TCB
Registered User
Yep, No Brainer for me with Bussi in the pipeline, spend that money elsewhere.I’d trade Ullmark for I think it’s a huge waste of the asset to hold on to him. Especially with the raise Swayman is about to get
Yep, No Brainer for me with Bussi in the pipeline, spend that money elsewhere.I’d trade Ullmark for I think it’s a huge waste of the asset to hold on to him. Especially with the raise Swayman is about to get
But you need to make sure Swayman will sign before giving up Linus, big risk otherwise to end up with neither of them come the off seasonI’d trade Ullmark for I think it’s a huge waste of the asset to hold on to him. Especially with the raise Swayman is about to get
Did GW say that? Seeler is a good start toward that end IMO.
Why are they trading CarloTwo reasons….
1. They can trade for a Carlo replacement
2. They can sign a Carlo replacement via FA
Now, maybe the better play is to move Lindholm if Hanifin comes here….but Carlo might be easier to move b/c of Contract.
Exactly! Say Swayman starts game one has a 38 save shutout performance, Montgomery would be a fool to go with Ullmark in game two.Other issue is what happens if Swayman keeps trending to .920 and Ulmark to .905.
Right now it's .919 and .909. One more game like recently and Linus is gonna be around .905
A 50-50 split makes little sense in that world of razor tight competition, specially in the playoffs.
That's where it gets a little complicated as far as dealing Ullmark. Imo I think Swayman signs here and he's an RFA, but its no guarantee. The longer Sweeney waits on Dealing linus the less leverage he has because other teams know he needs to move him or lose out on Bussi and with Swayman more than likely getting a big raise your not going to spend that kind of money on two goalies, but if U cant come to an agreement with Swayman as you said then what ? lol. its Too bad Sweeney hasn't gotten ahead of the game on this one and has a signed Swayman already.But you need to make sure Swayman will sign before giving up Linus, big risk otherwise to end up with neither of them come the off season
Trade Lindholm here today and your trading him for pennies on the dollar compared to what they gave up to get him less than 2 years ago.
Who is this "Physical Carlo Replacement"? Does that player even exist who is somewhat proven and also available?
For starters if they brought in a couple of McQuaid/Miller/Boychuk likes, people wont be as conscience that Carlo needs to be that big badass back there. He's not that type of player. He's a very good solid number 4 defenseman, trading him and not getting a reliable top 4 right-side defenseman back or having one in the pipeline would be down right lunacy imo.
I was speaking in the off season. But Sway is an rfa so he’s not going anywhereBut you need to make sure Swayman will sign before giving up Linus, big risk otherwise to end up with neither of them come the off season
IIRC he's at $775K
Joel Edmundson for a 5th at 259:59 3/8/25Will Sweeney make his moves a few days before the deadline like he has in the past?
Carlo after a Bruins loss:
my mother used to tell me ‘good centers don’t go on trees’It's hard to win with ok middle center depth. You need above average.
You will not see a 4m shut down 6-5 defenseman hit the market very oftenTwo reasons….
1. They can trade for a Carlo replacement
2. They can sign a Carlo replacement via FA
Now, maybe the better play is to move Lindholm if Hanifin comes here….but Carlo might be easier to move b/c of Contract.
That’s why we need Lysell & Poitras to hit - smaller skilled guys like Montreal used to have good identityAgreed, the biggest issue with this team is a lack of identity and Seeler is the type of guy who would help them towards that “tough to play against” style Neely preaches for
Wise hockey coach, that mom.my mother used to tell me ‘good centers don’t go on trees’
Remember games 3 & 4 in Florida no 37 or 46 and Coyle & Zacha were very good and Bruins spanked them by 10-4
When Bergeron & Krejci came back and Monty coached like he had never seen a hockey game that’s when they go beat
the fact that they were in on lindholm if an extension was a possibility tells me they aren't settled with the centermy mother used to tell me ‘good centers don’t go on trees’
Remember games 3 & 4 in Florida no 37 or 46 and Coyle & Zacha were very good and Bruins spanked them by 10-4
When Bergeron & Krejci came back and Monty coached like he had never seen a hockey game that’s when they go beat
YesBut you need to make sure Swayman will sign before giving up Linus, big risk otherwise to end up with neither of them come the off season
DKH if we only could have bottled up those two game and spread the pixie dust on the ice for this season, we'd be in business.my mother used to tell me ‘good centers don’t go on trees’
Remember games 3 & 4 in Florida no 37 or 46 and Coyle & Zacha were very good and Bruins spanked them by 10-4
When Bergeron & Krejci came back and Monty coached like he had never seen a hockey game that’s when they go beat
Off season if Hanifin comes here and they decide that they want to revamp the defense to add a little toughness and they feel Lohrei is ready, they can move him or Lindholm.
It’s not a must do…..just an option.
Again Lindholm might be the better option but Carlo might be the easier guy to move.
Personally, I’d be fine with just adding Hanifin to the current mix, but they do need to add some thump to the back end.
Im not sure they do.the fact that they were in on lindholm if an extension was a possibility tells me they aren't settled with the center
position just yet. he's not a #1, but more of a 1B if playing with skilled guys. issue is his asking price on july 1, if
canucks don't sign him first.