They share backwards thinking, but getting Carlsson or Fantilli does offset the risk a bit. IMO Smith doesn’t. He is the most likely to not make an impact at the NHL level. Having said that, he’s a much better prospect than Leonard/Reinbacher imo.
These scouts make poor decisions on archaic information year after year. How many passed on Caufield? Who cares? it was obvious that caufield was an elite sniper, yet these bozos couldn’t get over his height. Same shit, different year. This doesn’t validate our decision to pass on him.
There is some risk with Michkov, for sure, but at a certain number the drop off in talent makes selecting him a no brainer. I think that drop off actually starts at 4 with Smith.