StLewis11
Registered User
Is Matt Joseph injured? I noticed he's been scratched at least the last couple of games, hasn't yet played under Monty.
Injury Report: 2024 - 2025 Injury Reports
- Thread starter simon IC
- Start date
Snubbed4Vezina
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2022
- 2,584
- 4,602
He had recently returned from injury but Monty took a why change what worked in Game 1 approach for Game 2.
StLewis11
Registered User
CaliforniaBlues310
Registered User
He was on the 4th line with Torpo and Faksa today in practice.
Also, Broberg has been activated from the IR per the Blues twitter account.
ChicagoBlues
Terraformers
- Oct 24, 2006
- 16,765
- 7,421
So Buch is, indeed, injured. He can't be hurt that bad being all dressed up to go out for dinner.
Monty said "day to day, he didn't practice today but its the kind of thing he could be good tomorrow" or something along those lines, I'm paraphrasing
Renard
Registered User
What is wrong with Nick Leddy? He's missed two months and his absence has caused us to trade for Fowler (who I like). When he first went out of the lineup Leddy was thought to be *day to day."
Great question. I can't recall any similar situation where a player doesn't have an injury event we know of, but is clearly playing through something, then gets pulled from the lineup for that injury, misses a ton of time and has no surgery announced while the team acts like he'll miss the full season with a trade for his position.
Krug, it was announced exactly what was wrong, that he's having surgery, and a time table for reevaluation. Leddy just disappeared. "Nick who? Oh yea him, he's day-to-setback, we'll see him in.....here's Cam Fowler"
PocketNines
Cutter's Way
Is it possible Leddy was facing a choice between surgery and managing an issue and went with managing, and then had a significant setback where he re-damaged whatever wasn't fully healed? That seems like a thing that could happen to a person instead of it being an unprecedented outlier
bleedblue1223
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2011
- 53,051
- 16,644
Wonder if it's something like high ankle sprain, groin, stress fracture, or something that doesn't really have a surgical option, and can be something that just lingers, so a timeline that is hard to predict.
Sure. But something can also be a thing that happens to a person AND an outlier. Me saying I can't recall a similar situation is a weird thing to get offended about.
We don't know much about what's going on. It could be a lot of things. Any of them if true by definition of having happened to a person, Leddy, would be a thing that could happen to a person. I apologize profusely for not explicitly recognizing that whatever the thing that happened to this person could be a thing that could happen to a person.
I wondered if it was something like a sports hernia. You can play through the pain until you can't...and eventually you'll need surgery.
PocketNines
Cutter's Way
noticing what a person fails to consider does not equate to getting offended.
it might in a caricature narrative conjured by someone, but not in actuality
it might in a caricature narrative conjured by someone, but not in actuality
Fine whatever, you weren't offended. I have no idea what you are on about though. I didn't say something so obvious it doesn't bear mentioning. Nick Leddy is a person. Do I have to hire Brian39 to draft some small print boilerplate pointing out all the obvious things to put at the bottom of my posts. Majorityof1 hereby recognizes that water is wet, the sky is blue, and a person is a person.
PocketNines
Cutter's Way
'that could happen to a person' colloquially = a normal thing that could be expected.
ie, not an outlier.
interestingly enough, "outliership" vs. normal thing was the whole observation.
I guess that was too self contained, calm and on point
we had to create a whole victim pedantry pageant out of it
ie, not an outlier.
interestingly enough, "outliership" vs. normal thing was the whole observation.
I guess that was too self contained, calm and on point
we had to create a whole victim pedantry pageant out of it
That is not a colloquialism. Colloquially is an informal way of expressing something that has meaning based on its usage in normal conversation. I don't know what weird conversations you have, but "that could happen to a person" is not more informal than "that's normal", nor does it connote that in any normal conversation.
By trying to impress people with your language, you are completely incapable of speaking informally for a colloquialism. Like "victim pedantry pageant"? Really? What does that even mean? I know what the nouns mean individually, but you can't just string 3 multiple nouns together and think it creates some meaning. Pedantic is the adjective form of pedantry. So let's go with that. Is the pageant pedantic or the victim? Are you saying its a pageant of pedantic victims? Or is the pageant really focused on the details? A Pedantic pageant of victims? Or do the victims own the pageant? Maybe its a victim's pedantic pageant? Anyway, it must be a colloquialism, and I should get it. But you are much smarter than I, you own a thesaurus, even if you don't know how to use it.
Last edited:
PocketNines
Cutter's Way
Ad
Upcoming events
-
-
Kansas City Chiefs @ Pittsburgh Steelers - NetflixWagers: 10Staked: $3,576.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
