Sabresbyswords104
Registered User
- Dec 7, 2019
- 649
- 199
Just take slafko …. He Will be Sabres next Thomas vanek or av Gaborik, kopitar etc…..
Slafkovský Cozens Peterka
Krebs Thompson Quinn
Skinner/Olofsson Mitts Tuch
I'm confused by the comparisons as he doesn't stylistically play like any of themJust take slafko …. He Will be Sabres next Thomas vanek or av Gaborik, kopitar etc…..
Slafkovský Cozens Peterka
Krebs Thompson Quinn
Skinner/Olofsson Mitts Tuch
You're really starting to sell me on GauthierI'm confused by the comparisons as he doesn't stylistically play like any of them
He's going to be a big riser, I just hope Ottawa doesn't draft him as he fits their profileYou're really starting to sell me on Gauthier
He looks awesome tonight against Team USA...He and Nemec both in actionokay, just figure out how to get Slafkovsky. goddam
He's been the 7th D the last two gamesDoes Nemec get no ice time?
Just take slafko …. He Will be Sabres next Thomas vanek or av Gaborik, kopitar etc…..
Slafkovský Cozens Peterka
Krebs Thompson Quinn
Skinner/Olofsson Mitts Tuch
See - this is why I'd prioritise RHD if we have any of these guys grouped closely in terms of rankings.
There's already 10 guys pencilled in for 'top 9' roles in the short/medium term (I'm including Asplund plus the 9 above). The majority of these guys are young.
That's also not accounting for a bunch of other guys recently drafted such as Rosen also making the jump.
On RHD there is next to nothing.
I'm not against using the pick on another position & of course I know 'you shouldnt draft for need' - but it had better be someone realistically capable of supplanting one of the guys we currently have.
I want the best RHD possible out of this draft. I also think 2 of the first 4 picks should be RHD.
It's such a blatant organisational need. Short, medium & long term.
No good GM goes into a draft with need at the forefront of draft needs, unless it’s an early stage rebuild and they are looking for centers. Otherwise, you draft off your board. That’s how you get Jack Quinn.
Sabres are currently drafting 7. Assume that draft order holds, and no lottery movement pushes the Sabres down.
Going off tankathon’s win percentage projection, and Bob McKenzie’s list from last month, here’s how the draft could go (I made some adjustment for injuries to Kemell and Jiricek, and Slafkovsky’s current play.
1. Montreal: Wright
2. Arizona: Cooley
3. Seattle: Slafkovsky
4. Philly: Savoie
5. NJ: Kemell
6. Ottawa: Miroshnechenko
7. Buffalo:
Next players on the board:
Yurov
Jiricek
Nemec
Geekie
Lambert
It’d be really hard for me to take Jiricek or Nemec over a big, mobile center line Geekie or an explosive center like Lambert. Especially with a slew of RHD projected to be available when the Sabres pick twice at the end of the round.
If those five are available, I rank them on my board:
Lambert
Geekie
Nemec
Yurov
Jiricek
Geekie's play is far too inconsistent to take over Nemec or Jiricek, or even Yurov.No good GM goes into a draft with need at the forefront of draft needs, unless it’s an early stage rebuild and they are looking for centers. Otherwise, you draft off your board. That’s how you get Jack Quinn.
Sabres are currently drafting 7. Assume that draft order holds, and no lottery movement pushes the Sabres down.
Going off tankathon’s win percentage projection, and Bob McKenzie’s list from last month, here’s how the draft could go (I made some adjustment for injuries to Kemell and Jiricek, and Slafkovsky’s current play.
1. Montreal: Wright
2. Arizona: Cooley
3. Seattle: Slafkovsky
4. Philly: Savoie
5. NJ: Kemell
6. Ottawa: Miroshnechenko
7. Buffalo:
Next players on the board:
Yurov
Jiricek
Nemec
Geekie
Lambert
It’d be really hard for me to take Jiricek or Nemec over a big, mobile center line Geekie or an explosive center like Lambert. Especially with a slew of RHD projected to be available when the Sabres pick twice at the end of the round.
If those five are available, I rank them on my board:
Lambert
Geekie
Nemec
Yurov
Jiricek
Geekie's play is far too inconsistent to take over Nemec or Jiricek, or even Yurov.
See - this is why I'd prioritise RHD if we have any of these guys grouped closely in terms of rankings.
There's already 10 guys pencilled in for 'top 9' roles in the short/medium term (I'm including Asplund plus the 9 above). The majority of these guys are young.
That's also not accounting for a bunch of other guys recently drafted such as Rosen also making the jump.
On RHD there is next to nothing.
I'm not against using the pick on another position & of course I know 'you shouldnt draft for need' - but it had better be someone realistically capable of supplanting one of the guys we currently have.
I want the best RHD possible out of this draft. I also think 2 of the first 4 picks should be RHD.
It's such a blatant organisational need. Short, medium & long term.
If that's how it goes I'd happily take either Nemec or Jiricek. Probably Nemec given we already have Dahlin/Power.
Your bias towards centres is well known. We don't need to talk about it again...
It’s a bias nearly every NHL front office has.
Nemec or Jiricek would be good if we fall in the draft. Would be happy if we rise and take a C like Savoie. Would be really Nice as we trade Eichel. Would much rather have this forward lineup instead of the D above.
Skinner Thompson Tuch
Krebs Cozens Olofsson
Peterka Savoie Quinn
Asplund Girgensons Okposo