NotABadPeriod
ForFriendshipDikembe
- Oct 28, 2006
- 54,008
- 11,198
Mauch went earlier to Tampa Bay.Jones and Mauch. Think there's a C from Ohio State that someone I follow for football prospects knowledge likes as well.
Mauch went earlier to Tampa Bay.Jones and Mauch. Think there's a C from Ohio State that someone I follow for football prospects knowledge likes as well.
Dawand would next level shock meDawand Jones is still out there, isn't he? Along with a bunch of athletic guys we've already discussed.
This is the area where I'd be absolutely fine taking a swing on Jones.
A good friend of mine in a Lions fan. We watched yesterday together.I hope Hooker becomes a star for the Lions bros
Looks like it's indeed medical for Washington:
CYBORG!
![]()
Who is O’Cyrus Torrence? Buffalo Bills add ‘Cyborg’ OL who allowed no sacks in college (5 things to know)
'Cybo' has a chance to be a day one starter for the Bills.www.newyorkupstate.com
He sucks at guard, so why not?Torrence has zero potential to play C. So having Bates play there behind Morse (and possibly replacing him in future) might be a shout.
My money would be on him not being, unless they definitively want Bates full time back C. But that's mostly because they have a lot of depth there and it'll be a serious scheme adjustment for Torrence.If Torrence isn't a day one starter... It means we'll be in extremely good shape.
Bates does not suck at guard, not at all.He sucks at guard, so why not?
I find it much more stunning that Goff is still only 28 than I do that Hooker is 26. How is that possible. He’s got to be 50.Lions get their QB of the future that is.... 2 years younger than their QB of the now
I believe Jaq Roy is someone the Bills were connected to, could be an option here in the third
swing guard at worst and Ike is likely cut/PSMy money would be on him not being, unless they definitively want Bates full time back C. But that's mostly because they have a lot of depth there and it'll be a serious scheme adjustment for Torrence.
Bates does not suck at guard, not at all.
i hate when people give info like this and leave out the most obvious question people will have. Who was #1?
i hate when people give info like this and leave out the most obvious question people will have. Who was #1?