2024 2025 Injury Thread Hf’s Longest Thread Just Got Longer

Manson doesn’t offer a lot of plus value in the regular season. Let him heal up and use the cap space to get Landy into a couple games before the end of the year.
We would have to waive players still to make it happen (Wood and Vesey minimum), and I doubt they will do that. While it could be an opportunity to get out of the Wood contract, but I think they would prefer to keep him available as an option for the playoffs. Same with Vesey. If Landy is indeed ready to play, you give him a conditioning stint with the Eagles. Makes the most sense roster wise, and probably better for Landy as well.
 
We would have to waive players still to make it happen (Wood and Vesey minimum), and I doubt they will do that. While it could be an opportunity to get out of the Wood contract, but I think they would prefer to keep him available as an option for the playoffs. Same with Vesey. If Landy is indeed ready to play, you give him a conditioning stint with the Eagles. Makes the most sense roster wise, and probably better for Landy as well.
They don't need to waive anyone. Manson and Wood going on LTIR solves the cap issues. Wood has already publicly stated he's going to have back issues the rest of his career.

It's very easy for the Avs to get Landy into the lineup if they want to.
 
They don't need to waive anyone. Manson and Wood going on LTIR solves the cap issues. Wood has already publicly stated he's going to have back issues the rest of his career.

It's very easy for the Avs to get Landy into the lineup if they want to.
Yeah I mean if we can put Wood on LTIR then sure. I just think he's been scratched because he's shit lol.
 
Was Wood listed as a healthy scratch for his most recent scratches? Would they have trouble retroactively saying they are sitting him due to injury and putting him on LTIR if he never comes back into a game?
 

giphy.gif
 
Was Wood listed as a healthy scratch for his most recent scratches? Would they have trouble retroactively saying they are sitting him due to injury and putting him on LTIR if he never comes back into a game?
It doesn't really matter. LTIR and IR are roster manipulation tools. IR is used when you need a roster spot and the injury is not too serious. After the deadline, there are no more roster limitations in terms of # of players, so it IR doesn't matter one lick.
 
It doesn't really matter. LTIR and IR are roster manipulation tools. IR is used when you need a roster spot and the injury is not too serious. After the deadline, there are no more roster limitations in terms of # of players, so it IR doesn't matter one lick.

If the league wouldn't be bothered about it, somehow finding a way to get Wood off the books so Landy can get some regular season games in is a no brainer.
 
There were a bunch of us saying we needed another 2RD to be able to spot or push Manson down. Without Manson Ithink the Avs are done in the POs.

Yeah I think I might have been leading that charge. Been saying that all year.

It just wasn't wise to gamble on Manson and Malinksi as the only RD behind Makar. Manson's injury prone. Malinski's inexperienced and has double with physical forechecks sometimes. Makar's had his own injury problems too.

EJ helps, but he's about to turn 37, and is injury prone himself. Ideally, he should be a #7 at this point on a contending team.

It's also a matter of goals. They needed another goal scoring D man. Ideally they needed a RD with size, that was solid defensively, and had a big shot that could help chip in goals. That's why Jones would have been a good fit.

The way things look now, especially with how they paired Manson and Lindgren together a lot, it feels like they were planning on adding another RD, but didn't have the assets after the Nelson trade. I wonder if the plan was to go after Coyle and Carlo, but after they heard Mikko migth go to Dallas, they decided to ge more aggressive and bring in Nelson too?
 
Yeah I think I might have been leading that charge. Been saying that all year.

It just wasn't wise to gamble on Manson and Malinksi as the only RD behind Makar. Manson's injury prone. Malinski's inexperienced and has double with physical forechecks sometimes. Makar's had his own injury problems too.

EJ helps, but he's about to turn 37, and is injury prone himself. Ideally, he should be a #7 at this point on a contending team.

It's also a matter of goals. They needed another goal scoring D man. Ideally they needed a RD with size, that was solid defensively, and had a big shot that could help chip in goals. That's why Jones would have been a good fit.

The way things look now, especially with how they paired Manson and Lindgren together a lot, it feels like they were planning on adding another RD, but didn't have the assets after the Nelson trade. I wonder if the plan was to go after Coyle and Carlo, but after they heard Mikko migth go to Dallas, they decided to ge more aggressive and bring in Nelson too?
I think acquiring Nelson was a priority over shoring up 2/3RHD. And I wouldn’t be surprised if CMac was going after Carlo but ran out of assets. IIRC EJ was thanking Briere? was it for doing him a solid and trading him back to the Avs. I thought EJ was okay against the Stars but that isn’t the real test. You saw how demanding it is to win the SC. Heck, G got knocked out. Kadri, Burakovsky and Nuke all had broken bones. Nuke played on a broken foot! I remember being terrified at the prospect of having JJ play but to his credit, he really played within himself and didn’t do stupid stuff. Part of that was JB not overplaying him. As much as I think EJ can bring more than I expected when he was traded back, if the Avs are putting EJ in the top 4 in the POs much less planning to rely on him then I think that’s a mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foppa2118
I think acquiring Nelson was a priority over shoring up 2/3RHD. And I wouldn’t be surprised if CMac was going after Carlo but ran out of assets. IIRC EJ was thanking Briere? was it for doing him a solid and trading him back to the Avs. I thought EJ was okay against the Stars but that isn’t the real test. You saw how demanding it is to win the SC. Heck, G got knocked out. Kadri, Burakovsky and Nuke all had broken bones. Nuke played on a broken foot! I remember being terrified at the prospect of having JJ play but to his credit, he really played within himself and didn’t do stupid stuff. Part of that was JB not overplaying him. As much as I think EJ can bring more than I expected when he was traded back, if the Avs are putting EJ in the top 4 in the POs much less planning to rely on him then I think that’s a mistake.

Agree with all of this, except I thought they should prioritize another top 4 RD.

As it is now I see a lot of question marks for various reasons outside of Makar, Toews, and perhaps Girard who's played well this year, but needs a reliable partner IMO, and that's in jeopardy now.

I don't think a contending team should go into the playoffs that way.
 
I think acquiring Nelson was a priority over shoring up 2/3RHD. And I wouldn’t be surprised if CMac was going after Carlo but ran out of assets. IIRC EJ was thanking Briere? was it for doing him a solid and trading him back to the Avs. I thought EJ was okay against the Stars but that isn’t the real test. You saw how demanding it is to win the SC. Heck, G got knocked out. Kadri, Burakovsky and Nuke all had broken bones. Nuke played on a broken foot! I remember being terrified at the prospect of having JJ play but to his credit, he really played within himself and didn’t do stupid stuff. Part of that was JB not overplaying him. As much as I think EJ can bring more than I expected when he was traded back, if the Avs are putting EJ in the top 4 in the POs much less planning to rely on him then I think that’s a mistake.
And this is why I think we should be trying RL at RD... he's at least played it before and is a better all-around Dman than EJ at this point, he's also bigger and better than Malinski.. So why not try Girard and Lindgren together for a bit. Heck, even G has played both sides at times. I'm not saying he was good on the right side, just pointing out he's been used there before.

Regardless, I think we'll be fine no matter what for the remainder of the regular season. It's all about whether or not Manson is back for the playoffs for me. If he's not, I highly doubt we make it past the second round.
 
Agree with all of this, except I thought they should prioritize another top 4 RD.

As it is now I see a lot of question marks for various reasons outside of Makar, Toews, and perhaps Girard who's played well this year, but needs a reliable partner IMO, and that's in jeopardy now.

I don't think a contending team should go into the playoffs that way.
Actually I meant CMac prioritized acquiring Nelson over another top 4D. I was right there with you on the need for another top 4D over the 2C. Now though, I can’t say it was a mistake to go with Nelson. But I’m old school in that I was here for the Avs’ 48 point season. I know how hard it is to build a serviceable D much less one that can win the SC. So it’s a priority with me. However, I’m also a butthead that refuses to acknowledge a mistake (Mitts). BTW, I wanted to keep Byram but that’s water under the bridge. Once we took that leap, I was all in. Between Woods, Georgiev, RyJo and Mitts, I’m of the opinion that CMac could be a little more discerning sometimes but I do like his go for it, all in attitude.
 
Actually I meant CMac prioritized acquiring Nelson over another top 4D. I was right there with you on the need for another top 4D over the 2C. Now though, I can’t say it was a mistake to go with Nelson. But I’m old school in that I was here for the Avs’ 48 point season. I know how hard it is to build a serviceable D much less one that can win the SC. So it’s a priority with me. However, I’m also a butthead that refuses to acknowledge a mistake (Mitts). BTW, I wanted to keep Byram but that’s water under the bridge. Once we took that leap, I was all in. Between Woods, Georgiev, RyJo and Mitts, I’m of the opinion that CMac could be a little more discerning sometimes but I do like his go for it, all in attitude.

Yeah aggression comes with a cost sometimes. You can't bat .1000, so the more you go to bat, the more misses you'll have. Like Babe Ruth.

I respect CMac for trying to make things happen, I just wish he'd apply that aggression to the defense like the team did before. I think that was the key to their Cup win.

There's always players out there who weren't in rumors that could have been traded for. Don't think we heard much about Coyle before the trade.

If Manson has to play injured, or not at all in the playoffs again, the Avs could be in trouble, and they should have known that was a possibility given his injury history. Instead of having a new top 4 RD, with Manson on the 3rd pair, they're looking at possibly an unproven Malinski, and a 37 year old EJ in those roles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flyfysher
Yeah aggression comes with a cost sometimes. You can't bat .1000, so the more you go to bat, the more misses you'll have. Like Babe Ruth.

I respect CMac for trying to make things happen, I just wish he'd apply that aggression to the defense like the team did before. I think that was the key to their Cup win.

There's always players out there who weren't in rumors that could have been traded for. Don't think we heard much about Coyle before the trade.

If Manson has to play injured, or not at all in the playoffs again, the Avs could be in trouble, and they should have known that was a possibility given his injury history. Instead of having a new top 4 RD, with Manson on the 3rd pair, they're looking at possibly an unproven Malinski, and a 37 year old EJ in those roles.

The problem is there wasn't one available, and there are questions as to if Carlo's lack of skating ability would be an issue here.
 
Everyone said CMac went all in at the trade deadline, but i don’t think he did. Going truly all in would mean getting another RD. EJ coming back is good for the locker room and stuff, but we really needed an upgrade there, especially knowing that Manson has been injured all year. So technically CMac didn’t really go all in. We still have a hole on defense

The roster is 25 guys deep, 26 if you add Landeskog. There are no top 100 picks left for the next two drafts. And they traded their top forward prospect away. That's probably as "all in" as one could reasonably expect a team to go.

Yeah, they could have gotten Carlo, but realistically they would have needed more retention than the 15% Toronto got to make it work *or taking Wood back), so to win that bidding war they'd not only have had to match the 1st + Minten part, and then add on top of that for more retention. It just wasn't going to happen as the assets weren't there once Toronto pushed their chips in.

Well besides Jones and Carlo what other RDs were even possible or available that would have been true upgrades? Boston obviously liked what Tor was offering better than the Col offer.

Jokiharju moved for a 4th to Boston, but he's not the stylistic fit the Avs were looking for.

Ristolainen could've been had, but paying Philadelphia's asking price would've been dumb.

Savard was another alternative but he's hardly any better than EJ at this point and would have cost a lot more than EJ too.

Exactly and from my understanding he tried both these options but Jones didn't want Denver and Carlo was too expensive for the assets paid. Cmac got everything he could.
Yeah there's only so much CMac could do. You can't make RHD's appear out of thin air or force teams to trade them to you.
Could have maybe tried to get someone like Gudas. I’m sure there would be some options out there but CMac really prioritized getting the centers we needed. I mean if Manson wasn’t so injured this year, I wouldn’t worry about it too much, but we are getting thin on D without Josh, and one more injury, we gonna have Middleton and EJ playing meaningful minutes which won’t be good

Gudas maybe would have been available, but GM Verbeek is apparently notoriously difficult to negotiate with and you can't force him to give up guys signed with term without an insane overpayment. Gudas was brought in to be a leader on that young team and I there probably wasn't much appetite to move him given how little his name was rumoured to be available.

Yeah I think I might have been leading that charge. Been saying that all year.

It just wasn't wise to gamble on Manson and Malinksi as the only RD behind Makar. Manson's injury prone. Malinski's inexperienced and has double with physical forechecks sometimes. Makar's had his own injury problems too.

EJ helps, but he's about to turn 37, and is injury prone himself. Ideally, he should be a #7 at this point on a contending team.

It's also a matter of goals. They needed another goal scoring D man. Ideally they needed a RD with size, that was solid defensively, and had a big shot that could help chip in goals. That's why Jones would have been a good fit.


The way things look now, especially with how they paired Manson and Lindgren together a lot, it feels like they were planning on adding another RD, but didn't have the assets after the Nelson trade. I wonder if the plan was to go after Coyle and Carlo, but after they heard Mikko migth go to Dallas, they decided to ge more aggressive and bring in Nelson too?
EJ already is the 7D on this team.

As for the other paragraph in bold, the Avs really don't need another goal-scoring D man. They need someone in the Manson mould, someone who can kill penalties and battles in front of the net and along the boards as a partner for Girard. Helleson would be a good target if Anaheim are open to moving him.
 
EJ already is the 7D on this team.

As for the other paragraph in bold, the Avs really don't need another goal-scoring D man. They need someone in the Manson mould, someone who can kill penalties and battles in front of the net and along the boards as a partner for Girard. Helleson would be a good target if Anaheim are open to moving him.

Not with Manson injured. Which could possibly be the case in the playoffs if he has to play hurt again.

Acquiring another top 4 RD would have meant a Manson injury means they need to replace the 3rd pair RD. Something that Malsinki or EJ might be able to do in a pinch, and they could limit their minutes doing so.

Now a Manson injury means both an unproven Malinski and a 37 year old EJ have to step in, and either one, or both need to try to fill that second pair RD spot. That shouldn't be a scenario for a contending team like the Avs after just one injury.

Very much disagree on the type of D man. Goal scoring from D men was a hallmark of their Cup win.

This is the goal list from D men outside of Cale and Toews who play together. There's just not enough outside the top pair.

Girard - 3
Lindgren - 3
Malinski - 2
Manson - 1
Lindgren - 1
EJ - 1
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche
Not with Manson injured. Which could possibly be the case in the playoffs if he has to play hurt again.

Acquiring another top 4 RD would have meant a Manson injury means they need to replace the 3rd pair RD. Something that Malsinki or EJ might be able to do in a pinch, and they could limit their minutes doing so.

Now a Manson injury means both an unproven Malinski and a 37 year old EJ have to step in, and either one, or both need to try to fill that second pair RD spot. That shouldn't be a scenario for a contending team like the Avs after just one injury.

Very much disagree on the type of D man. Goal scoring from D men was a hallmark of their Cup win.

This is the goal list from D men outside of Cale and Toews who play together. There's just not enough outside the top pair.

Girard - 3
Lindgren - 3
Malinski - 2
Manson - 1
Lindgren - 1
EJ - 1
Okay, now go look at the discrepancy between the forwards on the top line and those that aren't.

What we will find is that in both cases we are just seeing the natural discrepancy between top and bottom half roster players. This is normal, not abnormal. If Nelson had been here all year and Nuke healthy all year, I would imagine the lower d-men would have had better opportunities.

Let's also not forget how quickly the lower half roster forwards would leave the D-Zone until very recently. Everytime we go through prolonged periods of being hemmed in, it's the forwards bailing on the dmen causing the issue.
 
Okay, now go look at the discrepancy between the forwards on the top line and those that aren't.

What we will find is that in both cases we are just seeing the natural discrepancy between top and bottom half roster players. This is normal, not abnormal. If Nelson had been here all year and Nuke healthy all year, I would imagine the lower d-men would have had better opportunities.

Let's also not forget how quickly the lower half roster forwards would leave the D-Zone until very recently. Everytime we go through prolonged periods of being hemmed in, it's the forwards bailing on the dmen causing the issue.

I don't think we can really apply what might work for other teams, to what works for the Avs. Goals from D men used to be a huge part of this team.

In 22, the Avs had an 8 goal scoring EJ, and Bo Byram who had 5 in 30 games, outside the top pair. That's a much different dynamic than what they have now.

I think it's the D men making unforced turnovers that are usually the problem. Lindgren and Girard for example last game, which almost cost them the game, and gave Dallas an important point.

Wasn't the forwards fault, they just made mistakes, and Lindgren's came on an outlet chip pass on his backhand because he was forced to play his off side next to Girard. Something they wouldn't need to do if they brought in a top 4 RD.

Unforced turnovers from defenseman was also a big reason (IMO the biggest reason) why they lost to Dallas last year. The Avs transition game, and game as a whole, relies on defenseman that can move the puck.
 
Not with Manson injured. Which could possibly be the case in the playoffs if he has to play hurt again.

Acquiring another top 4 RD would have meant a Manson injury means they need to replace the 3rd pair RD. Something that Malsinki or EJ might be able to do in a pinch, and they could limit their minutes doing so.

Now a Manson injury means both an unproven Malinski and a 37 year old EJ have to step in, and either one, or both need to try to fill that second pair RD spot. That shouldn't be a scenario for a contending team like the Avs after just one injury.

Very much disagree on the type of D man. Goal scoring from D men was a hallmark of their Cup win.

This is the goal list from D men outside of Cale and Toews who play together. There's just not enough outside the top pair.

Girard - 3
Lindgren - 3
Malinski - 2
Manson - 1
Lindgren - 1
EJ - 1
Was the 2022 D group really that much better at scoring goals?

Toews - Makar
Girard - Manson
Byram - EJ
JJ

Toews - Makar
Girard - Manson
Lindgren - Malinski
EJ

The only differences (other than everyone being three years older) is Byram and JJ compared to Malinski and Lindgren.

Byram > Malinski
JJ < Lindgren

Byram definitely scores more than Malinski so technically that group was better offensively. But Lindgren is better defensively which balances things.
 
Kinda sucks we didn’t add another good Dman, EJ doesn't count.

The team would have been the best in the west on paper at least without any doubt.
 
Kinda sucks we didn’t add another good Dman, EJ doesn't count.

The team would have been the best in the west on paper at least without any doubt.
This team IS arguably the best in the west on paper., even without adding another top 4 RHD. Most certainly so if they do add Landeskog.

I mean, which of the other contenders don't have bigger holes on their rosters?

Dallas's RHD is terrible. Winnipeg have Namestnikov at 2C. Compared to that our biggest issue being Manson at 2RHD and Malinski/EJ at 3RHD doesn't seem as bad.
 
This team IS arguably the best in the west on paper., even without adding another top 4 RHD. Most certainly so if they do add Landeskog.

I mean, which of the other contenders don't have bigger holes on their rosters?

Dallas's RHD is terrible. Winnipeg have Namestnikov at 2C. Compared to that our biggest issue being Manson at 2RHD and Malinski/EJ at 3RHD doesn't seem as bad.
Possibly. Now it's still a debate, add another good defenseman and there is no debate.

That being said the options were limited and the Avs don't exactly have that many assets to beging with.
 
adding hide avatars option

Ad

Ad