just make it 16 teams like the senior wc. there is enough quality.
belarus, latvia, norway, denmark, kazakshan and france.
And you could have a team with a losing record winning Gold.What they could do is to place the big five (USA, Canada, Russia, Finland and Sweden) in the same group and guarantee all those five teams from that group a spot in the quaterfinal after group stage. Then the six rest can fight for three quarterfinal spots, and the bottom two teams in this group will be relegated. Same thing as they do in womens olympics tournament since the gap is so huge.
That way you get more even games in the group stage, and avoid blowouts and still three qf spots to fight for in the group with six teams.
What they could do is to place the big five (USA, Canada, Russia, Finland and Sweden) in the same group and guarantee all those five teams from that group a spot in the quaterfinal after group stage. Then the six rest can fight for three quarterfinal spots, and the bottom two teams in this group will be relegated. Same thing as they do in womens olympics tournament since the gap is so huge.
That way you get more even games in the group stage, and avoid blowouts and still three qf spots to fight for in the group with six teams.
I imagine this will also be played in a bubble with the next variant that will come.
Been dreaming of this for 4 years to go. I don't think Canadians can even go to Russia as of right now, who knows in 2022 even.
Similar format been used for World Championships back in 1980s. Back then, Worlds were just one host-city tournament, circulating in same cities for decades, with interest and attendance inevitable falling down. Everyone hated to play in empty Wiener Stadthalle once in a decade. Finally in late 80s co-hosting the tournament gave a chance to smaller towns to participate (Sodertslje, Fribourg) which turned out to be much needed boost to tournament and organisers never looked back. 2 cities format not only opened the doors to smaller towns, but also allowed to change format by splitting teams into groups, and also set a foundation for future expansions or even co-hosting by 2 different countries.11 teams, everyone plays everyone, then the top 2 play a final game?
Similar format been used for World Championships back in 1980s. Back then, Worlds were just one host-city tournament, circulating in same cities for decades, with interest and attendance inevitable falling down. Everyone hated to play in empty Wiener Stadthalle once in a decade. Finally in late 80s co-hosting the tournament gave a chance to smaller towns to participate (Sodertslje, Fribourg) which turned out to be much needed boost to tournament and organisers never looked back. 2 cities format not only opened the doors to smaller towns, but also allowed to change format by splitting teams into groups, and also set a foundation for future expansions or even co-hosting by 2 different countries.
just make it 16 teams like the senior wc. there is enough quality.
belarus, latvia, norway, denmark, kazakshan and france.
That was most forgiving format ever, in 1988 edition Sweden with 3 losses finished ahead of unbeaten Soviets on goal differential 1987 Ice Hockey World Championships - WikipediaI also think that groups and a playoff type of round adds more excitement to the tournament so I doubt they would go back to the everyone plays everyone, then top 2 play in a final.