Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,031
- 55,498
He's +1 on a team that outscored their opponent 13-4 over 3 games.I watched most of the game. He did his job and the team won. It's nice to see him finish +2 with an assist, but those results were not the products of offence he generated.
I see a player who's been asked to play within a conservative team structure and is doing just that. He had a few opportunistic offensive flashes, but he's not taking risks the way he did last year.
Yeah definition of a non factor lol.He's +1 on a team that outscored their opponent 13-4 over 3 games.
Buium in the final 4. He is a big part of that team's success. 2g 3a +3 in 2 games in the NCAA tournamentYeah definition of a non factor lol.
While the guys we selected him
Over are the absolute star, alpha dogs on their team
But how tall is he?Buium in the final 4. He is a big part of that team's success. 2g 3a +3 in 2 games in the NCAA tournament
6’0 186 at the combine.But how tall is he?
alpha dogs in junior league have nothing to do with nhl lolYeah definition of a non factor lol.
While the guys we selected him
Over are the absolute star, alpha dogs on their team
I was being facetious with the height comment. But yeah you might be right. Seems like they had their top 3 ish and then Yakemchuk and Beaudoin lol6’0 186 at the combine.
They wanted a RD, I don’t think there was much debate between the other guys, I think Yak was their only target
Pretty much every star player in the NHL was the guy in junioralpha dogs in junior league have nothing to do with nhl lol
Nail Yakupov,?Pretty much every star player in the NHL was the guy in junior
What does he have to do with anything, he wasn’t a star player in the NHLNail Yakupov,?
you could just say, there are enough junior league stars who have achieved little in the NHLWhat does he have to do with anything, he wasn’t a star player in the NHL
He’s saying guys who are stars in the NHL were the stars in junior, not that every star on junior is a star in the NHL
There are tons of stars in juniors who aren’t stars in the NHL, but a lot more who weren’t stars in juniors (Which I’d say Yak is a star in the ClHL)who aren’t stats in the NHL
You could, you could say that about guys who aren’t stars too, even more so.you could just say, there are enough junior league stars who have achieved little in the NHL
No problem. Zach HymanYou could, you could say that about guys who aren’t stars too, even more so.
That wasn’t what you were responding to though, you just just went on a completely different tangent.
Not sure how you are arguing your side in this one other than just for the verbal diarrheayou could just say, there are enough junior league stars who have achieved little in the NHL
I can say the same about you.Not sure how you are arguing your side in this one other than just for the verbal diarrhea
I mean, I wasn’t looking for an outlier, of course there are guys who weren’t stars on junior who were in the NHL. It’s just something that has much, much, much less precedence.No problem. Zach Hyman
You could but it would be more indefensible bsI can say the same about you.
You're getting the cause and effect mixed up. The main thing is that good statistics in junior leagues in no way ensures a transition to the NHL.I mean, I wasn’t looking for an outlier, of course there are guys who weren’t stars on junior who were in the NHL. It’s just something that has much, much, much less precedence.
Hyman was over 2ppg his last year in Junior A and had 54 points his last year in the NCAA
Hagel is the one who fits that bill this year.
Not sure what that has to do with anything though other than showing that of the top 50 scorers 1 wasn’t a star in junior (his 102 points was in overage year, but it was an overage year). It strengthens the position Burrowsauros was holding.
ManYou're getting the cause and effect mixed up. The main thing is that good statistics in junior leagues in no way ensures a transition to the NHL.
Pretty much every star player in the NHL was the guy in junior