2024-2025 Blues Multi-Purpose Thread.

[TheOrganist]

Pretty dumb signing to begin with as most of us said at the time...good riddance.

 

[sfvega]

Yeah, could have just not bothered with him at all this year. But better late than never.

 

[Majorityof1]

Pretty dumb signing to begin with as most of us said at the time...good riddance.

Eh, it's a completely buriable contract. We are able to send him down with zero cap cost. We actually needed him. With Saad, Texier, Joseph and Thomas all missing time at various points. He's better than our call up options at the time.

I don't get the vitriol about a $1m 13th-15th forward when healthy. I get it from @Memento standpoint, re: his personal history. But from a pure hockey management view, what he brings vs what he costs, its in line with expectations. I don't think you can make an argument that not signing him would have materially affected our season for the better.

 

[CaliforniaBlues310]

To add onto what @Majorityof1 said, he was signed before we got deals done with Holloway, Texier, Joseph, and Faksa as well.

On July 1st, we needed bottom six depth. His contract for what he brings isn’t bad either.

 

[Bye Bye Blueston]

To add onto what @Majorityof1 said, he was signed before we got deals done with Holloway, Texier, Joseph, and Faksa as well.

Exactly. There was no opportunity cost. He literally didn't prevent us from acquiring better players.

 

[bleedblue1223]

And even in the long-run, I doubt his cash salary prevented Army from doing something else.

 

[BlueMed]

If Thomas is ready I'm very very very worried he was rushed

I don't think anyone really needs to be. When a player is injured, there is a process where the team physician re-evaluates the player and clears him to play again. Often times, the initial timeline is very conservative so players do come back sooner, but they have to pass certain tests before they can be allowed to return to full activity.

 

[TheOrganist]

Eh, it's a completely buriable contract. We are able to send him down with zero cap cost. We actually needed him. With Saad, Texier, Joseph and Thomas all missing time at various points. He's better than our call up options at the time.

I don't get the vitriol about a $1m 13th-15th forward when healthy. I get it from @Memento standpoint, re: his personal history. But from a pure hockey management view, what he brings vs what he costs, its in line with expectations. I don't think you can make an argument that not signing him would have materially affected our season for the better.

Vitriol? Nothing about this season would rise to the level of vitriol. He's a useless player who brings nothing of substance to a hockey team but vitriol? No.

 

[Frenzy31]

GMs don't set the lineups, but they can certainly try a force a coach's hand into playing certain players more. I do wonder if that was part of Army's rationale here other than, you know, Kapanen not being a very good hockey player.

Armstrong will try to work for deals that help players - Fabbri comes to mind. Kap wasn't getting any playing time and that really isn't good for a guy on a 1 year contract. There was no market for him via trade, and the Blues wouldn't have wanted to add an asset to help him move - so. Waiver makes sense.

If he isn't claim, he plays in the AHL and hopefully is able to add some scoring to the Tbirds.

 

[Linkens Mastery]

I don't think anyone really needs to be. When a player is injured, there is a process where the team physician re-evaluates the player and clears him to play again. Often times, the initial timeline is very conservative so players do come back sooner, but they have to pass certain tests before they can be allowed to return to full activity.

And Hockey players are known to force themselves to play through injuries they shouldnt play through.

 

[SirPaste]

Armstrong will try to work for deals that help players - Fabbri comes to mind. Kap wasn't getting any playing time and that really isn't good for a guy on a 1 year contract. There was no market for him via trade, and the Blues wouldn't have wanted to add an asset to help him move - so. Waiver makes sense.

If he isn't claim, he plays in the AHL and hopefully is able to add some scoring to the Tbirds.

Bortuzzo last year to the Isles is another good example of this.

 

[BlueDream]

Eh, it's a completely buriable contract. We are able to send him down with zero cap cost. We actually needed him. With Saad, Texier, Joseph and Thomas all missing time at various points. He's better than our call up options at the time.

I don't get the vitriol about a $1m 13th-15th forward when healthy. I get it from @Memento standpoint, re: his personal history. But from a pure hockey management view, what he brings vs what he costs, its in line with expectations. I don't think you can make an argument that not signing him would have materially affected our season for the better.

Nobody is saying that not bringing him back means we would have been a playoff team or something.

People just don’t like him because he’s a useless player that does not provide anything more than an AHL player at this point (so no, we didn’t need him), and bringing him back was stupid because we already knew he sucked. Could have just tried someone new with that contract spot.

 

[ChicagoBlues]

DA finally took a Krapanen.

 

[Majorityof1]

Vitriol? Nothing about this season would rise to the level of vitriol. He's a useless player who brings nothing of substance to a hockey team but vitriol? No.

Vitriol may have been overstating it. But multiple people saying good riddance for a guy who has played in half our games and averaged 11 minutes seems excessive. Saying it was dumb to sign him for a nothing contract as a 13th forward seems excessive.

He was a depth signing. We were able to add other, better depth players. It pushed him down the chart, and now we are waiving him. I hope he clears so we have cheap depth fo rmore injuries, just in case, and aren't forced to call up young guys who aren't ready.

 

[Majorityof1]

Nobody is saying that not bringing him back means we would have been a playoff team or something.

People just don’t like him because he’s a useless player that does not provide anything more than an AHL player at this point (so no, we didn’t need him), and bringing him back was stupid because we already knew he sucked. Could have just tried someone new with that contract spot.

We have a contract spot open we didn't use, so that argument is moot. I'm not sure we could get a 20+ point guy who can PK for $1M. That's what Kap was last year and historically he was mire if a 30 point guy.

He's worse this year, but so is the whole team. People were more than fine paying Toropchenko $1.7M and he has 4 points in 17 games, a far less pace than Kapanen had last year.

Look, I wanted Kap scratched to start the season. I wanted Bolduc playing over him. But when we got injuries, he's a better call up than Alexandrov, Sylvegard, McGing or Peca. Now he's going down. OK, it's the right call, but hardly worth celebrating.

 

[BlueDream]

Vitriol may have been overstating it. But multiple people saying good riddance for a guy who has played in half our games and averaged 11 minutes seems excessive. Saying it was dumb to sign him for a nothing contract as a 13th forward seems excessive.

He was a depth signing. We were able to add other, better depth players. It pushed him down the chart, and now we are waiving him. I hope he clears so we have cheap depth fo rmore injuries, just in case, and aren't forced to call up young guys who aren't ready.

This is rich coming from you.

You’d be jumping up and down if the Blues put Binnington on waivers, and he actually helps the team unlike Kapanen.

You hate players for plenty of dumb reasons, yet now you want to come police how people react to Kapanen being put on waivers. Like why do you care so much what other posters say? Sit this one out.

 

[Brockon]

Could the Kapanen waive also be a paper transaction for cap savings gymnastics?

Not that we need the cap space currently, but if Army is already in a sell mindset, he could be attempting to maximize our available cap space for the TDL to allow us to retain a contract as a 3rd party or gain additional flexibility to take a bad contract in exchange for assets?

 

[Majorityof1]

This is rich coming from you.

You’d be jumping up and down if the Blues put Binnington on waivers, and he actually helps the team unlike Kapanen.

You hate players for plenty of dumb reasons, yet now you want to come police how people react to Kapanen being put on waivers. Like why do you care so much what other posters say? Sit this one out.

I specifically stated that'd I understand if it is non-hockey related. Memento hates him because he has drunk driving charges and she lostt a friend to a drunk driver. Completely get that. But from a purely hockey ops standpoint, it's not altering the trajectory of this team one iota either way.

This is a hockey discussion forum. I don't police what people say, I discuss and I push back if I disagree. But people are free to gave any hockey opinions they want. If you think I'm wrong, push back as well. But I never said, "you can't say Kapanen was a good signing or good riddance". I just said I didn't understand the vehemence of the reaction and explained why.

The question can be reversed. Why do you care what I say? Unlike my posts, you are telling me not to say my opinion, "Sit this one out".