I like better on L1 than Beauviller right now. It’s going to be McGroarty’s spot by the end of the year anyway, so I’m fine with Beauvillier to start.
Man, you got to pick a lane and stick to it.

No wonder your lineups have no SNOWBALLS of a chance. Trying to please everyone and throw everything at the wall and pray it sticks...



This is camp, guys are gonna be used here or there.
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,419
30,022
Yeah unless they flash immediate chemistry/production I don't see what Kingerski is getting all excited about. I don't know why you wouldn't just go with what was working first then assess from there. Beauvillier is an aging reclamation project at this point and what you are trying to reclaim wasn't ever even that good.
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,419
30,022
It's not. He's come to camp toned af.

I think it's a combination of age, blown knees, correctly assessing that it's not worth getting all sweaty over training camp and the fact that the way Malkin moves out on the ice has always lended itself to... various... interpretations depending on who is watching.

But yeah I'm sure his wind is fine.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
84,380
84,606
Redmond, WA
Yeah unless they flash immediate chemistry/production I don't see what Kingerski is getting all excited about. I don't know why you wouldn't just go with what was working first then assess from there. Beauvillier is an aging reclamation project at this point and what you are trying to reclaim wasn't ever even that good.

To be fair, what Beauvillier was from 2017-2023 was better than anything O'Connor has shown in his career.

He really just had a bad 2023-2024, he had 42 points in 82 games in 2022-2023.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Honour Over Glory

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,419
30,022
To be fair, what Beauvillier was from 2017-2023 was better than anything O'Connor has shown in his career.

He really just had a bad 2023-2024, he had 42 points in 82 games in 2022-2023.

Certainly not an awful player but I don't see any reason to get cute re: Crosby's line. But I doubt they are beyond just testing combinations. Sullivan has always done the "one guy who is definitely here and one guy to try" thing at training camp AFAIK.
 

AuroraBorealis

Back-to-back hater
Oct 16, 2018
19,832
17,159
Vancouver, British Columbia
I think it's a combination of age, blown knees, correctly assessing that it's not worth getting all sweaty over training camp and the fact that the way Malkin moves out on the ice has always lended itself to... various... interpretations depending on who is watching.
It's like a back-to-back situation. Hard to muster the energy. This is the 3rd consecutive day of drills and scrimmages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlindWillyMcHurt

Honour Over Glory

Sully-Quinn: Idiots Squared
Jan 30, 2012
78,802
43,936
To be fair, what Beauvillier was from 2017-2023 was better than anything O'Connor has shown in his career.

He really just had a bad 2023-2024, he had 42 points in 82 games in 2022-2023.
This is where I think he gets a shot with Sid to start the year because of his ability to play with top line talent in his career and yeah he is inconsistent but he's already proven more and I think with how this coaching staff thinks, it's a realistic possibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gurglesons

Honour Over Glory

Sully-Quinn: Idiots Squared
Jan 30, 2012
78,802
43,936
I don't really worry much about near-40 Malkin not pouring it all out for like... cone drills or whatever.

He was at his usual conditioning camp with Maxim Ivanov in Florida last month so I doubt it's a matter of him being out of shape.
Geno turns the jets on in scrimmages, but otherwise he knows for him the camp is just to find his timing and see how he does with new line choices. But him and Rakell look like they're on the same page and so far, Pono looks like the best option there with them.

Poor Bunting, blokes forgetting he exists. Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlindWillyMcHurt

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,122
20,778
Yeah DOC's a better fit with Sid at this time because of the forechecking and retrievals. I'm saying Puustinen deserved more minutes and games with Malkin. Or at least an offensively engineered L3.

He was definitely underused. He got 52 games when he should have gotten 82. We were using Acciari, Harkins, Nieto etc... A lot of trash. The bar wasn't high for improvement.

View attachment 908259

Hard to score much better than this in his position.
I'd also argue he was quite decent on PP1 and was removed from there unjustly. Our alternatives sucked more and our PP needed answers.
Sullivan should value producers like this more. It would have resulted in playoffs the last 2 years, if they had more of it.


Rakell is like a bare minimum producer in his career for what's required in the top-six. He's overrated ad overpaid, because of outlier years. I'd have zero problems moving him to L3 if Puustinen is outplaying him again.
Glass' career production is guttertrash. If he gets the spot based solely on his contract and draft position, that's gonna be annoying. Odds are Puustinen outplays him offensively.
Although Glass is very capable defensively, when he gets his shit together. That will hold a lot of weight with this coach. Plus he plays C.
And yet, Rakell was a staple on Malkin's lines because he provides a higher level of compete, physicality, forechecking, etc. All things I said Puustinen was light on. There's more that goes into than just scoring. If scoring is the only you can bring, you need to bring it at a level that overshadows the other positive qualities a guy like Rakell brings. I'm not going to agree with the premise the Puusitnen, in any way, shape, or form deserved to be on the 2nd line with Malkin over Rakell. He didn't. Rakell brought what that line needed more than Puustinen. Same thing with DOC later in the year.

Puustinen might be this year's Zohorna when a random stat may look nice and people gush about him but the eye test shows a lot of "meh".
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
84,380
84,606
Redmond, WA
Certainly not an awful player but I don't see any reason to get cute re: Crosby's line. But I doubt they are beyond just testing combinations. Sullivan has always done the "one guy who is definitely here and one guy to try" thing at training camp AFAIK.

With how massively ERod boomed when he was the same age as Beauvillier, I don't see the risk in trying it out with Beauvillier now. ERod was coming off a horrendous year when the Penguins acquired him (9 points in 38 games with the Sabres) and really boomed for the Penguins after, I don't think it's a stretch to say that Beauvillier can have that kind of resurgence.
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,419
30,022
Geno turns the jets on in scrimmages, but otherwise he knows for him the camp is just to find his timing and see how he does with new line choices. But him and Rakell look like they're on the same page and so far, Pono looks like the best option there with them.

Poor Bunting, blokes forgetting he exists. Lol

I think so long as Bunting maintains MOST of the form he found here last season you can plug and play him anywhere in the top 9. Pono might work well with them but I'd prefer to keep him at center, I think. I have no faith in the Raks/Malkin combo but we'll see.

With how massively ERod boomed when he was the same age as Beauvillier, I don't see the risk in trying it out with Beauvillier now. ERod was coming off a horrendous year when the Penguins acquired him (9 points in 38 games with the Sabres) and really boomed for the Penguins after, I don't think it's a stretch to say that Beauvillier can have that kind of resurgence.

Eh I dunno. Maybe. I think it's a bit of a shame we are discussing DOC versus Beau next to Sid Crosby at his age at all. But that's not material to this discussion, I suppose.
 

DesertedPenguin

Registered User
Mar 11, 2007
7,278
8,175
It's less about Doc than it is giving players like Glass a spot over him on the right side.
Glass and Puustinen are the same age. Glass is a former first round pick.
Glass has five inches on Puustinen.

Everyone should have to earn a spot, but if Glass gets the nod over someone like Puustinen, let's at least recognize the dude is still young and has some pedigree.
 

AuroraBorealis

Back-to-back hater
Oct 16, 2018
19,832
17,159
Vancouver, British Columbia
And yet, Rakell was a staple on Malkin's lines because he provides a higher level of compete, physicality, forechecking, etc. All things I said Puustinen was light on. There's more that goes into than just scoring. If scoring is the only you can bring, you need to bring it at a level that overshadows the other positive qualities a guy like Rakell brings. I'm not going to agree with the premise the Puusitnen, in any way, shape, or form deserved to be on the 2nd line with Malkin over Rakell. He didn't. Rakell brought what that line needed more than Puustinen. Same thing with DOC later in the year.

Puustinen might be this year's Zohorna when a random stat may look nice and people gush about him but the eye test shows a lot of "meh".
Telling me how Sullivan used someone means nothing to me. It's not an indication of anything intelligent by default.
He's a washed coach, and frequently makes stupid choices. That's why the team missed the playoffs the last 2 years.

Rakell was awful last year outside of the Bunting segment. He's never worked with Malkin until that last 20-game stretch, and that's only because of Bunting's impact. He's also bad defensively.
He's fairly good on the wall in battles, but he's also slow to getting there. Since the Pens constantly dump and chase, they need speed with retrievals from someone.
If he reverts to his usual play with Malkin, there's a pretty strong argument to be made that he'd be better used with Hayes or Eller. Which would then open up a spot on RW for a scorer.

It's not a random stat. It's scoring relative to minutes. It's a core requirement for players relied on to do that.
Never understood the scorn for it, but it's unwarranted. It matters, no matter how much people meme here.

When the Pens won the division, they had many players outperforming expectations in this "random stat".
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,880
1,643
Montreal, QC
In games that mattered? That line was a disaster defensively. It did nothing you want to see out of a potential top line. Did it produce? Sure, but it did absolutely nothing defensively that made you think the line would dominate and Doc was mostly just a recipient of strong play by Sid and Rust, offensively.
So the solution is Anthony Beauvillier?

O'Connor is a good defender, he should be first in line for that job IMHO.
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,880
1,643
Montreal, QC
What are you talking about?

Jake was injured and traded away. Sid has no powers over guys re-signing with the team. Yeah, he was bummed out, and his little hissy fit probably cost them a playoff birth. Then he took off on a tear.

So I don't know what you are goin' on about.
You are saying what I am saying.
 

Pancakes

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 4, 2011
26,778
18,996
Yeah unless they flash immediate chemistry/production I don't see what Kingerski is getting all excited about. I don't know why you wouldn't just go with what was working first then assess from there. Beauvillier is an aging reclamation project at this point and what you are trying to reclaim wasn't ever even that good.
Aging? He's 27.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad