Fight4yourRight
“Chuck’s my guy”
- Dec 18, 2017
- 3,688
- 7,825
Risto may well stink up the joint when he arrives, who really knows, but at the very least Sanheim will finally have someone to defend him from big bad Gerbe.
Because his first name isn’t Travis.
My opinion matters now? Decent chance you'll just take offense to it anyway.Great input.
He appears to have solid underlying stats. What makes him "not good"
That EV WAR is glaring. Love how the Ghost + 13th overall pick + Hagg + 2 2nds + 7th got us that
Its impossible to know what an agent and the GM are talking about regarding contracts, so we shouldnt jump to conclusions.
We do know, definitively, though, that Chris Stewart wasnt brought in and given a contract to be a regular, despite being used that way out of the gate. We can absolutely draw that conclusion.
Honestly, I don't get how you play both sides of the coin whenever the feeling suits. What a life to live.
Yes…and me too!Sign me up for Hanifin for Sanheim
What are some bad players with good underlying stats? Does that never happen? Are there any good players with bad underlying stats? Does that happen or are these stats the end-all be-all? Honestly I don't know. Seems like there's a lot of people on here who fully understand them and are committed to believing they are the vast majority of valid player evaluation.
What are some bad players with good underlying stats? Does that never happen? Are there any good players with bad underlying stats? Does that happen or are these stats the end-all be-all? Honestly I don't know. Seems like there's a lot of people on here who fully understand them and are committed to believing they are the vast majority of valid player evaluation.
What are some bad players with good underlying stats? Does that never happen? Are there any good players with bad underlying stats? Does that happen or are these stats the end-all be-all? Honestly I don't know. Seems like there's a lot of people on here who fully understand them and are committed to believing they are the vast majority of valid player evaluation.
You don't have to look far.
Robert hagg had a 14 game stretch where he was playing at top pair level and had potentially "turned the corner" last year. Statistically, anyway. He was still playing at a replacement level, but he was being carried by favorable usage and good linemates, Driving his metrics through the roof while still continuing to be a drag on the team.
Statistically, Ghost was our best defensive defenseman last year, but everyone thinks he's as bad at D as Hagg actually is and is happy he's gone.
Anyone have any Corsi stats on hand? That’s my go-to.
My impression of advanced statistics in hockey, is they generally miss accurately accounting for how good, or bad the player's team is. And yes - we have all seen guys like VdV have good Corsi numbers and not just for individual games.
They’re almost all graded relative to the team or teammates to not miss out on that at all.
VDV’s best relCF% season was almost -4%. So, no that’s not true. And we have better stats to account for quality. He sucked just as much. Sounds to me like your impression could use some actual stats.
You don't have to look far.
Robert hagg had a 14 game stretch where he was playing at top pair level and had potentially "turned the corner" last year. Statistically, anyway. He was still playing at a replacement level, but he was being carried by favorable usage and good linemates, Driving his metrics through the roof while still continuing to be a drag on the team.
Statistically, Ghost was our best defensive defenseman last year, but everyone thinks he's as bad at D as Hagg actually is and is happy he's gone.
It's funny how the "I dont believe in advanced stats" crowd always tend to be...not so advanced?
Hopefully the return will be nice then.