Chiarelli
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2019
- 4,164
- 5,670
FYI - looked into if anyone has ever won the Art Ross, Hart, Smythe, and Stanley Cup in a season. Three players have done it one time:
-Lafleur
-Orr
-Gretzky
-Lafleur
-Orr
-Gretzky
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerReminds me of a joke I heard down in Healy about the time a black bear wandered into the bar. Walked over to the counter and said, "I'd like a.........draft beer."Delete
But did any of the ever win a Lady Byng?FYI - looked into if anyone has ever won the Art Ross, Hart, Smythe, and Stanley Cup in a season. Three players have done it one time:
-Lafleur
-Orr
-Gretzky
We're not the only ones thinking it...Even if heiskanen returns, gotta hope Harley plays himself to the ground. Then it'll just be a recovering heiskanen and drained Harley
I tried to copy the NHL graphic on Harley’s stats but it didn’t show correctly. Hence the ‘delete’. Sorry! I don’t know how the Stars are going to keep up defensively if Miro is out.Reminds me of a joke I heard down in Healy about the time a black bear wandered into the bar. Walked over to the counter and said, "I'd like a.........draft beer."
Bartender responded, "What's with the big paws?"
Literally adding 50 more AHL caliber players to the league.Water down the league more!!!
Can't wait.
It's a business so I get it. However, purely from a hockey quality pov there already are way too many teams.Literally adding 50 more AHL caliber players to the league.
How? Great players not playing in the NHL because of the cap?The hard cap is more of an issue in terms of "watering down the league" than two extra teams is.
What's your logic with your comment in bold? Isn't expansion more beneficial (or rather, less harmful) for teams that aren't contenders? Contenders have spent years assembling picks, drafting, trading, etc to build a deep roster, and then they have to give quality players away right as they've completed their build. As a fan of a contender I don't want my teams roster to be weakened during contending years.We will never see watering down of the league like there was when Minnesota, Lumbus, and Nashville all joined up in quick succession. On top of some absolutely horrid NHL players on those teams that was roughly the time when you could tackle players and the refs wouldn't call it, and the NHL still thought it was a great idea to let teams pile entire rosters behind the net and take away long-bomb passes.
The league is much better at finding talent (NCAA FAs, Euro FAs, etc.) than they were before, the game is much more opened up, and of course the expansion rules make it so teams have to give up a top four defender, goalie, or third line forward. Previously those expansion clubs had to settle for table scraps. The cap lends itself to more parity as well (Vegas took full advantage, Seattle, for various reasons, did not).
Besides, keep in mind during that period, the Avs won the Cup. I don't mind there being a little watering down taking place while the Avs might still be at least competitive, if not still going for it.
I don't really care if the overall talent level of the league goes down a notch via expansion, when most of the teams are more or less the same anyways, that's what I'm trying to say.How? Great players not playing in the NHL because of the cap?
You’ll always be 100% looking back.Dorofeyev 30 goal scorer. Let's see who the Avs took instead. *checks notes ahhhh Steinburg the nepo pick. Lovely.
I almost completely agree with you, but I'll play devil's advocate here. I think more top-heavy teams that only have to expose questionable contracts and replacement level players will probably benefit a bit from it eroding the depth of other contendersWhat's your logic with your comment in bold? Isn't expansion more beneficial (or rather, less harmful) for teams that aren't contenders? Contenders have spent years assembling picks, drafting, trading, etc to build a deep roster, and then they have to give quality players away right as they've completed their build. As a fan of a contender I don't want my teams roster to be weakened during contending years.
It prevents super teams because you can't pay everyone.How? Great players not playing in the NHL because of the cap?
Not really since the NHL has more internationals playing in it than the other four major NA sports. NBA has more unique "locations or countries," but I saw a stat that NHL has more amount of non-NA players playing. I think hockey is the only sport that could expand that is not the MLS due to its player-base.Literally adding 50 more AHL caliber players to the league.
Not really since the NHL has more internationals playing in it than the other four major NA sports. NBA has more unique "locations or countries," but I saw a stat that NHL has more amount of non-NA players playing. I think hockey is the only sport that could expand that is not the MLS due to its player-base.
This will increase scoring again though.
He was passed over how many times? Kaprisov? Same thing. I get it, would have been nice to get lucky like that. I just don’t really get it. So many variables that you just can’t predict with a 17-18-19 year old kid
Not talking about players from Argentina vs Gibraltar, but there are a ton of Swedes, Finns, Latvians, Czechs, Suisse, and Russians that can play on the bottom six of an expansion team IMHO. It isn't top talent, but provides solid depth.I hate to break it to you, but 99% of these dudes playing in Europe suck ass and are not NHL quality.
I know you like the pre-Olympic and WJC group Z teams like Afghanistan vs. Botswana, but this is the reality. These guys are all trash.