Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

Forlan

Registered User
Nov 30, 2024
16
11
Many people say that Smith will definitely improve and be ready in 1-2 years, but this is just blind faith. Undoubtedly, he sees his partners well and is able to give a good pass. That's where his strengths end. I used to hope that he could become a second Logan Cooley for us, but that's not possible. Definitely not enough maneuverability and speed.
 

CHALUPA

Registered User
Oct 9, 2008
1,074
297
Many people say that Smith will definitely improve and be ready in 1-2 years, but this is just blind faith. Undoubtedly, he sees his partners well and is able to give a good pass. That's where his strengths end. I used to hope that he could become a second Logan Cooley for us, but that's not possible. Definitely not enough maneuverability and speed.

Too young to know this. He’s at the expected spot of his development curve, I don’t see a reason to be pessimistic at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: weastern bias

Skeksis25

Registered User
Feb 17, 2023
334
818
North Brunswick, NJ
Smith may never amount to much, but it's wild to me that some people are ready to write him off as a 19 year old who has played 28 games so far. Macklin looking as good as he has had skewed perspective a bit I feel. What Mack is doing is not normal. What Smith is doing is a lot more in line of what you would expect.

Heck, he is essentially scoring at the same rate as Adam Fantili is right now who has the benefit of being on a better team and a year of NHL experience under his belt. Leo Carlsson isn't much further ahead either. And those guys were the big non Bedard prizes.

Again, Smith may very well end up being a bust, but can we at least let him get a year or two to show how shitty he is? He's clearly improved since his first handful of games. There is no way he can get any better anymore?
 

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,562
2,011
Smith may never amount to much, but it's wild to me that some people are ready to write him off as a 19 year old who has played 28 games so far. Macklin looking as good as he has had skewed perspective a bit I feel. What Mack is doing is not normal. What Smith is doing is a lot more in line of what you would expect.

Heck, he is essentially scoring at the same rate as Adam Fantili is right now who has the benefit of being on a better team and a year of NHL experience under his belt. Leo Carlsson isn't much further ahead either. And those guys were the big non Bedard prizes.

Again, Smith may very well end up being a bust, but can we at least let him get a year or two to show how shitty he is? He's clearly improved since his first handful of games. There is no way he can get any better anymore?
This point can’t be emphasized enough. Celebrini is on pace for one of the most impressive rookie seasons since Crosby. What Celebrini is doing to absolutely not normal and skews everyones perception of Smith.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,692
25,555
Bay Area
It’s getting to the point of embarrassment reading the hot takes on Smith after 28 games. Really makes it feel like a good portion of the posters with these takes have never watched or followed a hockey team before.
Comes back to my point which is that Sharks fans have literally never watched a teenager play for the Sharks. No clue what development is. That's how you end up with all these braindead takes.
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
15,855
12,894
San Jose
Comes back to my point which is that Sharks fans have literally never watched a teenager play for the Sharks. No clue what development is. That's how you end up with all these braindead takes.
The last teenager they probably watched play for the Sharks scored 4 goals in his 3rd NHL game, so you can understand their impatience. I mean, why hasn't Smith or Celebrini done that yet? What is wrong with them?
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,692
25,555
Bay Area
The last teenager they probably watched play for the Sharks scored 4 goals in his 3rd NHL game, so you can understand their impatience. I mean, why hasn't Smith or Celebrini done that yet? What is wrong with them?
Personally, I wouldn't consider Hertl to have been a traditional "teenaged NHLer". He had two years of pro-hockey in the Czech Republic already and he turned 20 in November. He was also 6'3" and playing on the wing of prime Joe Thornton. People around here also called him a bust during his sophomore year though, so maybe it is relevant...
 

MackAttack71

Registered User
May 10, 2024
131
245
Germany
tumblr_lkqm0enAZt1qh59n0o1_500.gif
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
15,855
12,894
San Jose
Personally, I wouldn't consider Hertl to have been a traditional "teenaged NHLer". He had two years of pro-hockey in the Czech Republic already and he turned 20 in November. He was also 6'3" and playing on the wing of prime Joe Thornton. People around here also called him a bust during his sophomore year though, so maybe it is relevant...
Was going for the cheap laugh because of all the reasons you listed.
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,973
6,539
Lots of "rumors" and tradebaiting towards Granlund -> Dallas, full freight. I'm mixed. BUT, i wonder if Ceci and Granlud could be targets of theirs, sweetening our pot
I've heard nothing; just some speculation from various writers.

Regarding Goodrow:

1) Trade made sense at the time. He probably had a year too much on his contract, but it was what it was.
2) The people who were more skeptical about his ability to play hockey appear to have had the right measure. Outside of the PK, he doesn't look NHL-quality.
3) Goodrow is probably a great person in the room, and that's valuable, especially to a rebuilding team. It isn't a complete coincidence that Grier targeted him, or that the Rangers have collapsed since the trade.

Regarding Smith:

There are...hyperbolic takes about a 19-year-old rookie. It doesn't help that he has to play alongside an 18-year-old phenom. But, even with less experience, he has similar numbers to his draft compatriots from 2023. It's a good sign, and it points to Smith hitting his stride when the Sharks's window opens.

At the same time, there was some debate about Smith's ceiling and his role in the organization. It's not 100% yet, but it's clearer now than before that Smith isn't going to be a generational-level talent. As fitting the joke, he's at best going to be the #2 guy behind Celebrini (that's nearly 100% certainty). I'm not sure what the odds are on him being a franchise player vs. "just" a #1C, but it has to be skewing more toward the latter.
 

CupfortheSharks

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 31, 2008
2,905
1,799
San Jose
Comes back to my point which is that Sharks fans have literally never watched a teenager play for the Sharks. No clue what development is. That's how you end up with all these braindead takes.
We did have this Patrick guy a while back. He spent a whole lot of time on a traditional checking line his rookie year because Darryl Sutter wouldn’t have it any other way. Turns out he became a pretty good two way player.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sincityshark

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
25,852
7,510
ontario
We did have this Patrick guy a while back. He spent a whole lot of time on a traditional checking line his rookie year because Darryl Sutter wouldn’t have it any other way. Turns out he became a pretty good two way player.
He also had way more talent on his line then smith is getting.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,692
25,555
Bay Area
We did have this Patrick guy a while back. He spent a whole lot of time on a traditional checking line his rookie year because Darryl Sutter wouldn’t have it any other way. Turns out he became a pretty good two way player.
I was five years old when that happened! I know some people on this forum absolutely love to brag about how ancient they are, but I don't think most of us have a clear recollection of Patrick Marleau as a rookie. :laugh:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad