KINGS17
Smartest in the Room
- Apr 6, 2006
- 32,582
- 11,766
If the process is good and executed correctly, the results will come. I don't see McLellan's process working over a 7-game series against a tough opponent.I think that’s the issue with the people on this board. They see a W and think that the Kings did something right and cannot change what they did.. however that’s not the case. It’s obvious who here has played sports and who here hasn’t, winning is the point but is the method sustainable? I don’t think so. Kopitar was great yes, but who here hasn’t seen Anze work out this year ? He’s shown wear for sure. I think wearing him out is essentially neutralizing him so the unsustainable method pretty much shows why it’s a problem. The Kings won but playing Kopitar to death isn’t the way you win the whole picture.
And honestly it’s just bad coaching. It suggests not only does the coach not trust the other players but also that the coach is unwilling to adapt mid game. And Anyone who’s played teams back to back, or even done a one on one back to back for a set or series will know that the opposition picks up on your habits and tendencies. They adapt to it. Then you have to start tweaking your game plan. That’s how it works, and that’s one reason why Todd fails in post season. Unwilling to adapt. Kings are winning but it’s not in the correct way. It seems to me that it’s based on fear and a lack of trust in the line up. So yes. The way you win absolutely matters.
I don’t think people realize how important your approach is. It’s as important as the result.
The Kings may indeed win this round against Edmonton, but it will be another wasted opportunity if he plays Kopitar 25 minutes a night to do it.
...and I really don't think Kopitar will play mistake-free hockey if he is getting 23 - 25 minutes a game.