2023-24 Senators Prospect Watch

I watched most of the game. He did his job and the team won. It's nice to see him finish +2 with an assist, but those results were not the products of offence he generated.

I see a player who's been asked to play within a conservative team structure and is doing just that. He had a few opportunistic offensive flashes, but he's not taking risks the way he did last year.
He's +1 on a team that outscored their opponent 13-4 over 3 games.
 
6’0 186 at the combine.

They wanted a RD, I don’t think there was much debate between the other guys, I think Yak was their only target
I was being facetious with the height comment. But yeah you might be right. Seems like they had their top 3 ish and then Yakemchuk and Beaudoin lol
 
RD probably played a role in taking Yakemchuk, but his toughness and physicality might have been an even bigger factor in the selection.

He was really the only player in our range, besides maybe Silayev (but we don't draft out of Russia), that brought the size, physicality and PIMs our scouting staff demands.

You look through Don Boyd's draft history as head scout for the Jackets and you'll see he picked a player with high PIM totals with every single pick he had in the top 2 rounds from 2000-2005 (resulting in an absolutely terrible track record), and this continued last draft with Yakemchuk and Eliasson.

Just an overwhelming obsession with physicality and toughness that almost destroyed the Jackets franchise and will do significant harm to our future as well.
 
Nail Yakupov,?
What does he have to do with anything, he wasn’t a star player in the NHL

He’s saying guys who are stars in the NHL were the stars in junior, not that every star on junior is a star in the NHL

There are tons of stars in juniors who aren’t stars in the NHL, but a lot more who weren’t stars in juniors (Which I’d say Yak is a star in the CHL)who aren’t stars in the NHL

Obviously being a star in junior has a much higher correlation to being a star in the NHL than not being a star in junior, that’s just common sense
 
Last edited:
What does he have to do with anything, he wasn’t a star player in the NHL

He’s saying guys who are stars in the NHL were the stars in junior, not that every star on junior is a star in the NHL

There are tons of stars in juniors who aren’t stars in the NHL, but a lot more who weren’t stars in juniors (Which I’d say Yak is a star in the ClHL)who aren’t stats in the NHL
you could just say, there are enough junior league stars who have achieved little in the NHL
 
you could just say, there are enough junior league stars who have achieved little in the NHL
You could, you could say that about guys who aren’t stars too, even more so.

That wasn’t what you were responding to though, you just just went on a completely different tangent.
 
Yakemchuk named to the WHL Eastern Conference 2nd All-Star team, which, as I understand it, means he is one of the 4 D in the WHL East with the prettiest hair
1743619623670.png
 
No problem. Zach Hyman
I mean, I wasn’t looking for an outlier, of course there are guys who weren’t stars on junior who were in the NHL. It’s just something that has much, much, much less precedence.

Hyman was over 2ppg his last year in Junior A and had 54 points his last year in the NCAA

Hagel is the one who fits that bill this year.

Not sure what that has to do with anything though other than showing that of the top 50 scorers 1 wasn’t a star in junior (his 102 points was in overage year, but it was an overage year). It strengthens the position Burrowsauros was holding.
 
Last edited:
I mean, I wasn’t looking for an outlier, of course there are guys who weren’t stars on junior who were in the NHL. It’s just something that has much, much, much less precedence.

Hyman was over 2ppg his last year in Junior A and had 54 points his last year in the NCAA

Hagel is the one who fits that bill this year.

Not sure what that has to do with anything though other than showing that of the top 50 scorers 1 wasn’t a star in junior (his 102 points was in overage year, but it was an overage year). It strengthens the position Burrowsauros was holding.
You're getting the cause and effect mixed up. The main thing is that good statistics in junior leagues in no way ensures a transition to the NHL.
 
You're getting the cause and effect mixed up. The main thing is that good statistics in junior leagues in no way ensures a transition to the NHL.
Man

That isn’t even what’s being discussed :laugh:
Pretty much every star player in the NHL was the guy in junior

We are talking about a known quantity, stars in the NHL. Of those, 95+% were the “alpha” (the term used) guys on their teams and leagues. We aren’t saying that being a star in junior means you’ll have success in the NHL, that was just you misunderstanding things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xspyrit

Ad

Ad