henchman21
Mr. Meeseeks
- Feb 24, 2012
- 65,956
- 51,560
I actually wouldn’t mind him. Has grit, can PK, and can skate. He’d change the complexion of the bottom pairing significantly.Let’s just claim Solovyov, he’s 6’3”!
I actually wouldn’t mind him. Has grit, can PK, and can skate. He’d change the complexion of the bottom pairing significantly.Let’s just claim Solovyov, he’s 6’3”!
I actually wouldn’t mind him. Has grit, can PK, and can skate. He’d change the complexion of the bottom pairing significantly.
Nah. Much like every other top-tier guy that's ever been on the trade market, it's all wishful thinkingWas there a rumour about us trading for Swayman?
The Bruins would want a goalie and a cost controlled top 6 forward for Swayman.
Well, your hearing is out of tune thenSounds like George and Rants to me. They can control the cost of Rants to the tune of 12M over 8 years.
Well, your hearing is out of tune then
Bah gawd that sounds like Georgiev and Ritchie, King!The Bruins would want a goalie and a cost controlled top 6 forward for Swayman.
Georgiev and Nuke, get er done.Bah gawd that sounds like Georgiev and Ritchie, King!
Have some of you people ever even wondered, if Boston would actually have any interest in Mikko? They can't get Swayman signed, so let's trade him for a winger that is going to play beneath Pastrnak but demand more money than him? That'll work.
Send them NukeThe Bruins would want a goalie and a cost controlled top 6 forward for Swayman.
First of all, they couldn't trade for Rantanen as it is without making moves, let alone bring Georgiev along. And then just hope to flip Rantanen again? Third team would have to be involved from the getgo. A third team, that can re-sign Rantanen.They could always flip Rantanen at the deadline for a your standard superstar rental package. That would basically bring in a boat load of assets along with Georgiev.