ru4reals
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2007
- 11,895
- 7,546
This is what I mean. Refs need their knees caved in for this bullshit they pull.15 seconds before the penalty
Besides Fialas stupid pnealty why on earth did Doughty over commit on that play ?
Ya. saw that.. but Danault passed into his skates. Why they so f-ing scared to put out Clarke.. TALENT.. they are talent phobicI want to know why Gav was leading the rush without the puck, and then goes offsides.
I want to know why Gav was leading the rush without the puck, and then goes offsides.
I don't want to give up anymore assets for a black hole team, but this team desperately needs right-shot goal-scorer inserted into the lineup to balance things up and increase the offensive chances. You have a converted left shot center with 1 career goal in 25 games playing with the teams two best offensive players, it just makes no sense. And taking nothing away from Turcotte, he has earned a roster spot way over guys like JAD, Lewis and Lizotte, but lets get guys into spots where they are maximized.
Byfield - Kopitar - Fagemo
Moore- Danault - Fiala
Turcotte - PLD - Lafierriere
It seems like Clarke is only in the lineup for PP and in-case they are behind in the 3rd and need instant offense, it still seems odd to me to not play him more when you are missing so much offense, but I'm guessing they feel hes not helping the grind it out defense first style they are trying to play now.
The better question is, why is he out there in OT to begin with? I think he's an excellent defenseman, but 3 on 3 is not exactly the type of game where he is best used.
Im fine with the 11/7 - they seem to be playing better using this approach with all these guys out - injecting a top 6 fwd onto the 4th line.. ups the overall talent level. They just need to stop being pansies and unleash Clarke.
this is why i really, really hope AEG pulls the plug on the FO, coaches and all in the offseasonI don't want to give up anymore assets for a black hole team, but this team desperately needs right-shot goal-scorer inserted into the lineup to balance things up and increase the offensive chances. You have a converted left shot center with 1 career goal in 25 games playing with the teams two best offensive players, it just makes no sense. And taking nothing away from Turcotte, he has earned a roster spot way over guys like JAD, Lewis and Lizotte, but lets get guys into spots where they are maximized.
Byfield - Kopitar - Fagemo
Moore- Danault - Fiala
Turcotte - PLD - Lafierriere
It seems like Clarke is only in the lineup for PP and in-case they are behind in the 3rd and need instant offense, it still seems odd to me to not play him more when you are missing so much offense, but I'm guessing they feel hes not helping the grind it out defense first style they are trying to play now.
The better question is, why is he out there in OT to begin with? I think he's an excellent defenseman, but 3 on 3 is not exactly the type of game where he is best used.
I smell eucalyptus still emanating from this coaching staff... Hiller is def an improvement but not that greatI was was just as surprised. Where was Clarke? They looked like they were playing not to lose in OT. And they lost every draw in OT.
Honestly it’s possible. And it’s important to mention that Bluc brought in Todd to have him play 1-3-1. They said so themselves.With the way they still roll out the 1-3-1 and how they refuse to play Byfield in OT, I wonder if BLuc are making the coaching decisions.
It's not that crazy if you consider the fact that management is inept at their jobs and don't want to play Clarke for fear that he'll hit his bonuses which has cap implications going forward and our genius GM has already spent all of his cap money on forwards, leaving no money to do anything else but overpay the Kings' 2024 1st round pick for another forward.7 min a night for clarke again. Crazy to me.
I can’t remember all the rules but can’t bonuses be deferred from a cap perspective? So any bonuses he hits can count against next years cap instead. Not ideal but it would mange this years issues. It may not apply in all contract situations though so maybe someone more knowledgeable on the subject can confirm if I’m correct.It's not that crazy if you consider the fact that management is inept at their jobs and don't want to play Clarke for fear that he'll hit his bonuses which has cap implications going forward and our genius GM has already spent all of his cap money on forwards, leaving no money to do anything else but overpay the Kings' 2024 1st round pick for another forward.
It makes total sense!
It is possible, but that is why we are saying the cap is badly mismanaged. They are struggling with next seasons capI can’t remember all the rules but can’t bonuses be deferred from a cap perspective? So any bonuses he hits can count against next years cap instead. Not ideal but it would mange this years issues. It may not apply in all contract situations though so maybe someone more knowledgeable on the subject can confirm if I’m correct.