Same old same old. If Mitch Miller had “Coach Q’s” resume he’d be skating on the Bruins blueline right now.I’m glad the NHL has provided a path to redemption for Joel Quenneville.
Same old same old. If Mitch Miller had “Coach Q’s” resume he’d be skating on the Bruins blueline right now.
I think Elton John’s Sweet Painted Lady who made a living “gettin’ paid for being laid” had nothing on Gary Bettman.
I can see your point.I don't blame Bettman or the league here, I blame the Ducks. There really wasn't a strong enough case against him for the NHL to maintain Quenneville's total ban from the NHL. Nothing regarding his specific personal conduct was ever actually proven in any sort of legal or formal manner. We all know he was involved in suppressing or at least ignoring the Beach allegations, but as the findings of the independent investigation were never tested in a judicial setting it leaves them short of being definitive or confirmed. Perhaps the league should have pushed further on that front but I otherwise understand their position.
But Anaheim were under no obligation to hire him, or even interview him, and did so anyway. That's what I find to be especially unacceptable and showing of a total lack of judgment. This wouldn't fly in a big market team like Boston, but tucked away in Anaheim they can probably make this stick without too much backlash. If I were a fan of theirs though I'd be most unhappy.
Anaheim did call Beach and ask him about Quenneville's involvement and if Beach would have an issue with Q back at the helm of an NHL team. If Beach is okay with it, I'm not sure why fans feel the need to be offended for him, or hold him to some so-called higher standard.I don't blame Bettman or the league here, I blame the Ducks. There really wasn't a strong enough case against him for the NHL to maintain Quenneville's total ban from the NHL. Nothing regarding his specific personal conduct was ever actually proven in any sort of legal or formal manner. We all know he was involved in suppressing or at least ignoring the Beach allegations, but as the findings of the independent investigation were never tested in a judicial setting it leaves them short of being definitive or confirmed. Perhaps the league should have pushed further on that front but I otherwise understand their position.
But Anaheim were under no obligation to hire him, or even interview him, and did so anyway. That's what I find to be especially unacceptable and showing of a total lack of judgment. This wouldn't fly in a big market team like Boston, but tucked away in Anaheim they can probably make this stick without too much backlash. If I were a fan of theirs though I'd be most unhappy.
Anaheim did call Beach and ask him about Quenneville's involvement and if Beach would have an issue with Q back at the helm of an NHL team. If Beach is okay with it, I'm not sure why fans feel the need to be offended for him, or hold him to some so-called higher standard.
I don't think Beach is basing his decision on what is ethical or not, it was more about forgiveness, which takes a lot of courage to do.Yeah I read that. And I think it's important that Anaheim did that, but it doesn't change anything for me. My position is not based on being "offended" on Beach's behalf. And while Beach's opinion in this matter obviously carries a lot of weight, he doesn't get the final say on what's ethical or not.
To me it's quite simple - there's good evidence that Quenneville was involved in temporarily suppressing allegations of sexual misconduct, because winning a game was more important, and then by his own admission he did nothing to follow the matter up personally and simply assumed that it was dealt with. With that in mind you've got to make a determination on two things - was that merely a single lapse in judgment, or does it speak to a deeper character flaw? And is it sufficient to rule him out of any future coaching roles, even if he can demonstrate suitable remorse and reform?
And for me, I can accept it as a single lapse, but one that's bad enough even so that I don't think he deserves to be given another coaching position, no matter how much he's learned from his errors. Harsh maybe, but that's how I see it. Plenty of other things he can do. But senior coaching is a privileged position that I think he should no longer be eligible for.
I apologize in advance for this, but it has been in my head while reading the discussion. If it walks like a Duck, looks like a Duck and quacks like a Duck.....Yeah I read that. And I think it's important that Anaheim did that, but it doesn't change anything for me. My position is not based on being "offended" on Beach's behalf. And while Beach's opinion in this matter obviously carries a lot of weight, he doesn't get the final say on what's ethical or not.
To me it's quite simple - there's good evidence that Quenneville was involved in temporarily suppressing allegations of sexual misconduct, because winning a game was more important, and then by his own admission he did nothing to follow the matter up personally and simply assumed that it was dealt with. With that in mind you've got to make a determination on two things - was that merely a single lapse in judgment, or does it speak to a deeper character flaw? And is it sufficient to rule him out of any future coaching roles, even if he can demonstrate suitable remorse and reform?
And for me, I can accept it as a single lapse, but one that's bad enough even so that I don't think he deserves to be given another coaching position, no matter how much he's learned from his errors. Harsh maybe, but that's how I see it. Plenty of other things he can do. But senior coaching is a privileged position that I think he should no longer be eligible for.
Interesting. I did not know that. Good for Anaheim, I guess. Better for Beach.Anaheim did call Beach and ask him about Quenneville's involvement and if Beach would have an issue with Q back at the helm of an NHL team. If Beach is okay with it, I'm not sure why fans feel the need to be offended for him, or hold him to some so-called higher standard.
Interesting. I did not know that. Good for Anaheim, I guess. Better for Beach.
Be nice to see Quenneville definitively say "I am honored to have an opportunity to do what I love again. However I do want to say that in the past I put the goal of winning a Cup ahead of the very real needs of a young man who was in trouble and for whom I was responsible. That's between Kyle and myself so I won't go further. But it is something I will always regret."
No bullshit, no excuses, no spin. I fell down when I needed to stand strong. Humans fail, I failed, and I understand the consequences.
Agreed. That's good to see.To be fair to Q, he has said some things along those lines following the Ducks' announcement:
"I fully understand and accept those who question my return to the league," Quenneville said. "I know words aren't enough. I will demonstrate (by) my actions that I am a man of character."
"I own my mistakes," Quenneville said, occasionally pausing in his delivery of a written statement. "While I believed wholeheartedly the issue was handled by management, I take full responsibility for not following up and asking more questions. That's entirely on me. Over nearly four years, I've taken time to reflect, to listen to experts and advocates, and educate myself on the realities of abuse, trauma and how to be a better leader. I hope others can learn from my inaction."
Quenneville said he understands just how badly his reputation and career were damaged by his role in the Blackhawks' handling of the accusations against Aldrich. He remained out of hockey for another season after his ban ended, but became increasingly eager to continue his career last winter while watching games every night and staying closely informed on the league.
"I thought I had some work to do in growing as a person," Quenneville said. "As far as doing work along the way, I felt I had progressed to an area where the education I had put me in a position where I know I can share some of these lessons and these experiences as well."
Many people with a firsthand knowledge of Quenneville's attempts to change himself supported his desire to return. Quenneville said he has spoken to Beach several times recently, including Thursday morning.
https://www.espn.com.au/nhl/story/_/id/45059399/joel-quenneville-show-man-character-ducks
So I appreciate that. He's at least making an effort here. A lot of his former players do speak highly of him. End of the day, whether you agree with the appointment or not, it's been made and it's on Joel now to make the most of it, be a model coach and back up his words with actions. In that sense one can only hope he succeeds.
It is good to read that he's putting in the work and that he's owned his part in what went down. I applaud Beach for forgiving Q. It takes incredible strength to do so. That said, I wouldn't have let him back in hockey and I am very happy that he was not hired by the Bruins.To be fair to Q, he has said some things along those lines following the Ducks' announcement:
"I fully understand and accept those who question my return to the league," Quenneville said. "I know words aren't enough. I will demonstrate (by) my actions that I am a man of character."
"I own my mistakes," Quenneville said, occasionally pausing in his delivery of a written statement. "While I believed wholeheartedly the issue was handled by management, I take full responsibility for not following up and asking more questions. That's entirely on me. Over nearly four years, I've taken time to reflect, to listen to experts and advocates, and educate myself on the realities of abuse, trauma and how to be a better leader. I hope others can learn from my inaction."
Quenneville said he understands just how badly his reputation and career were damaged by his role in the Blackhawks' handling of the accusations against Aldrich. He remained out of hockey for another season after his ban ended, but became increasingly eager to continue his career last winter while watching games every night and staying closely informed on the league.
"I thought I had some work to do in growing as a person," Quenneville said. "As far as doing work along the way, I felt I had progressed to an area where the education I had put me in a position where I know I can share some of these lessons and these experiences as well."
Many people with a firsthand knowledge of Quenneville's attempts to change himself supported his desire to return. Quenneville said he has spoken to Beach several times recently, including Thursday morning.
https://www.espn.com.au/nhl/story/_/id/45059399/joel-quenneville-show-man-character-ducks
So I appreciate that. He's at least making an effort here. A lot of his former players do speak highly of him. End of the day, whether you agree with the appointment or not, it's been made and it's on Joel now to make the most of it, be a model coach and back up his words with actions. In that sense one can only hope he succeeds.
It sounds like you're saying Beach doesn't get to decide what's ethical, but you do. You're the one who's saying Quenneville doesn't deserve to coach. That's an ethical judgement.Yeah I read that. And I think it's important that Anaheim did that, but it doesn't change anything for me. My position is not based on being "offended" on Beach's behalf. And while Beach's opinion in this matter obviously carries a lot of weight, he doesn't get the final say on what's ethical or not.
To me it's quite simple - there's good evidence that Quenneville was involved in temporarily suppressing allegations of sexual misconduct, because winning a game was more important, and then by his own admission he did nothing to follow the matter up personally and simply assumed that it was dealt with. With that in mind you've got to make a determination on two things - was that merely a single lapse in judgment, or does it speak to a deeper character flaw? And is it sufficient to rule him out of any future coaching roles, even if he can demonstrate suitable remorse and reform?
And for me, I can accept it as a single lapse, but one that's bad enough even so that I don't think he deserves to be given another coaching position, no matter how much he's learned from his errors. Harsh maybe, but that's how I see it. Plenty of other things he can do. But senior coaching is a privileged position that I think he should no longer be eligible for.
He was not cleared by the NHL at all. In fact, an independent investigation showed he decided not to take action until after the Cup Finals. Per Wikipedia, citing Blackhawks’ Stan Bowman resigns in overhaul over sexual-assault cover-up,It sounds like you're saying Beach doesn't get to decide what's ethical, but you do. You're the one who's saying Quenneville doesn't deserve to coach. That's an ethical judgement.
Honestly, I don't know if he does or doesn't (deserve to coach). I haven't followed the case closely enough to know what constitutes the "good evidence" you mentioned. I know the NHL investigated him and cleared him, and Anaheim asked Beach, and he cleared him. So who am I (who are we) to say he doesn't deserve this chance?
It sounds like you're saying Beach doesn't get to decide what's ethical, but you do. You're the one who's saying Quenneville doesn't deserve to coach. That's an ethical judgement.
Honestly, I don't know if he does or doesn't (deserve to coach). I haven't followed the case closely enough to know what constitutes the "good evidence" you mentioned. I know the NHL investigated him and cleared him, and Anaheim asked Beach, and he cleared him. So who am I (who are we) to say he doesn't deserve this chance?
I’m with you.No, all I'm saying is that in my personal opinion it's unethical. What's ultimately ethical or not is decided by societal consensus, not by any individual be it me, you, Beach, Bettman or anyone else.
Here, it's debatable. And all I'm doing is giving my take on it. The Ducks think differently, so be it.
Fair enough.No, all I'm saying is that in my personal opinion it's unethical. What's ultimately ethical or not is decided by societal consensus, not by any individual be it me, you, Beach, Bettman or anyone else.
Here, it's debatable. And all I'm doing is giving my take on it. The Ducks think differently, so be it.