2024-2025 AUS Thread

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
What looked like might be a lopsided game turned out to be a nail biter. Les Aigles probably has some confidence going into game 2 in Moncton.
I’m definitely not discrediting them , they played well in the last 2 periods but it did feel like UNB kind of fell asleep at the wheel once they got ahead and that helped change the momentum in Moncton’s favour.
 
From Darren Dreger Xwitter:

An interesting rule change will be announced by U Sports. Hockey players who have played pro will be eligible to play U SPORTS with no sit out period (was 365 days). It will be effective in fall so there are young players in pro now who would be avail to U SPORTS roster in fall.
 
From Darren Dreger Xwitter:

An interesting rule change will be announced by U Sports. Hockey players who have played pro will be eligible to play U SPORTS with no sit out period (was 365 days). It will be effective in fall so there are young players in pro now who would be avail to U SPORTS roster in fall.
You should apply for a job at Sportsnet at this rate .
 
From Darren Dreger Xwitter:

An interesting rule change will be announced by U Sports. Hockey players who have played pro will be eligible to play U SPORTS with no sit out period (was 365 days). It will be effective in fall so there are young players in pro now who would be avail to U SPORTS roster in fall.
The way his second tweet is worded makes me think that multi year pro guys will be allowed . I’m all for it .
 
I wonder if we see rule changes to the CHL Package?
It might benefit them to keep guys in Junior with the opportunity to play pro after Jr with the ability to still get an education and play hockey after .
 
I’d also be curious if a guy who played a year or two of CIS and left on a pro deal and decided they wanted to come back could?
Using him only as an example but say Simon Pinard decided he wanted to go back to school next year?
 
Wonder if you play a full pro season your first year out of junior, will you maintain all five years of eligibility or get docked for that year?
That's a pretty important item to clarify.

From USports just now:


U SPORTS announces eligibility reforms in men’s hockey

March 11, 2025
U SPORTS announced changes to its rules regarding professional participation in men’s hockey on Tuesday, which will provide greater flexibility for potential incoming student-athletes. Starting with the 2025-26 season, incoming student-athletes who have played professional hockey will be allowed to participate immediately in U SPORTS men’s hockey without a waiting period.
This change modifies the previous rule that required former professional players to wait 365 days before becoming eligible to play university men’s hockey. In addition, any professional participation before August 15 of the year a player turns 22 will not count toward their U SPORTS eligibility.
Note that the January 10 roster deadline, standard across all leagues sanctioned by Hockey Canada, still applies. A player who plays outside of U SPORTS after January 10, either professionally or as an amateur, may not join a U SPORTS team in that season.
“We are pleased to announce these steps today as a significant evolution in our efforts to ensure the highest quality of U SPORTS men’s hockey programs nationwide,” said Pierre Arsenault, Chief Executive Officer of U SPORTS. “University hockey in Canada has a rich history of providing exceptional experiences and opportunities for elite players, and we have been collaborating closely with the conferences and our members to enhance and strengthen our role in the hockey system.”
The 35 U SPORTS men’s hockey programs, which compete in three conferences across Canada from Vancouver to Halifax, consistently attract top-level players after their junior hockey careers. The Canadian university experience is renowned for its respected and well-established coaching in supportive environments that foster ongoing development and academic success.
U SPORTS hockey experiences often lead to professional opportunities for players, including the NHL, after participating in the Canadian circuit. This occurs while the student-athlete receives a world-class Canadian university education.
"It is every hockey players’ dream to play professional hockey,” said Brett Gibson, head men’s hockey coach at Queen’s University. “We offer a place where players can continue to develop on and off the ice to meet their goals. U SPORTS allowing players to return after a year of professional hockey is a very progressive move, and it will continue to grow our product across the country. Players now have more choices, and U SPORTS hockey is an excellent choice for any hockey player."
The announcement comes as U SPORTS is just nine days away from the 2025 BioSteel University Cup. The eight-team, single elimination tournament will feature the host Ottawa Gee-Gees along with Saskatchewan, Mount Royal, Toronto Metropolitan, Concordia, UNB, Moncton and the OUA bronze medallist, who will be determined on Saturday. Action at The Arena at TD Place begins on Thursday, March 20 at 1 p.m., and continues through to the gold medal game, set for 5 p.m. on Sunday, March 23. Tickets are available at usportstickets.ca, and the games will be broadcast on CBC’s digital platforms in English and Radio-Canada’s digital platforms in French.
 
I’d also be curious if a guy who played a year or two of CIS and left on a pro deal and decided they wanted to come back could?
Using him only as an example but say Simon Pinard decided he wanted to go back to school next year?
I think they can now, no? As long as they have enough eligibility left + sit out a year....basically what Ryan Lindsay did.

I was thinking of a guy like Nic Guay...left UNB during the 2021-2022 Christmas break when the AUS paused competition due to a COVID spike, but didn't have a point in 16 AHL games. He's since done pretty decent in the ECHL, but this may have been very appealing to him at the time.
 
Last edited:
I think they can now, no? As long as they have enough eligibility left + sit out a year....basically what Ryan Lindsay did.

I was thinking of a guy like Nic Guay...left UNB during the 2021-2022 Christmas break when the AUS paused competition due to a COVID spike, but didn't have a point in 16 AHL games. He's since done pretty decent in the ECHL, but this may have been very appealing to him at the time.
I was more wondering if they could come back and pickup where they left off without sitting , wasn’t sure if guys who had already used eligibility would be treated differently but reading the new rule it seems pretty wide open .
 
I was more wondering if they could come back and pickup where they left off without sitting , wasn’t sure if guys who had already used eligibility would be treated differently but reading the new rule it seems pretty wide open .
The way I read it, you can be 25 years old, have played 3 years pro and can go to a school with 2 years remaining.

I think the best thing to do is not worry about stacking UNB with guys who left a year or two ago.

UNB will get the "best" guys out there under this new rule. I'm sure there are lots of guys out there.
 
Realistically, is this change going to have THAT much of an impact? Or will we just see the same handful of guys who used to come at Christmas come over the summer instead? I'm sure there are a few every year who opted to stay in pro after Christmas who wished they went university instead, but at the end of the day, what are we talking about? Less than 10 players maybe? Or am I severely underestimating this change?
 
I wonder if we see rule changes to the CHL Package?
It might benefit them to keep guys in Junior with the opportunity to play pro after Jr with the ability to still get an education and play hockey after .
This is very important - generally, playing a certain amount of Pro Hockey did impact your package.

Also - leaving Jr to go pro (and likely ending your continuing education courses at the same time) ended your package.

I'm sure the CHL wants to fund kids (it looks good), but they have generally required their members to keep their education up-to-date. Not something most 2-3 year pros do.
 
The way I read it, you can be 25 years old, have played 3 years pro and can go to a school with 2 years remaining.
Agree - you still lose 1-year of eligibility for each year of Pro, but the clock doesn't start until the August of the year you turn 22. So, no Sydney Crosby, but some of the other kids can play ECHL for an entire season then come to USPORTS (or Europe).

Not sure if this means more Colin Beardsmore's will start coming to USPORTS, but someone like Kade Landry could return (not sure he would still have access to his package though).

Overall - I really like this change provided it's explained well in the Eligibility Guide. Always keen on helping kids get a degree.
 
Realistically, is this change going to have THAT much of an impact? Or will we just see the same handful of guys who used to come at Christmas come over the summer instead? I'm sure there are a few every year who opted to stay in pro after Christmas who wished they went university instead, but at the end of the day, what are we talking about? Less than 10 players maybe? Or am I severely underestimating this change?
No one knows. Let's wait to see how it unfolds. While it's fun to speculate sometimes, until we actually see some names, it's just speculation.
 
If they play like that, Moncton is going to be a dangerous team at Nationals. I thought Mike and Dave made a good point on the broadcast, last year they were a young team who hadn't been to the UCup in ages. They were playing a really tough UQTR team so maybe a bit of that "just happy to be there" attitude. I think their expectations are going to be a lot higher this year.
 
If they play like that, Moncton is going to be a dangerous team at Nationals. I thought Mike and Dave made a good point on the broadcast, last year they were a young team who hadn't been to the UCup in ages. They were playing a really tough UQTR team so maybe a bit of that "just happy to be there" attitude. I think their expectations are going to be a lot higher this year.

I would rather play any other team in the final than Les Aigles. They know what they need to do to beat the Reds. I don’t want to give them another opportunity.

UNB did it to them back in 2007.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dm8895

Ad

Ad