Whoever has a chance to get Mbappe, can't pass on it.
I know City's the flavor of the moment, and Madrid was last season, but Benz, Vini, Haaland... None are as good as Mbappe IMO.
You get him. And then you work around it. Maybe play Rodrygo as striker or something.
Maybe get some oldie a la Giroud to serve until they get more funds for a long term one.
But you don't pass on Mbappe. You just don't.
I imagine Madrid is his first choice still, especially with a really strong French contingent there.
I think Perez is ready to pay him. It's his dream signing and he's been high on him since Mbappe broke through with Monaco.Can't forget about the issue of money though. Not only the fee, but if you've got any kind of attempt at wage structure, that's going to be thrown right off as well. Dude ain't comin' somewhere to not get paid like the best player in the world. So there's really not a lot of choices, which leads me to wonder what he feels his options are, because you don't leave if you don't have more than one or you end up kinda stuck like Messi was.
Barca is in trouble for its own doing. Tebas is also punishing them and not budging because its barca. Everyone has tightened their belt post covid. Not contesting the rest.You for real? Madrid don't have the same issues because they've managed their money better in the last 10-15 years. For every Hazard and Jovic, they've had 10 good buys and they've sold their players well.
They've barely spent for 3 years, especially once COVID hit and only spent big last season on Tchouameni. Hazard, Benz, Asensio, etc... all gone, takes off a considerable amount from their wage bill too.
Barca has only themselves to blame. Don't even try and play victim here how someone's after you or changing the rules to make it work for Madrid.
Aside from the occasional blunder (Jovic, Hazard), Madrid's transfer policy has been exemplary for a long while now.
This article is from the end of last season, so before the Tchoumaneni purchase, but it gives you an indication of what Madrid did in the last 10 years, they're not even in the top 20 clubs in terms of net spend.
Man Utd, Liverpool, Barcelona, PSG: 20 clubs with highest net spend since 2012
Man United, Liverpool, PSG, Man City and Barcelona all feature in list of the 20 clubs with the highest net spend in the last decade.www.givemesport.com
A notable absentee from the list is Real Madrid. Los Blancos' net spend in the past decade is just £-114.26m, the 38th highest of any club in the world.
what do you think of that? good signing?PSG close to signing Kang In Lee.
We'll see.what do you think of that? good signing?
I agree. They managed much much better they finances
In any cases, can't see how they can spend so much money on Bellingham, Mbappe, all the other kids, Havertz, etc
Can't forget about the issue of money though. Not only the fee, but if you've got any kind of attempt at wage structure, that's going to be thrown right off as well. Dude ain't comin' somewhere to not get paid like the best player in the world. So there's really not a lot of choices, which leads me to wonder what he feels his options are, because you don't leave if you don't have more than one or you end up kinda stuck like Messi was.
Apparently both BVB and Chelsea were both looking at that Faye kid that Barca signed.