Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 67,154
- 52,879
Connor Brown ? If we can get a 2nd + for him ... go for itI would trade Brown and a 2nd for some pucks and water bottles but that would be a waste of a 2nd rounder.
Connor Brown ? If we can get a 2nd + for him ... go for itI would trade Brown and a 2nd for some pucks and water bottles but that would be a waste of a 2nd rounder.
I'm talking about the oft injure one...my bad.Connor Brown ? If we can get a 2nd + for him ... go for it
I'm talking about the oft injure one...my bad.
Ok ... IMO keep Logan see what we have ... move Connor for a 2nd and the throw ins
Imagine thinking a 2nd is better than our leading scorer.
logan brown is not a lost soul hes not even done his second pro season. (both his pro seasons have been quite successful)I think CB for a second would be a solid return.
That said, I don't think LB has or will have the mettle to make the jump to the show. I would consider trading him for Jesse Puljujarvi although I could understand that's not a popular opinion. They are two lost souls on their respective teams. I worry that the fanbase is overvaluing the assets we have in the same regard as Ceci.
Anyway....this isn't the thread for that debate.
logan brown is not a lost soul hes not even done his second pro season. (both his pro seasons have been quite successful)
Here's another thought....would anyone trade our two top 10 picks for 1OA?
Stacked draft. Pundits think everyone in the top 10 ends up a player. Numbers kind of say someone in that top 10 flames out and amounts to nothing
I posted this before, I asked this exact question to a writer for a scouting magazine I follow on twitter. been following his stuff for a while and his colleagues stuff his answer was:Here's another thought....would anyone trade our two top 10 picks for 1OA?
Stacked draft. Pundits think everyone in the top 10 ends up a player. Numbers kind of say someone in that top 10 flames out and amounts to nothing
I think the big thing is that he's shown progress from one year to the next. Sure he still has some questions marks to resolve, but until he stops progressing I don't kow why anybody would start to worry about him as a prospect.
The problem Brown will have is if we draft a couple high end centers this year. Say we end up with Byfield and Lundell, or Rossi, that puts a lot of pressure on Brown particularly with Norris performing well. This draft will go a long way in stetting the stage for Brown. If we draft a couple wingers, he's got a clear path to be the #1 or #2 center. If we end up with a couple centers, things get crowded in a hurry.
I've been thinking about what phenoms Raymond and Holtz have been for Sweden, and yet they're not considered candidates for first overall, or likely even top three. I don't want to say that if they were Canadian they might go first, because clearly if a Swede is as good as Dahlin they can go first. But I do think they're being underrated a little by Canadian media and fans.
Since they were 13 or 14 they were breaking records every year for most points in their age group in a given league. Particularly Holtz early on, but by 16 Raymond had caught up and then surpassed him.
Based on the 2001 age group, there was no way Sweden should have come anywhere close to a silver at Hlinkas or gold at U18s last year. Their D was stacked, yes, but the offense would have been anemic. But underaged Raymond and Holtz played on the first line and led them to the silver and gold - and it's not just that they were the first line, there was times that it felt like they played every other shift.
Raymond drove possession most of the time, both because offensively he carried the puck and made plays, and defensively he was relentless in his pursuit to regain posseasion. But Holtz was always there to capitalize. They were dominant against most teams, but even the games against Canada when they were outmatched against bigger, older, highly skilled players, that was when Raymond in particular really shone. Forget about everything he did off the puck; just when Sweden couldn't get anything going for a long stretch, suddenly Raymond would work some magic and create something out of nothing.
The thing that makes this draft class special is that there are elite prospects coming from all over the world. Often North America will have a big year while Europe has a down year, or vice versa, but this year they're coming from all over. It is making for some interesting questions regarding prospects dominating junior vs. being effective in top pro leagues (vs. being impact players in lesser pro leagues).
Lundell or Rossi?
Raymond, Byfield or Stützle?
Holtz, Amirov, Perfetti or Quinn?
not even close, it's more like:With the NYI pick, Ottawa selects North Dakota committed Jake Sanderson.
With the NYI pick, Ottawa selects North Dakota committed Jake Sanderson.
danielpalfredsson said:Beautiful.
noHere's another thought....would anyone trade our two top 10 picks for 1OA?
Stacked draft. Pundits think everyone in the top 10 ends up a player. Numbers kind of say someone in that top 10 flames out and amounts to nothing
I'd imagine Mavrik Bourque becomes a high % pick now
I think the big thing is that he's shown progress from one year to the next. Sure he still has some questions marks to resolve, but until he stops progressing I don't kow why anybody would start to worry about him as a prospect.
The problem Brown will have is if we draft a couple high end centers this year. Say we end up with Byfield and Lundell, or Rossi, that puts a lot of pressure on Brown particularly with Norris performing well. This draft will go a long way in stetting the stage for Brown. If we draft a couple wingers, he's got a clear path to be the #1 or #2 center. If we end up with a couple centers, things get crowded in a hurry.