So Goligoski has L.A. on his no trade list. Newsflash - the Kings wouldnt want him.
Limited NTCs can be an interesting mix of "hard no" and "my mind could be changed if you signed me to an immediate extension." We saw last summer that Justin Faulk had Anaheim on his partial NTC but his agent negotiated an extension with them that didn't come to fruition, so Faulk blocked the trade and he was dealt to St. Louis. Blake already publicly said they'll be looking to add a veteran LHD to the mix, so I could imagine Goligoski/his agent figuring them as a possible landing spot. As an exercise, listing out the teams into three buckets and bolded Goligoski's 8 team NTC:
Unlikely (limited cap space and/or LD not a priority)
--------------------------------------
Anaheim|Vegas|St. Louis|Tampa|Toronto
Columbus|Carolina|Chicago|Philadephia|Nashville
NY Islanders|
Montreal|
Edmonton|Minnesota|San Jose
Vancouver|Colorado|Pittsburgh
Maybe (some cap space plus need for LD)
-----------------------------------------
Washington|Boston|NY Rangers|Dallas|
Winnipeg
Calgary|
Buffalo
Probably (cap space plus need for LD)
------------------------------------------------
Los Angeles|New Jersey|
Detroit|
Ottawa|Florida
Unfortunately the article on Goligoski is behind a paywall, so I'm not sure if the author elaborated on Goligoski's mindset. Since he's 35 with a couple young kids, I could imagine that he's not thrilled with the idea of moving twice in a year in this current climate. We saw recently that Eric Staal used his limited NTC to list teams that he thought would want to trade for him rather teams he wanted to avoid, since his intention was to stay in Minnesota where he was building (already built?) his retirement home. He and his agent miscalculated and didn't list Buffalo since they didn't think they'd be interested.