Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

timorous me

Gristled Veteran
Apr 14, 2010
2,434
4,075
Wow, that's.... cheap. How on earth did we not get in on that?
I assume they see Borgen as a competent 2nd pairing RD, only 28 as of tomorrow, and they liked him better than anyone we have available in that role.

There's no point in the Rangers not trying to rebound this season (which is why I've banged the "Fire Laviolette" drum for them the past month or so) with the way the roster is constructed. But one glaring hole has been at RD, especially after shipping Trouba out (though of course the intent was not just to get rid of him, but to get better in that role).

I imagine a big part of this is also hoping Miller can find chemistry with Borgen and that can become a long-term strong second pairing. There are still a lot of issues to fix or guys to get back on track, but this could do something for them.
 

sharski

Registered User
Jun 4, 2012
5,863
5,136
It genuinely sucks that Couture can’t be a part of this new up and coming Sharks team. A healthy Couture would be SUCH an asset right now and it’s such a bummer that he had to be stuck playing on some of our worst teams and likely won’t get to be part of the future. Always thought he had it in him to be a great vet 3C or transition to wing and have a Pavelski-like career…
In my fan fic, Celebrini shocks the world and brings the team right up to the edge of but not quite over the hump of winning the cup... And then out of nowhere Couture shows up like Gandalf and the Rohirrim at Helm's Deep and is the x factor OP 3rd line center that pushes them over the edge and we see Couture pass the cup over to Mack in an on-the-nose symbolic gesture
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,612
25,339
Bay Area
I assume they see Borgen as a competent 2nd pairing RD, only 28 as of tomorrow, and they liked him better than anyone we have available in that role.

There's no point in the Rangers not trying to rebound this season (which is why I've banged the "Fire Laviolette" drum for them the past month or so) with the way the roster is constructed. But one glaring hole has been at RD, especially after shipping Trouba out (though of course the intent was not just to get rid of him, but to get better in that role).

I imagine a big part of this is also hoping Miller can find chemistry with Borgen and that can become a long-term strong second pairing. There are still a lot of issues to fix or guys to get back on track, but this could do something for them.
I was somewhat interested in Borgen before this season but he's been really bad this season. Ceci might actually be better.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan

timorous me

Gristled Veteran
Apr 14, 2010
2,434
4,075
I was somewhat interested in Borgen before this season but he's been really bad this season. Ceci might actually be better.
Yeah, that's the main problem with Borgen. Maybe the Rangers are seeing something promising under the hood? (Or, more likely, they're just getting really desperate.)
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,612
25,339
Bay Area
Yeah, that's the main problem with Borgen. Maybe the Rangers are seeing something promising under the hood? (Or, more likely, they're just getting really desperate.)
They employ Ryan Lindgren on purpose. I'm guessing they just like him because big and tuff. It is funny that they traded Trouba only to immediately acquire Trouba-lite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timorous me

Anomie2029

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
4,078
4,519
Melbourne, Australia
Maybe Grier doesn't like something about Kakko (which sucks because Grier took Goodrow ffs).
I must say I was surprised with how vocal Kakko was about his scratching - I understand his frustration, but you rarely hear it aired out like that.

May not be the kind of player Grier wants in the room.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad