Roy should have been dealt and Clarke should be in his spot. That's the failure.
sure again, i feel you're using my post to go on a tangent about something i wasn't even saying
so i can agree with your statements
the only thing i am saying, with the series 3-1 going to EDM, it's pretty much done. This kings team can't win 3 in a row, let alone vs an Edmonton team that owns their 1-3-1 system
So, (now this is the part that caused the confusion here), wouldn't it be cooool, if we just plugged in Clarke to gain some experience AND to scratch Dubois so that at least the coaching staff sends out a message to upper management that you know, you can't go in '24-25 with Dubois as your highest paid forward
and you come at me with strategies about McDavid, and RDs and etc.
at this point, it doesn't matter if we lose the game 2-1 or 10-2 it really doesn't
The humiliation is in full force. Maybe your eyeballs seeing a 10-2 loss will cause them to leak salty liquids, but I'm saying your eyeballs should have already been doing that a long while ago
So the result of that game does not matter
What matters, is thinking ahead
hope this is clearer