2024-2025 Blues Multi-Purpose Thread.

[Brian39]

Left is Heritage blue. Right is 68-72 blue, and the one we used on this year's Winter Classic...I "think" I'm seeing more of the right than the left. I don't blame you because my brain automatically jumps to the heritage blue when I see the more acute logo.

View attachment 1054260

Nothing makes me question my perception of reality more than seeing people with actual design/art talent talk about colors.

That color on the left looks more like San Jose Sharks teal to me than any color that has ever been on a Blues jersey.

 

[ChicagoBlues]

Left is Heritage blue. Right is 68-72 blue, and the one we used on this year's Winter Classic...I "think" I'm seeing more of the right than the left. I don't blame you because my brain automatically jumps to the heritage blue when I see the more acute logo.

View attachment 1054260

The Heritage blue in your example has a slight green tint.

Oh! Brian39 just posted that.

 

[STL fan in MN]

So, basically the winter classic jerseys.

Geez. How many times are the Blues employees in the apparel dept going to ruin it for the Blues employees in the graphic design and marketing depts?

They’ve leaked the new logo at least 3x now lol.

 

[taylord22]

To be clear, I’m no visual maestro.

Maybe ChicagoBlues can confirm, but I’ve been told that heritage blue comes off as more “steely” on actual glossy threads, but it does have way more green to generate that sort of dustiness.

Regardless, I’m seeing some other reports that it is indeed the blue used on the 24-25 winter classic. I guess we’ll find out tomorrow, but I’ll be a happy camper if it’s a more primary blue than the heritage.

 

[joe galiba]

Left is Heritage blue. Right is 68-72 blue, and the one we used on this year's Winter Classic...I "think" I'm seeing more of the right than the left. I don't blame you because my brain automatically jumps to the heritage blue when I see the more acute logo.

View attachment 1054260

all I see is blue

 

[ChicagoBlues]

To be clear, I’m no visual maestro.

Maybe ChicagoBlues can confirm, but I’ve been told that heritage blue comes off as more “steely” on actual glossy threads, but it does have way more green to generate that sort of dustiness.

Regardless, I’m seeing some other reports that it is indeed the blue used on the 24-25 winter classic. I guess we’ll find out tomorrow, but I’ll be a happy camper if it’s a more primary blue than the heritage.

I see it as creamy, not steely.

 

[Snubbed4Vezina]

Left is Heritage blue. Right is 68-72 blue, and the one we used on this year's Winter Classic...I "think" I'm seeing more of the right than the left. I don't blame you because my brain automatically jumps to the heritage blue when I see the more acute logo.

View attachment 1054260

I wanted the heritage blue instead of a basic royal blue, but it looks like there's still a bit more 'grey' to it than the current home set, which is fine with me.

All in all this looks like it's pretty close to the set I've been clamoring for over the last couple seasons. I'm pretty excited. Love the new Bluenote too.

Well done! Can't wait to see them raise Lord Stanley in them!

 

[BlueMed]

The Blues better not bring back an old logo only to call it "new" like the Kings did last summer and the Bruins are doing now.

 

[ChicagoBlues]

I wanted the heritage blue instead of a basic royal blue, but it looks like there's still a bit more 'grey' to it than the current home set, which is fine with me.

All in all this looks like it's pretty close to the set I've been clamoring for over the last couple seasons. I'm pretty excited. Love the new Bluenote too.

Well done! Can't wait to see them raise Lord Stanley in them!

It does have a little grey in it and the royals have that brilliant luster.