Rumor: 2024-2025 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Talk | The Slow Crawl to the Season

dahrougem2

Registered User
Dec 9, 2011
40,136
45,843
Edmonton, Alberta
I still am left wanting. He just isn’t the game breaker I thought he would be.
Media hyped him up as Ovechkin 2.0, he seemed to try buying into it with physical play and even the fight against Ovechkin and he just ain't it.

35-40 guy who is a passenger, not a driver. Which is fine, I'll take a guy like that any day on my team BUT Carolina has made the mistake of believing he's a guy who can help lead you to a Stanley Cup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokecheque

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
53,458
17,795
South Rectangle
“Hey guys, I know I just gave up assets for an impending UFA goalie and signed him to what is probably a slight overpayment, but we’ve decided to go asset management mode regarding Mikko and traded him away for some picks/prospects and a 2nd/3rd line forward.

No no, I know he’s 2nd in the NHL in points. I know he’s a beast in the playoffs. I hear you MacK, you’re not getting any younger. We know this was a key year to go all-in for a Cup win, but trading him and looking towards the future is what is best for business.

Good luck guys, we believe in you.”
Those dumbass ‘01 Avs getting nothing for Sakic, Blake and Roy on expiring contracts!
 

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
46,938
46,115
Caverns of Draconis
There's basically a 0% chance we trade Mikko IMO. He's either re-signing(I still think this is like 90%), or he walks away as a UFA this summer but there's no way the Avs move him.

For shits and giggles, if something insane happened and they did decide to at least entertain a trade, I wouldn't trade him as a rental. I would only deal him if teams were willing to offer returns as if he was fully extended, or maybe even do a sign and trade if the situation gets that ugly.


Admittedly, there's a few interesting scenarios under the purely hypothetical "Trade Mikko" world that are kind of interesting. Being able to possible spread his $12.5M across 2-3 positions would create some interesting scenarios, but it's really hard to imagine one that would position us better then simply having the 110 point Forward signed anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chiarelli

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,957
58,072
The fact that Lehky is producing more next to Mack than Mikko has been able to produce away from Mack tells me that if we get a guy like Necas and plug him with our 1C we'll still have a 100 pts winger. For half the AAV.

I love Lehky but he isn't on pace for 44 goals if he's playing with a normal center :laugh:

 
Last edited:

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,326
26,606
So more like Mikko frustrating?


If by some miracle the Canes are willing to give up a player like that my initial preference would be Svechnikov, but I haven't watched the Canes this season to see Necas break out.
I mean frustrating in the sense of if they aren’t producing they aren’t much for the team. Idk, I think Necas could probably do well in the role Bura was in here. But if he’s supposed to be the Mikko replacement…. He’s just not good enough to do that.
 

Jasenr

Registered User
Nov 25, 2024
88
126
The fact that Lehky is producing more next to Mack than Mikko has been able to produce away from Mack tells me that if we get a guy like Necas and plug him with our 1C we'll still have a 100 pts winger. For half the AAV.

I love Lehky but he isn't on pace for 44 goals if he's playing with a normal center :laugh:


Im still wondering what the trade Mikko camp wants. Another over 100 point winger whos gonna ask 12-13mil in next contract and is new to the team or 2 50 point guys? So which is it?

If you think you can get 100 points winger for less money your delusional. Or that someone is gonna trade one with 3-4 year of 8-9 mil contract left to a 12-13 mil guy.
 
Nov 29, 2003
54,344
40,400
Screw You Blaster
Visit site
Part of me expects the Avs to grab Panarin from the struggling Rangers (retained of course). They really wanted him before, the Rangers are struggling, Rants at risk of walking. Could see it working out.

Plus…Panarin-MacKinnon-Rantanen, terrible defensively, but there’s a good chance that they’ll be too dominant offensively for it to matter

Edit: does it address the teams weaknesses? Absolutely not. Is it the best use of resources? Nope. Would it be something I would be shocked by? Not at all
 

Linds

Makalder
Jun 20, 2016
1,430
1,365
Part of me expects the Avs to grab Panarin from the struggling Rangers (retained of course). They really wanted him before, the Rangers are struggling, Rants at risk of walking. Could see it working out.

Plus…Panarin-MacKinnon-Rantanen, terrible defensively, but there’s a good chance that they’ll be too dominant offensively for it to matter

Edit: does it address the teams weaknesses? Absolutely not. Is it the best use of resources? Nope. Would it be something I would be shocked by? Not at all
What do you think the cost would be? Bread man would need significant retention to fit under the cap
 

hockeyfish

Registered User
Feb 23, 2007
14,719
3,692
Seattle
Part of me expects the Avs to grab Panarin from the struggling Rangers (retained of course). They really wanted him before, the Rangers are struggling, Rants at risk of walking. Could see it working out.

Plus…Panarin-MacKinnon-Rantanen, terrible defensively, but there’s a good chance that they’ll be too dominant offensively for it to matter

Edit: does it address the teams weaknesses? Absolutely not. Is it the best use of resources? Nope. Would it be something I would be shocked by? Not at all
I'd be shocked if he waived.
 

forsbergavs32

Hangman’s OF Walking Advertisement
Jan 21, 2011
29,866
30,500
Fresno,CA
Part of me expects the Avs to grab Panarin from the struggling Rangers (retained of course). They really wanted him before, the Rangers are struggling, Rants at risk of walking. Could see it working out.

Plus…Panarin-MacKinnon-Rantanen, terrible defensively, but there’s a good chance that they’ll be too dominant offensively for it to matter

Edit: does it address the teams weaknesses? Absolutely not. Is it the best use of resources? Nope. Would it be something I would be shocked by? Not at all

Problem is he turned down the Colorado River before.
 
Nov 29, 2003
54,344
40,400
Screw You Blaster
Visit site

Bender

I'll eat pancakes on his grave!
Sep 25, 2002
18,088
10,180
Come on, the guy who traded Drury has been dead for 4 years. Any relevance it has to the current front office is tiny, if it exists at all. And ROR was an ass who had no desire to play here. Also, not relevant.
It was more about the team moving on from players who were a big part of the team and popular in the room rather than a specific example.

Besides, we know that it's not 100% the same but PL did train Sakic during the lean years so it stands to reason the Avs won't overpay Rantanen if they don't feel he's worth what they think he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
17,719
25,806
Panarin signed with NYR after they had missed the playoffs two years in a row. I don't think he gives a f*** how the team looks. He loves NYC.
There was even a story at the time that Panarin himself would've liked the Avs better. But, his then GF, now wife wanted New York for her modelling career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad