expatriatedtexan
Illegitimati non carborundum
- Aug 17, 2005
- 19,585
- 16,744
What about Matt Grzelcyk? His advanced stats are not the greatest this season but then again, he's playing in Pittsburg. I really liked him when he was playing for Boston.
This is far less likely now (for Toews at least)unless someone like Toews goes on LTIR to end the year and makes room for him.
Romanov does stand out actually. We have the ammo, it's just how willing they're going to be to use it.
Bednar would absolutely hate Romanov.
A hit-first player who takes himself out of position going for the body contact, takes penalties, is actually rough in transition.
Again, we have to remember… the Avs way of playing and particularly breaking out is three forwards out of the zone. The D has to be able to retrieve a puck with speed, carry it, and regularly make 30+ foot passes through or past forecheckers.
This is why the top 5 of Makar/Toews/Girard/Manson/Malinski all work. They can all skate. They can all make a stretch pass. They can all stick handle and carry the puck. Manson is super underrated in this perspective.
Romanov isn’t a fit, IMO.
Since the Avs like Finns and Montreal and have been linked to him before I go with Joel Armia. He was a playoff beast when Montreal reached the cup finals and he's a Bednar kind of player.
Pure rental for the playoffs then you run away.
Anyone on those lists that you do see as a fit? If they were willing to pay the price for a longer solution with team control?
I just looked at them.
Mike Matheson would be a perfect Bednar player, but he won’t be available. Habs will keep him.
Lindgren and Ferraro are both good fits, especially Lindgren. Mobile, smart, good passer, good skater, can take top 4 minutes whenever needed.
We talk about Colton and Manson being on the block in the offseason depending on the cap, but it could be Girard too.
If you could shave 2M off Girard, and move Wood you've got 4.5M
We need to target guys that would fit our system. Bednar clearly influences CMac ever since the botched RyJo trade.
I agree to an extent, especially bigger roles. I think Bednar and CMac have always seen pretty eye to eye on playing styles. Joe I think still appreciates some of the old school style that's effective in the playoffs.
I think that has played out with all three kind of agreeing to a hybrid approach, where they bring in good skaters with puck skill for bottom pair or 4th line roles for the regular season, like Kylington, Malinski, or Caleb Jones on defense, and Ivan, Meyers, or Foudy at forward.
But then bring in guys with grit, and perhaps some size, at the expense of skating and puck handling for the playoffs like JJ or using EJ on defense, and Trenin, or Nico Sturm at forward.
I think Bedsy might have come to appreciate the need for grit and size in the NHL playoffs recently as well. Not full size queen, but more than he used to. He understands the need for some pushback.
In what world are they getting a Dman for $3M that can play as a #2/3 Dman which is essentially what Girard plays for us now.
EL doesn't look like he's met a steak he wasn't prepared to eat.Eric Lacroix says all the time that there's only so many steaks you can eat.
When it comes to pro athletes it's mostly ego. They deserve more than the other guy.
Malinski + NYR 2025 2nd for Mario Ferraro ($3.25m, 1 more year)
Curran/Fisher/Humphreys/Zellers/other late pick(s) for Will Borgen ($2.7m pending UFA)
Toews - Makar
Girard - Manson
Ferraro - Borgen
In the off season if capspace is tight you trade Manson (1 year to UFA) and replace him with Borgen, and run a 2nd pairing of Ferraro-Girard and a 3rd pairing of Borgen and Behrens/vet UFA.
Since the Avs like Finns and Montreal and have been linked to him before I go with Joel Armia. He was a playoff beast when Montreal reached the cup finals and he's a Bednar kind of player.
Pure rental for the playoffs then you run away.
EL doesn't look like he's met a steak he wasn't prepared to eat.
No reason for that. Evans is a pure UFA. Lehkonen was an RFA. Considerable difference.Evans could be a good addition for the playoffs, at the same price than they payed for Lehkonen
I think it might go for a LHD, like a Lindgren@50%, Määttä or Dumoulin. With a later pick back to us.I'm beginning to think we'll be keeping that 2nd.
I think it might go for a LHD, like a Lindgren@50%, Määttä or Dumoulin. With a later pick back to us.
Lindgren is a worse defenceman than anyone we've played at defence this year, so f*** that. CHD is Cale Makar compared to him.Lindgren with salary retention for the Ranger's own 2nd rounder back makes too much sense. We'll probably have to toss them a contract like Ludvig or Rosen or some other AHL bum but that's fine
Lindgren is a worse defenceman than anyone we've played at defence this year, so f*** that. CHD is Cale Makar compared to him.
Lol no, the complete opposite. He has been dragging Fox down for years, and Lindgren was bad last year as well. The whole Rangers losing skid actually started when Lindgren came back from injury, they broke up the defence pairs that had worked somewhat, and he was inserted next to Fox.He looks bad on a tire fire Rangers team while playing hurt most of the season, but he's still a huge reason why Fox has been so effective, he takes the brunt of the Rag's defensive responsibilities and he was a big reason why their PK was so good the past few seasons (Along with Igor)
So you answered with no answer... Good stuff.In a world where they buy a RFA or guy with another year that they have to pay up for in trade assets..
It isn't that complicated. Don't come at me with your hyperbolic bullshit. I'm not the one, my logic is absolutely clear throughout my posts regarding the strategy.
Oh, and wipe #2D from your mouth, because Girard isn't a #2. Go eat some soap.