What's wrong with Arda???A Erika, Bryce
B Cangi, Dano
F Arda Ocal, wherever he is.
What's wrong with Arda???A Erika, Bryce
B Cangi, Dano
F Arda Ocal, wherever he is.
It doesn't work that way. Players have roles, responsibilities, expectations, salaries and ice time. Foe example I would give A to Bastian if he did score 16 goals or more. But Zacha and Tatar would never take B for 16 goals. Only if they did play 35 games.You can’t have Johnsson and McLeod (or Vesey really) rated higher than Tatar and Zacha. The later two were much better. Also no way Severson should have a C. That is suggesting he had a bad season. Which he did not. Was one of the best of his career. B at least. Boqvist should get a B as well in my opinion.
Severson was very good defensively though. That’s just not true. He has the odd breakdown or mistake but it is far outweighed by strong defensive play on a shift-by-shift basis.It doesn't work that way. Players have roles, responsibilities, expectations, salaries and ice time. Foe example I would give A to Bastian if he did score 16 goals or more. But Zacha and Tatar would never take B for 16 goals. Only if they did play 35 games.
Severson was good offensively, but he wasn't defensively. He is defenseman. And I have standards.
Johnsson was much better as 200foot player than Tatar. And Zacha lost all of his little trust. After last season Johnsson was OK. Zacha and Tatar were not. They did start as top 6 players. Johnsson was bottom player, find some trust, lost it, but didn't hurt overall game much. Zacha and Tatar lost a lot of moments.
Boqvist was good in the second half of the season, but his defensive game wasn't really good. His offensive production overall isn't great. He is older than Kuoakkanen was year ago, his defensive game isn't better, his production isn't better. And after this season we can't say that he deserve spot and Fitz doesn't need to sign good two way center. Its debatable.
I'm not a fan of severson defensive play. He is very good on boards and behind the net, but he isn't good on the slot, he makes mistakes against breakaways, he lost his man or his zone against the circle.Severson was very good defensively though. That’s just not true. He has the odd breakdown or mistake but it is far outweighed by strong defensive play on a shift-by-shift basis.
Boqvist was also more than fine defensively and IMO certainly looks like he should be on the roster to start next season.
I am fine with the rest of it and can see where you’re coming from.
The Severson being bad defensively suggestions are just dumb at this point though and backed only by the odd noticeable mistake every now and then. Severson is our second best defensmen defensively (behind Siegenthaler) and he has played the most. and he had a great year offensively on top off that. And he’s good in transition.
Fair enough I kind of viewed C as bad. Maybe just a misunderstanding.I'm not a fan of severson defensive play. He is very good on boards and behind the net, but he isn't good on the slot, he makes mistakes against breakaways, he lost his man or his zone against the circle.
But I understand that is a question of role and concentration. May be if he will play less time, he will play better.
Severson is really hard question for me now. Hope he will make "home discount".
Overall I like Boqvist and want to watch him more. I would prefer to NOT trade him, only if we can take starting goalie in hockey trade.
You should know C isn't a bad rank in my vision.
Fair enough I kind of viewed C as bad. Maybe just a misunderstanding.
Severson plays a lot of minutes and is solid defensively though. He’s not great or perfect but he’s good in most areas defensively.
Well last time I checked, Jesper doesn't play the position of GOALTENDER (so he can't prevent these "one-sided losses") but you do you, I guess.I really did try to see it and will admit he did make strides - going to the crease at times (which he rarely did in the past).
His numbers for such a bad team increase his value but way too many times they seemed to come on the one or two goals in a one sided loss.
While it's tough for me to overlook the image of him gliding back to the zone leaving a player with far inferior speed and skill to create scoring chances.
Too many losses to continue to excuse.
gillies better than anybody else, is kind of hard to believe. the difference must be expectation.The cruelest, most relevant and most fair opinion that you can read here.
A Nico, Bratt, Hughes, Siegenthaler
B Mercer, Yegor, Bastian
C Severson, Boqvist, Daws, Nas
C- Hamilton, Subban, Johnsson, Mcleod, Vesey, Ruff
D Tatar, Zacha, Kuokkanen
D- Geertsen, Blackwood, Fitz
F Gillies
F- Smith and Recchi
I`m ok with Fitz, but I don`t like the way how he act with goalie situation.
Incomplete
Kevin Bahl (like)
Fabian Zetterlund (big like)
Alexander Holtz (ok. too early)
Jonathan Berniers (wtf again!)
Nikita Okhotiuk (big like)
Miles Wood (we missed this guy)
Andrew Hammond (meh)
Akira Schmid (not ok, but too early)
Nolan Foote (like)
I don't agree with the measure (B=met expectation). The grades should be for actual performance and not for performance above or below expectation.Player Grades:
Based on expectations and overall. So an expected 4th liner who played like a good 3rd liner isn’t gonna get an A but will have a better rating than an expected 2nd liner who played like a good 3rd liner.
B= Met expectations and was pretty good.
*=small sample
A: Bratt
A-: Hughes, Siegenthaler
B+: Severson, Hischier, Sharangovich, Mercer, *Zetterlund, *Bahl, *Okhotiuk
B: Boqvist, Daws, *Foote
B-: Bastian, Bernier, *Walsh (1 game)
C+: *Wood, Subban, Graves
C: Tatar, Zacha, Hamilton, Vesey, Hammond, *Holtz, White
C-: Johnsson, *Schmid, Mcleod, *Greer
D+: Blackwood, Kuokkonen (stronger finish)
D: Geersten
D-: Smith
F: Gilles
Um you don’t agree with my measure? That’s kind of weird. It’s the measure I chose to use. And I wasn’t just going off of expectations if you chose to read. It was a combination of how well they performed overall but also in comparison with what I expected of them. I think that’s more than reasonable to do and most people seem to be doing it like that.I don't agree with the measure (B=met expectation). The grades should be for actual performance and not for performance above or below expectation.
And I don't think you followed your own measures in all cases. Did you expect Bernier to miss most of the season? I agree withe the grade for Gillies performances wise but really question your expectations.
Lol, I was going to say, if you don’t like it, come up with your own grading system.Um you don’t agree with my measure? That’s kind of weird. It’s the measure I chose to use. And I wasn’t just going off of expectations if you chose to read. It was a combination of how well they performed overall but also in comparison with what I expected of them. I think that’s more than reasonable to do and most people seem to be doing it like that.
And what?! I absolutely did on Bernier. I’m not judging Bernier’s play off of him missing games due to injury. I don’t think you understand the point of this. I’m grading how he was when he played. What does him getting injured for a long time have to do with that?
From my end keep out the expectation. Same level performances resulting in lower grades because of higher expectation doesn't sound fair. Siegenthaler in general gets graded too good. His offensive contribution isn't good enough to be rated an A. B is fine. You can have him as the Devils best D this season. But Severson can't be a full grade lower. Both looked best as a pair and they complemented each other well.Lol, I was going to say, if you don’t like it, come up with your own grading system.
This is just weird all around man. Most of these gradings people have done are based on expectations. We are grading how that player did this season. How good of a season they had. What we can expect from them is a huge part of how we can say they did this season. Siegenthaler gets graded good because he significantly surpassed people’s expectations and by his standard had a great season. He gets an A because he had a great season. Severson was actually better than him overall but we expected Severson to be better.From my end keep out the expectation. Same level performances resulting in lower grades because of higher expectation doesn't sound fair. Siegenthaler in general gets graded too good. His offensive contribution isn't good enough to be rated an A. B is fine. You can have him as the Devils best D this season. But Severson can't be a full grade lower. Both looked best as a pair and they complemented each other well.
I am still torn between grading within the Devils only or make it comparable for the league. Devils only allows for better distinction within the team. While you can justify an A for Bratt or Hischier in the context of the Devils. They more belong into the B category, if you grade in the context of the whole league.
Everything.What's wrong with Arda???
In the context of the whole league??From my end keep out the expectation. Same level performances resulting in lower grades because of higher expectation doesn't sound fair. Siegenthaler in general gets graded too good. His offensive contribution isn't good enough to be rated an A. B is fine. You can have him as the Devils best D this season. But Severson can't be a full grade lower. Both looked best as a pair and they complemented each other well.
I am still torn between grading within the Devils only or make it comparable for the league. Devils only allows for better distinction within the team. While you can justify an A for Bratt or Hischier in the context of the Devils. They more belong into the B category, if you grade in the context of the whole league.
Thailand (and/or Switzerland)A+++
Siegenthaler, a big calculated, steady, physical, and undervalued steal! Where can we find more of them?
Meh I kinda like him. *Shrug*Everything.
But to answer seriously, super annoying grating personality, low signal talker who fills up space, strong car salesman energy and there was absolutely no point to having him on a broadcast.