But it wasn’t a home run swing. Cowen was actually a safe pick.… if you’re looking for bottom 6 players.Honestly, I have no qualms with Tre giving Wes Clarke a homerun swing in Tre's first year here.
If the Kampf news hadn't ruined my day, I would have been feeling pretty good about Tre right now.
Disagree, if he continues his upward trajectory that started mid way through last season, you could have a very hard to find combination of skills and traits here. Anytime you draft a kid who had a short but strong rise just before the draft, I think it's a bit of a homerun swing.But it wasn’t a home run swing. Cowen was actually a safe pick.… if you’re looking for bottom 6 players.
Gulyayev or Nadeau would’ve been home run swings.
So just random, unverified lists? I had him at 21/22, so in my eyes, quite the steal.
What does this even mean lol Dubas would have loved this kidPeople who wanted Dubas gone, I think the reality is going to set in soon for some that maybe it wasn’t the best idea to get what you wished for.
Definitely some survivorship bias, but it seems like betting on a London area hardworking two-way type that the community gets bullish on and is good enough to be a top 60 pick is a pretty good idea. I remember O'Rielly and Horvat being absolute favourites. Any one that I'm forgetting, and any misses you can think of?This kid has top line potential. Maybe not in a Marner/Matthews way, but in a way that will make that line-perform better as a 3rd wheel.
I want one player. Leafs can only pick one player at #28 who is your shot?Nadeau and Gulyayev both have top line skill sets who were still on the board. Heidt was there as well.
The leafs picked a guy who maxes out as a 50 point player who they could’ve drafted 15 slots later over guys with 80 point potential.
Not a BPA strategy.
Similar to what Arizona did. Arizona reached for guys with size and the leafs reached for a guy with hockey IQ. Montreal constantly reaches for players based on position.
None of these biased strategies are effective IMO. You need a balanced approach.
I think he means not only does Shanahan make the calls for Treliving, apparently Wes Clark makes his decisions too.What does this even mean lol Dubas would have loved this kid
You also have a small sample size. Many draft busts have been drafted too high because of one great game, playoff series or tournament.Disagree, if he continues his upward trajectory that started mid way through last season, you could have a very hard to find combination of skills and traits here. Anytime you draft a kid who had a short but strong rise just before the draft, I think it's a bit of a homerun swing.
What does this even mean lol Dubas would have loved this kid
Definitely some survivorship bias, but it seems like betting on a London area hardworking two-way type that the community gets bullish on and is good enough to be a top 60 pick is a pretty good idea. I remember O'Rielly and Horvat being absolute favourites. Any one that I'm forgetting, and any misses you can think of?
So is that what we are going to do for the next 3 years? Everything we don't like is going to be followed by "Dubas wouldn't have done that".Combination of things from the day. Considering Treliving didn’t have any input on the draft this likely was still a Dubas pick. But the trade down was the Dubas special, and the Kampf deal isn’t likely something he does.
Glad to see some center depth coming back into the organization with Minten and now Cowan.
No question, this is a reach. In 2-4 years, we will find out if the reach was worth it, and if we get a NHL player out of this or not. I guess we cheer for the kid, and hope for the best from him, he’s one of our guys now.
One more box. Late birthday, kid is young.I haven’t followed this draft closely, so I’m not going to pretend I know what I’m talking about.
I’m also not one to overreact based on publicly available rankings.
Cowan seems to check all the boxes for me though, late riser playoff performing hard working good skating two-way forward with offensive tools, good attitude, good work ethic and farm strength. If he was 1-2” taller, or didn’t start slow seems like he’d have been a mid-late 1st.
Seems like a good gamble to me, albeit would’ve been nice to add a pick by trading back. Although it seems like Tre tried.
People who wanted Dubas gone, I think the reality is going to set in soon for some that maybe it wasn’t the best idea to get what you wished for.
What I do know is he was one of the 20 guys the Leafs hosted for an extra private skate after the combine. Molendyk who went to Nashville and triggered Tre to work the phones hard was also there. Seems like that was their BPA.
I want one player. Leafs can only pick one player at #28 who is your shot?
I think you are dramatically underselling him, while at the same time overselling the upside for these other players. If guys like Michael Bunting can hit 63 with no PP1 time, or Hyman hitting 83 this year. You are speaking in certainties which anyone who has any experience watching prospects would know aren't realistic. Kids constantly outperform their perceived ceilings and dramatically under achieve their floors, that people on this site constantly state with certainty. Look at someone like Brad Marchand.
I'm not saying that Cowan is going to take the NHL with storm, but you are likely talking with certainty about players you don't know much about. London fans loved the kid, scouts raved about his work ethic and desire to get better, etc.
In the late 20's you are rarely talking about getting guys with 80 point potential, especially with a high probability of doing it.
Tree was seen on the phone before the pick. It is quite possible it wasn't him soliciting the trade down but rather other teams wanting to trade up. It was probably the leafs that declined the trade down. This was the player they wanted in my opinion.
If I had to take a wild guess right now, I could see Minten as a very good top 6 complimentary winger one day. Physical, likes to shoot, would be a great wingman for our core group.Maybe one of them could be an NHL center but I suspect both have games that project them to be NHL wingers.
So is that what we are going to do for the next 3 years? Everything we don't like is going to be followed by "Dubas wouldn't have done that".
Exgirlfriend syndrome is real in some of y'all.
Not a fan of the pick, eh?Bunting and Hyman benefitted tremendously from linemates. On an average team they don’t score at that pace.
Marchand is an elite skater.
Every CHL team has a favourite player the fans love. That doesn’t mean they’re all first round picks.
Konecny was loved off the top of my head. Lawson Crouse too. Not stars but effective players. I'm sure there are tons of misses along the way. But, those are all farm kids or from farming areas.Definitely some survivorship bias, but it seems like betting on a London area hardworking two-way type that the community gets bullish on and is good enough to be a top 60 pick is a pretty good idea. I remember O'Rielly and Horvat being absolute favourites. Any one that I'm forgetting, and any misses you can think of?
Okay, but who is this one star we passed on? One name. I don't want a shotgun approach. We only pick one player. Call your shot if you are so confident we passed on a potential 80 point player who has your definition of top-line ability.Bunting and Hyman benefitted tremendously from linemates. On an average team they don’t score at that pace.
Marchand is an elite skater.
Every CHL team has a favourite player the fans love. That doesn’t mean they’re all first round picks.