Comparing Formenton to Charles Barkley would be (in your words) a strange, strange comparison.
Comparing two fast left wing hockey players is not a strange strange comparison. One might have a better shot than the other, one might make plays better than the other but they are both trying to do the same thing.
Explain to me what's so different between Formenton and Connor. Is it that Connor carries the puck up the ice more? Is it that Formenton hits more?
We haven't even seen what Formenton can do in the NHL. No one thought Formenton would have such a good rookie year in the AHL but he did. Why is it so crazy to compare him to a rising star left winger? Some people might think Formenton is also tracking in that direction.
Kyle Connor has been a prolific scoring, skilled winger at every level since he was 15. He’s scored more goals in the NHL in each of the last 3 seasons than Formenton ever has going all the way back to bantam.
Formenton is a big bodied, fast skater who isn’t known for his offence, and likely will never be a prolific scorer in the NHL. Kyle Connor was a point per game, 40 goal guy this season. Neither is ever remotely likely for Formenton at any point in the NHL.
What’s different about Connor
-Already a 3 time 30 gaol scorer in NHL. Formenton has never hit 30 in any league (pro rated he would have)
- Point per game player in NHL at 22.
- Better shot.
- Weapon on the PP as the QB
- Better offensive instincts
- Better goal scoring
- Better vision
- Better offensive pedigree as a prospect
- Worse skating (Connor was never known for his skating, Formenton is one of the best skating prospects in the league)
- Different play style
There is really not much in common in either guy, which is why it’s a strange, strange comparison.
Formenton is going to be a great, great player for us, but it’s not because he’s going to be a prolific 30 goal, point per game guy like Connor is. He’s a different type of player who will be playing in different situations.