A Real Barn Burner
Registered User
- Apr 25, 2016
- 2,692
- 4,018
I understand and agree with many of the points you both make. However, Backes moved to center and Scheen played wing in Philadelphia. Despite any reservations, it makes logical sense to try him out, considering that we have Thomas and Dvorsky as a formidable 1-2 punch at center for the foreseeable future, and our top six is already crowded, let alone potential future top nine if many of our prospect hit. That 3C spot should be open, and I’m not aware of any prospect in our pool who is 100 percent guaranteed to fill it. I believe Nieghbors’ game is similar to Backes’, and I think it would translate extremely well to center. While he may not have Schenn’s IQ, and his growth might require him to develop different skills than he’s currently honing, I think the risk is worth taking if you want him to be here long-term.I don’t think he has the talent and IQ that Schenn has
Schenn’s style of play has lead to injuries as he has gotten older, we kind of forgot how good he was when younger and healthier
I don’t think that’s a feasible option. Given he played wing in juniors, he’s so far removed from the last time he might have played center. It’d be a massive commitment to get him to transition to center, and odds are it wouldn’t work out in the end. Plus I think it’d hurt his growth as a player overall to commit to learning center, so we’d end up with a lesser version of the Neighbours we could have had and no center to show for it.
The core issue with this concept lies in the fact that both Dvorsky and Nieghbors would require the 3C position next year to learn it. Since Dvorsky is likely to occupy that spot, it seems unlikely that this scenario will materialize. Nevertheless, if Dvorsky starts in the AHL once again to start the season next year or if he needs to learn the NHL game at wing and not center, I genuinely hope we consider giving it a try.
Last edited: