Speculation: 2024-2025 General Lightning Discussion II: Oh no! We dont suck again!

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
48,070
24,452
NB


Kreider healthy scratched tonight.

Not sure it's ever possible with a $6.5M hit until 27.

Double retentention, if the Rangers are burning it down. Not sure if we have the assets for that. But this type of player, even if not specifically him, takes us from a fringe contender to a contender IMO.

Cap is going up and we don't have any big raises coming, if I'm not mistaken.

I don't want anything to do with that piece of shit.
We took Corey Perry and he made us better.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Stammertime91

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
48,070
24,452
NB
What he does, he does extremely well, Kreider doesn’t do enough of the smaller things for me.
Right, but he doesn't make a ton of money, especially with the assumption the cap will be going up. All we really need him to do is crash the net recklessly. We don't have that guy. But imagine that guy making goalies nervous while Kuch assesses his options.
 

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,504
10,009
Tampa Bay
Right, but he doesn't make a ton of money, especially with the assumption the cap will be going up. All we really need him to do is crash the net recklessly. We don't have that guy. But imagine that guy making goalies nervous while Kuch assesses his options.
If he was 28, and not 33, I could be convinced. With his playstyle, I would be nervous of his future production and injuries, and it looks like he’s already starting to slide.

If the Rangers were willing to eat 50% and he was extremely cheap to get asset wise, sure, but I don’t think that would be realistic. If he loses a step or becomes chronically injured, he’s an anchor for another two years. IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zwui21

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
48,070
24,452
NB
If he was 28, and not 33, I could be convinced. With his playstyle, I would be nervous of his future production and injuries, and it looks like he’s already starting to slide.

If the Rangers were willing to eat 50% and he was extremely cheap to get asset wise, sure, but I don’t think that would be realistic. If he loses a step or becomes chronically injured, he’s an anchor for another two years. IMO
We would be bringing him in for two years to try to make a run. This wouldn't be a rebuild move. It would be about loading up for what realistically could be the rest of the window.

I just don't think we could outbid the competition on a guy who plays this style. Contenders always need this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,504
10,009
Tampa Bay
We would be bringing him in for two years to try to make a run. This wouldn't be a rebuild move. It would be about loading up for what realistically could be the rest of the window.

I just don't think we could outbid the competition on a guy who plays this style. Contenders always need this.

What would you be willing to trade for him?
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
48,070
24,452
NB
What would you be willing to trade for him?
Honestly probably not close to as much as a team with more assets. Definitely a 1st. Maybe a 1st and a prospect.

It's a gamble for sure. Because yeah, he could fall off a cliff as soon as this year. But the price would also be lower than a younger player like Tuch. I don't think we could come close to meeting that price tag. Kreider is a long shot, but it's possible.

The only really significant adds we have a chance to make will come with risks. We just don't have the assets.

I like Kreider's contract and love his style of play. I've wanted him for years but this might be the first time it's even plausible (forget realistic, because yeah, it's probably not).

Also, a note: JBB might be looking to get younger on the fly. The Guentzel move seems to show that. He might be looking for guys in the middle of their prime (30ish) rather than the end (35ish) in hopes of extending the window by a year or two. And so far he's been good with that.

But in the 2025 playoffs... man l, Chris Kreider makes us scary offensively. And Vasy looks like Vasy again.
 

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,504
10,009
Tampa Bay
Did a quick look at the trade board and it sounds like most are kinda thinking the same thing as me. Many posters who watch him on the regular are saying he is washed. At one point I woulda traded a kings ransom for him, but seems like we’re chasing shadows if we are expecting him to be what we want him to be.


 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
48,070
24,452
NB
Did a quick look at the trade board and it sounds like most are kinda thinking the same thing as me. Many posters who watch him in the regular are saying he washed. At one point I woulda traded a kings ransom for him, but seems like we’re chasing shadows if we are expecting him to be what we want him to be.


He scored 70+ points last year, and, this year, has been playing through an injury on a team that has quit.

This is the only reason why he might
possibly come down to our price range.

And 11 goals in 30 games with that dumpster fire is very likely still capable of 35 here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,504
10,009
Tampa Bay
He scored 70+ points last year, and, this year, has been playing through an injury on a team that has quit.

This is the only reason why he might
possibly come down to our price range.

If he’s just a little injured, I would give a 1st or a little more for 50% retention. Cap wise that is probably our only way anyways.

He could help us for our cup window, but if he’s cooked he could be pushing it shut. That’s a lot of cap space and risk
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
48,070
24,452
NB
If he’s just a little injured, I would give a 1st or a little more for 50% retention. Cap wise that is probably our only way anyways.

He could help us for our cup window, but if he’s cooked he could be pushing it shut. That’s a lot of cal space
I'd give more than a 1st for 50% retention. Then you're talking about a 3.1m cap hit, which allows us to add another player in the off season. I would pay a pretty decent price for Kreider at that hit. Because it lowers the risk substantially. If he doesn't work out, he's easy to get rid of and probably good enough to keep. But there's still a solid chance he scores 8 or 10 hard-nosed playoff goals in 25 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz

Sky04

Registered User
Jan 8, 2009
29,754
19,097
I mean you guys were down for Kakko and he does shit all except have draft position stapled to his head.

The argument for Kreider is pretty straight forward.
 

ccman68

Registered User
Dec 9, 2017
4,628
4,863
I mean you guys were down for Kakko and he does shit all except have draft position stapled to his head.

The argument for Kreider is pretty straight forward.
Kakko has a contract we could’ve gotten without doing anything crazy. New York retaining 50% on Kreider for 3 years is so far-fetched it’s not worth thinking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rschmitz

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
17,504
10,009
Tampa Bay
I mean you guys were down for Kakko and he does shit all except have draft position stapled to his head.

The argument for Kreider is pretty straight forward.

What’s funny is Kakko somehow does shit all but still has out produced Kreider, doesn’t exactly inspire me to think it’s a trade that should be made
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad