- May 9, 2014
- 5,822
- 8,237
Perhaps the contract piece came over as critical, that not how intended it. You’re correct it’s a development situation and he has plenty of time. I was more trying to emphasize the development of Kiransov because the way Yanetti was talking I think they will want him over for his D+3 season. I worded it badly.I can appreciate all that as a "plus" for Kirsanov while "not a minus" for Kim. Hard to hold league against a guy, especially because different franchises treat youth differently.
But re the boldfaced I really have a hard time holding that against Europeans who are for the most part developing where we want, there are only so many spaces on the Ontario blueline! I'm not sure offhand what his contract with his team was, but that's a factor--ie even Kirsanov could be 'ready' next year but if his contract isn't up he isn't going anywhere. Similarly, Simontaival has a three year deal with KalPa. Can't do much about that
Again, not holding Liiga against him, it’s a great league that has pumped out NHL players. My point is the number of KHL games, and Kiransovs usage compared to Nousaianens in their draft years. Nousaianens usage and development is fairly typical and that is perfectly fine. Kirsanov’s is far better than you’d expect of most 18 year olds in the KHL…. Maybe it’s because he’s really 38! In the KHL 18 year olds don’t normally get a regular shift, he did on the 2nd pair.
Sorry for the poor wording, I’m knackered but have a bought of insomnia. It’s now 03:37….