KopitarFAN
Reno Sucks!
so basically are we wanting a Vilardi replacement?
If want to look at it that way, but as we learned with Kopitar - Carter - Richards etc it takes strength down the middle to win.
so basically are we wanting a Vilardi replacement?
for sure. Just sucks that vilardi is not looking good to be one of those centersIf want to look at it that way, but as we learned with Kopitar - Carter - Richards etc it takes strength down the middle to win.
for sure. Just sucks that vilardi is not looking good to be one of those centers
Of course, but on the off chance that he does somehow get healthy, Vilardi & Dach/Cozens/Hughes is a good problem to have.
Does the euro countries do something like this where we get to see prospects against each other there also or is it just the tournaments like WJCs
Bob Mckenzie's mid-year rankings are out.
https://www.tsn.ca/it-s-still-the-jack-hughes-draft-1.1246625
His Top 3 remain unchanged (Hughes, Kakko, Podkolzin).
I have a few disagreements with this list, but not bad. Overall, I think Turcotte, Krebs, and Kaliyev are too low. Broberg, Byram, and Suzuki are too high.
Byram? Really? I think he could turn out to be the best player in the draft.
Cozens seems like a better pick than Dach to me. Better skater and goal scorer.
So, if not Hughes than Kakko. If not Kakko than who?
Basically if LA's picking #3, who should they pick? Having not seen many of them play, and just looking at the numbers and scouting report, I'd be looking at Cozens. Hate to draft out of need, but damn does LA need scorers.
Well the consensus among the scouts that Bob Mckenzie talked to is that #3 is Podkolzin, #4 is Dach and #5 is Cozens.
Unfortunately I'd agree no Russians. If were 3rd might as well trade back to 5 and get another assetYeah, I do like the idea of LA drafting a potential #1-2 Center, which Dach/Cozens seem to look like. Dach's game is a little too similar to Kopitar, which is why I'm leaning towards Cozens.
I'd like to avoid drafting a Russian with our top 5 pick, just haven't had the best luck in bringing them over.
I tend to agree. After the Vilardi pick the Kings need as many almost sure things as they can get in the draft. If the Kings have the 3rd overall, trading back to somewhere between 5th - 8th overall, and getting a good prospect or a 1st round pick in 2020 wouldn't be a bad idea.Unfortunately I'd agree no Russians. If were 3rd might as well trade back to 5 and get another asset
It's not even that for me it's just the difficulty in signing them and then their success once their here. Zhitnik, Frolov, and Voynov were our best Russians and all ended poorly. Porkins has been a forever never signed same with Big Dergy.We might have an easier time signing a Russian pick once Willie D is gone, since Kovalchuk is with the Kings. They might want a chance to play with him.
I think 3rd oa for 5-8th oa and a 2020 2nd would be fair.I tend to agree. After the Vilardi pick the Kings need as many almost sure things as they can get in the draft. If the Kings have the 3rd overall, trading back to somewhere between 5th - 8th overall, and getting a good prospect or a 1st round pick in 2020 wouldn't be a bad idea.
The 2020 draft is supposed to be a good one, so having an additional 1st round pick in that draft would be a solid move.
So, if not Hughes than Kakko. If not Kakko than who?
Basically if LA's picking #3, who should they pick? Having not seen many of them play, and just looking at the numbers and scouting report, I'd be looking at Cozens. Hate to draft out of need, but damn does LA need scorers.
I don't think I like just getting a 2nd round pick + the 5th - 8th OA is enough for the 3rd OA.I think 3rd oa for 5-8th oa and a 2020 2nd would be fair.