Call my crazy (or a nerd), but I don't get it. You have two depth players vying for a mostly irrelevant 4th line center role. So you keep the guy who's more expensive, crappier on the PK, and less effective defensively over the last three seasons? Gotta feel like Faksa could have brought back a higher pick too.
I liked Dickinson better than faksa aswell . I don’t know if Vancouver only wanted Dickinson or not but I’d have to imagine faksa would have sufficed to them . I would have rather traded faksa but whatever , not a huge difference I guess .
Would it be possible for a team to protect a player for another team ? Say we traded mascherin to Detroit for a 3rd. They protect him . After the expansion draft , we trade them the 3rd plus another 3rd or 4th and receive mascherin back .
Any Player who is transferred (via Waivers or Trade) from one NHL Club’s Reserve List to another NHL Club’s Reserve List from February 1, 2021 through the date of the Expansion Draft (both dates inclusive) may not be reacquired via Trade by his prior NHL Club during the period following the Expansion Draft through January 31, 2022 (both dates inclusive). For the purpose of this provision, the “date of the Expansion Draft” shall be tentatively set as July 21, 2021, but remains subject to change as may be agreed upon between the parties.
DammitI think I remember reading about a rule that would prevent against this loophole. Don't remember the exact specifics, but I don't think you'd be able to trade him back until February or something.
Edit: found it
He’s a wild card, as most prospects are. He’s either gonna be a 20 goal scorer or a top line AHLer with no real in between. Personally I’d rather Seattle takes Dickinson over him, just because with Dicky you know you’re just losing a quality 9-11 hole F, but the most you’re losing with Mascherin is a lottery ticket. At least with Dickinson you definitely free up a couple million in cap.
I feel like Benn shouldve done the same thing as bishop and waived the nmc. Highly doubt they would’ve taken him .
Even to protect mascherin though . If there’s no chance Seattle takes Benn than why not ? And if they do , there goes our worst contract .Still would've protected him over Dickinson even if he decided he would waive . Not to mention i don't think Dickinson could've been re-signed even if we kept him. The #4 defenseman and Kivis new contract will eat basically all the remaining capspace.
It will be tight , and really depends on what happens with bishop / khudobin but they should be able to resign klingberg , Jones , Robertson and gurianov and oettenger next year if lindell is gone and oleksiak signed to 4.5 or lower .My only issues is how much Jones wants to resign for and then what happens with Klingberg