Cas
Conversational Black Hole
- Jun 23, 2020
- 5,444
- 9,812
Honestly, I don't really believe in those.intangibles, brah
Honestly, I don't really believe in those.intangibles, brah
Would you trade the Dallas pick for Will Cuylle? Would the Rangers do that?
I know we could potentially sign him to an offer sheet for 2nd round pick compensation but A) Cuylle has to actually sign the offer sheet whereas if we trade for him we control his rights no matter what and B) our 2nd next year will be a max of like 10 slots lower than the Dallas 1st in a better draft so why burn bridges with Drury/NYR over that.
I'm just not sure what a fair price would be for him. One comparable trade off the top of my head was Troy Brouwer to the Caps for the 26th overall pick in 2011. But I think Brouwer was a couple years older and had arbitration rights which Cuylle doesn't.100%. This draft blows and getting a young, big middle 6 forward seems like a no brainer. I haven’t watched much of him but I like what I’ve read! I think this is exactly the kind of move Grier should be doing with those late 1sts, especially in bad drafts.
I would easily. I doubt NYR does it personally, I don't think Cuylle is someone they want to lose unless forced.Would you trade the Dallas pick for Will Cuylle? Would the Rangers do that?
I know we could potentially sign him to an offer sheet for 2nd round pick compensation but A) Cuylle has to actually sign the offer sheet whereas if we trade for him we control his rights no matter what and B) our 2nd next year will be a max of like 10 slots lower than the Dallas 1st in a better draft so why burn bridges with Drury/NYR over that.
Being a professional hockey player is a job. Like any job, there's a lot to learn to do that job well. Mentors and good managers are a big deal in the professional world. No company in the world puts the smartest new grads into the working world and just expects them to get better because they're smart and high potential. You need to learn from people who have been doing it for a long time, even if you're already smarter than them, even if you're going to go farther than them.Frankly, I don't think Celebrini and Smith needed Granlund and Toffoli to develop. I think they're outstanding talents and would have developed just fine next to just about anyone.
I do not believe you need a bunch of "experienced veterans" to develop a successful team. I believe you need good players to do that. If ten of our twelve best forwards in 26-27 are young players, then that's what we should go with (though I don't believe is that this will be the case).
Gushchin, Cardwell, Bordeleau, and Bystedt didn't get more NHL time this year because they didn't make a case for it. I'm also not entirely convinced that was an entirely correct decision - certainly they might have more to show than has-beens or never-weres like Goodrow or Grundstrom.
That's a great idea. I guess the Rangers probably don't have incentive to move Cuylle without a legit offer sheet threat since he's arb ineligible and they could just squeeze him into taking a short term low AAV deal.I would easily. I doubt NYR does it personally, I don't think Cuylle is someone they want to lose unless forced.
The only way it could maayyybe happen IMO would be if Drury is worried about Cuylle getting an offer sheet in the 2nd round pick range and not being able to match, and Grier swoops in to offer up a 1st round pick to help Drury save face.
Honestly, the coldest thing Grier could do would be to conspire with a GM of a really good team (whose 2026 2nd will be extremely late) to threaten the Rangers with a Cuylle offer sheet, then Grier slides into Drury's DMs, offers the Dallas 1st (plus Halttunen or Lund or something even I'd do) for him. If he gets turned down still, then pivot to offering to take Kreider to help the Rangers cap.
Would you trade the Dallas pick for Will Cuylle? Would the Rangers do that?
I know we could potentially sign him to an offer sheet for 2nd round pick compensation but A) Cuylle has to actually sign the offer sheet whereas if we trade for him we control his rights no matter what and B) our 2nd next year will be a max of like 10 slots lower than the Dallas 1st in a better draft so why burn bridges with Drury/NYR over that.
Being a professional hockey player is a job. Like any job, there's a lot to learn to do that job well. Mentors and good managers are a big deal in the professional world. No company in the world puts the smartest new grads into the working world and just expects them to get better because they're smart and high potential. You need to learn from people who have been doing it for a long time, even if you're already smarter than them, even if you're going to go farther than them.
In general I don't believe in losing culture in a locker room, I don't believe the org is at risk of failure unless the owner/MGMT are dysfunctional. I do, however, having played competitive sports, having existed in the working world, and having spoken to my accomplished athlete friends, strongly believe that veteran mentorship matters, and leadership groups matter.
Thank you, I thought it was a delightfully manipulative idea.That's a great idea. I guess the Rangers probably don't have incentive to move Cuylle without a legit offer sheet threat since he's arb ineligible and they could just squeeze him into taking a short term low AAV deal.
Must not work in accounting - where intangibles are very real.Honestly, I don't really believe in those.
I think if offered $4.5M for 2 years he'd be inclined to take the offersheet. Only way he wouldn't would be if there was some Labanc stuff going on behind the scenes where the next contract was sitting signed in the drawer once the cap room opens up and it's a much larger deal than he thinks he'd otherwise get.Would you trade the Dallas pick for Will Cuylle? Would the Rangers do that?
I know we could potentially sign him to an offer sheet for 2nd round pick compensation but A) Cuylle has to actually sign the offer sheet whereas if we trade for him we control his rights no matter what and B) our 2nd next year will be a max of like 10 slots lower than the Dallas 1st in a better draft so why burn bridges with Drury/NYR over that.
With Willander trade rumors going thats an option.See, I can't lie, that's my issue.
I'm not against trading prospects.
I'm not after building an entire team with prospects (as has been mischaracterised in the initial reply to my post). Reductionism is a two way street, though, and in my humble opinion, it's the easy option for an impatient fan to make this sound like the nuclear option which wins.
To me, if you want to trade them - call out the players you want that fit (positionally, culturally etc) and then - and this is the kicker - price realistically how much you think they'd cost. In my experience, the types of players most covet are rarely available for anything less than a trade premium or an overpay in free agency because the demand outstrips the supply.
I can sit here and say "yeah, I want a top pairing RD" and that's all well and good but in reality it's far more complex. Indeed, it's as easy to screw up as it is get right.
Again, that's why I think some degree of patience is needed. Adding the 4/5 players we'd need to accelerate things is not easily done, otherwise everyone would do it.
For the right player he would, you can hear that in his comments but its well documented to not be his preference. Under special circumstances you do it. But not very likely that a player thats worth that term will want to come here, but fun to fantasize about.Nice shopping list. Would be amazing. Grier said clearly he ain't giving term. So expect nothing longer than 3 years, and expect mostly garbage. It's grier (at least at this stage), so expecting that he would commit term and $$$ to a quality players is foolhardy. Furthermore, expecting that he will add a guy like Dobson is also foolhardy as he would have to commit term and $$ to him too. And at 25, hes obviously way too old (see zetterlund).
3-5 more Lljgrens, goodrows, Dyllandreas, Grundstroms, and Desharnaises coming right up! Any actual quality will likely only come if there is pick attached (like Kreider or some other salary dump).
Pardon my cynicism. Aside from Toffoli, which was a family decision, Grier has yet to add a top 4D or top 6F, aside from draft or cap dump, to this franchise. I don't expect that trend to change, at least not this summer. I got the feeling from his postseason presser that he is still in future asset acquisition mode and not yet ready to lock in the roster.
The success/failure of the team this coming yer will rest on the shoulders of the kids. It will rest on how well dick and mukh do on D. How well Misa does if he jumps straight in. How well celly, smith, Ek, and Graf do. I dont think they are gunna get a whole lot of reinforcements.
Thank you, I thought it was a delightfully manipulative idea.![]()
That's a great idea. I guess the Rangers probably don't have incentive to move Cuylle without a legit offer sheet threat since he's arb ineligible and they could just squeeze him into taking a short term low AAV deal.
I've tried correcting that poster multiple times to no avail. Grier specifically said it wasn't his preference to do term and that his target is 4-5 years (one year more than he said last year) but he also didn't rule out longer. What he said he would NOT do is sign like 3 guys to max term deals for big money "and then two of them don't work out and you're regretting it down the line." So I still think he would be open to one big contract.For the right player he would, you can hear that in his comments but its well documented to not be his preference. Under special circumstances you do it. But not very likely that a player thats worth that term will want to come here, but fun to fantasize about.
I know people are down on him, and I know his mere existence is very triggering for some posters around here, and I'm certainly not trying to excuse his poor performance as a Shark, but we really and truly need to just erase the last couple months from our heads and let Ostapchuk come in with a fresh slate in camp next September.
I'm sure the team will set it up in a way that he will have an opportunity to make the big club next season. We will have Goodrow, Grundstrom, Dellandrea, Ostapchuk, Giles, Bystedt, and Cardwell as 4th line options for next season before any offseason movement. Nobody really stands out in that group at this point. If he heals up, has a solid offseason, and finds another level to his game, he can have a turnaround similar to Zetterlund's after he first came here. He just needs to be quicker in everything he does and he can probably carve something out for himself here.