Yeah that’s right. He isn’t. He’s physical like Timo was physical. He’s not throwing his body around but he’s strong and hard to push off the puck. He can and will use his strength to get to the net. He will get in front of the net and get in scrums. He’s not going to be chasing hits though which I’ll be honest I don’t want my top 6 forwards doing anyway,From what I have heard he isn’t really a huge physical presence despite the size.
Yeah that’s perfect. Not interested in guys like that because most of the time coaches will play that up instead of building the other aspects of their gameYeah that’s right. He isn’t. He’s physical like Timo was physical. He’s not throwing his body around but he’s strong and hard to push off the puck. He can and will use his strength to get to the net. He will get in front of the net and get in scrums. He’s not going to be chasing hits though which I’ll be honest I don’t want my top 6 forwards doing anyway,
No idea what this is based on but Musty looks very promising.
When you're worse than the top-line winger at your wing position but better than the other top-line winger on the off-wing? So basically the second best winger who's on the second line due to being the "wrong" wingWhy doesn't it say "First line" and "Second line" or is there a Top 6 position which is not First line but also not 2nd line. Confusing.
I read it as this, and will use wingers as examplesWhy doesn't it say "First line" and "Second line" or is there a Top 6 position which is not First line but also not 2nd line. Confusing.
Evander Kane should be considered a 1st line winger.I read it as this, and will use wingers as examples
1st line - Top player (Rantanen)
Top 6 - effective complement on either scoring line (E. Kane)
Bottom 6 - Good 3rd liner who might have reduced minutes on a deep team, can;'t hang in offense-heavy roles (Goodrow)
Replacement - Tops out at 4th line (Reaves)
If you're a contending team, having Kane as a top-line winger is a bit of a gamble...Evander Kane should be considered a 1st line winger.
Idk, he has the skills to be but he never has produced over 60pts for various reasons. Hard to say that's top line productionEvander Kane should be considered a 1st line winger.
Probably for the same reasons that fans that follow and keep track of prospect progress wanted him in london.Is it known why he wanted to be traded?
Because Sudbury had a shitty coaching staff.Is it known why he wanted to be traded?
I think you're being dramaticMaybe i'm being dramatic, but i think Musty has lost his chance to be a contributing NHLer, to no fault of his own. Mark him down as another promising player whose development was stunted by the AHL/CHL agreement or whatever its called. There's almost no chance he makes any meaningful progression to his overall game this year, and that sucks.
He's not the first player to have this happen to them, but he might be the last.
If you see Musty as a high-end NHLer, who can lean on his scoring and offensive gifts to carry the day, then you have a point. He dominated the CHL, and now has to waste a year where he could be learning how to dominate the AHL.Maybe i'm being dramatic, but i think Musty has lost his chance to be a contributing NHLer, to no fault of his own. Mark him down as another promising player whose development was stunted by the AHL/CHL agreement or whatever its called. There's almost no chance he makes any meaningful progression to his overall game this year, and that sucks.
He's not the first player to have this happen to them, but he might be the last.
lol, no, let's see in a couple of years. If anything, this should teach him.Maybe i'm being dramatic, but i think Musty has lost his chance to be a contributing NHLer, to no fault of his own. Mark him down as another promising player whose development was stunted by the AHL/CHL agreement or whatever its called. There's almost no chance he makes any meaningful progression to his overall game this year, and that sucks.
He's not the first player to have this happen to them, but he might be the last.