2024-2025 Blues Trade Proposals Thread. | Page 138 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

2024-2025 Blues Trade Proposals Thread.

Agreed on Kyrou. We should really look for a hockey trade for him. Holloway will make anyone better he plays with, im not worried about him losing chemistry with a trade. Kyrou just isnt gonna win us any playoff games and its better to move him before his no trade clause kicks in. He cant win puck battles, and gets pushed off the puck way to easily. Hopefully we can find a suitor, and use him as capital to fill a major need.

We sure about this?

He wont be a bad player regardless. But we saw him with a lot of different players this season, and he was up and down Edmonton's lineup last season.

I don't fully disagree he wont win us playoff games. But I like our chances alot more when we don't have to solely rely on him esp when you stick him with Thomas and Thomas forgets that he's capable of scoring 20+goals a season.
 
If Faulk can’t be traded, please buy him out. If a young guy makes mental mistakes every game, chalk it up to inexperience.

Faulk must place bets on the opponent every f***ing game.

He’s easily my most disliked player since Chris Stewart.

Every time the camera zooms in on Faulk’s face I swear he’s thinking, how can I possibly f*** up the game more than I already have.
Ever watched Leddy try to do anything?
 
Ottawa isn't trading Brady. Get over it.
That's fine. Kyrou still must go. Trade him for futures. That cap space is more valuable just having it to take on a bad contract to acquire additional capital than having a floating weak pushover who will never help any team win 16 playoff games unless he can get 3rd pairing matchups on a stacked team.
 
ANA has a plethora of yound D. Would like to take a chance on one of them. Not a lot of teams are going to be selling talent this summer. Only true tankers are CHI, SJS, ANA, PIT, BOS? First two really have nothing of value their selling. Middlers like NYI and DET we are speculative of. Just seems like parity is super high right now and nobody is really tearing it down who has talent left to buy. We'll see at the draft, cap space this summer may give other middlers false hope they can make it next year
 
That's fine. Kyrou still must go. Trade him for futures. That cap space is more valuable just having it to take on a bad contract to acquire additional capital than having a floating weak pushover who will never help any team win 16 playoff games unless he can get 3rd pairing matchups on a stacked team.
Trading Kyrou for futures is literally f***ing insane..... This is why GM's don't start making moves 10 minutes after their season ended where the only factor involved is emotion. If there is a serious hockey trade to be made for Kyrou to upgrade the backend, I'm willing to listen. Seriously suggesting moving him for a handful picks makes me glad we have a GM who isn't an unhinged lunatic..
 
Trading Kyrou for futures is literally f***ing insane..... This is why GM's don't start making moves 10 minutes after their season ended where the only factor involved is emotion. If there is a serious hockey trade to be made for Kyrou to upgrade the backend, I'm willing to listen. Seriously suggesting moving him for a handful picks makes me glad we have a GM who isn't an unhinged lunatic..
Futures can be moved for key cogs. It doesn't have to be for a trade for b tkachuk straight up. We can dump him to a team that gives us nice players to put into a package.

I personally hope he ends up in Buffalo. He can go be closer to home and fit in well there.

Kyrou must and will go. I am very pleased to see many other people finally smelling the coffee and jumping onto this side of the fence. He is what he is and he will never be a key factor on a team like us that requires 4 lines to all produce and play a physical game.
 
Futures can be moved for key cogs. It doesn't have to be for a trade for b tkachuk straight up. We can dump him to a team that gives us nice players to put into a package.

I personally hope he ends up in Buffalo. He can go be closer to home and fit in well there.

Kyrou must and will go. I am very pleased to see many other people finally smelling the coffee and jumping onto this side of the fence. He is what he is and he will never be a key factor on a team like us that requires 4 lines to all produce and play a physical game.
I wouldn't confuse people willing to move him in the right deal as people who are suddenly anti Kyrou that you were able to convert. I don't see it happening. For one, Army found the perfect complimentary winger for him who can match him stride for stride who share obvious chemistry on the ice. Secondly, moving him for assests essentially makes the progress of this season a wash and sets us back a good 5 years, at least.
 
Yeah, I hope last night was Faulk’s last as a Blue. I think you could get (meager) value for him without paying to do so. The defense needs a rethink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheOrganist
This series made it pretty clear what we have to upgrade, #2 C and #2 RD.

I think Fowler has solidified himself as a #1 PP D, so I don't think we have to focus on offense, but I do think it would make sense to add another offensvie guy to the group, especially with Faulk being replacing in this scenario. I either want someone bigger than Faulk or a better skater, ideally both. Depending on how everything plays out, we could review the 3rd pair, but this really comes down to who is left of the vets, who we are able to move, and how to round out the roster. I expect that pair to be Tucker and someone, maybe that someone is Faulk, Leddy, or Suter, and maybe it's someone from outside.

The 2nd line is either as big or a bigger area to address. Yes, a healthy Holloway solves a lot, but it's not good that we are so dependent on him being healthy for that line to drive. I'm not putting it all on Kyrou, but it's clear that Schenn is who he is at this point, he's more of a 3rd liner if he's the main guy, but he can be a 2nd liner if he's the 3rd part of the line. We need someone that can drive a 2nd line on their own, so that if Holloway misses time, it doesn't just fall apart.

For what's available. I'd have Kyrou available, but only for a player of similar quality for either of the positions above. Those positions are of higher value, so that'll play a factor, but I'm not just trading him to trade him. A different winger, such as Neighbours or Bolduc? I'm not really advocating trading either one, but I could see teams valuing them pretty high right now. I'd prefer not to. I think on some level you look at Schenn again, although he's my ideal #3 C right now. I'm not all that interested in trading major prospects, unless we are getting a major player at a youngish age. If you can get a #1 C or top-pair dman that's under 30, I'd be willing to include Dvorsky if that's what it took, but we can cross that bridge if the opportunity arises.

I'm comfortable with Snuggerud on the top line or somewhere in the top 6. Given the circumstances of coming straight from NCAA, I thought he did very well, and with a summer of training and a full training camp, I think he'll be more than ready for a full season of top 6 minutes.

Buchnevich-Thomas-Snuggerud
Holloway-X-(Kyrou)
Neighbours-Schenn-Bolduc

I think for me a somewhat ideal setup would have Kyrou moved and we get a higher end #2 C in some sort of deal, and Dvorsky grabs a wing spot and eventually takes the #3 C spot. I'm also fine if Dvorsky starts in Springfield again.

And while it's not a major aspect of our off-season, I'm curious what we do with the 4th line. That trio were very effective together, but ideally, Sunny is knocked down to the 4th. Do we bring Faksa back? With his faceoffs and defensive work, I think we do, or someone like him. Sunny is best as a winger IMO. Do we just run the 4 of them as a 4th line to keep the one scratched hungry for a spot, and when injuries hit, Sunny plays up?
 
Now, I fully expect us to retain all 3 of Binnington, Hofer, and Ellis, but I also expect Army to get approached for Binnington and Hofer. I think it's a situation where in most cases, it's best to hold, but if some team comes in hard, you consider it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad