2019/20 Roster Thread XXXVIII

Status
Not open for further replies.

CapnZin

Registered User
Jul 20, 2017
4,669
6,209
Sweden
FLyers don't need to add physical forwards to the bottom six, they have plenty:

NAK 5'11 211
Bunnaman 6'3 226
Lindblom 6'1 200
Raffl 6'0 210
Patrick 6'2 203
Twarynski 6'2 206
Sandin 6'1 209

If Braun and Hagg leave, they could use another full bodied defenseman.
The 6’3 185 Sanheim, 6’1 201 Provorov, 6’5 215 Myers, 6’1 203 Niskanen, 5’11 180/185 Ghost and Friedman aren’t full bodied?
 

BiggE

SELL THE DAMN TEAM
Jan 4, 2019
25,139
65,961
Somewhere, FL
I am basically the only one who is vocally critical of him all the time, so I don't know who you think you are talking to :laugh: And no, I didn't want Duchene either - if you'll recall (you won't), I thought we weren't ready to make a push yet and should wait for Frost et al to be ready. Also, I am always against UFA signings as long as we are drafting well.
I didn’t want either of them, nor JVR too. But oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Dave Poulin

Benji007

Registered User
Jun 7, 2018
37
41
I don't understand why they'd move Ghost. To me, that's only if you absolutely have to.

1. Braun is UFA and won't be resigned.
2. Ghost at least provides you with options for the ED if you want to steer the Kraken towards that vs. some other player.
3. Ghost *is* an NHL defenseman. Period. We need an NHL defenseman.

The cap space can come by trading JVR. I like him, he's probably good for 25+ goals, but it's becoming harder and harder to see where he fits on this team, especially with younger, cheaper, and hungrier talent in the system.

Is the SCF over yet? There should be a simulate games option once your team is out. :laugh:

I'd push to move JVR as well even if I have to over pay to move him. Personally I'd rather over pay to move JVR than move Ghost for a 2nd and cap relief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flyersnorth

flyerslducks

Registered User
Feb 15, 2017
12,751
13,609
Why would we "pay" to remove a 25g+25a forward when we have issue scoring goals?

Here is an idea....DRESS 4 lines that can actually produce instead of putting all the burden onto 2 lines while 2 other lines hold on for dear life every game.
amen brother. No team is as deep as the flyers when fully healthy and this is without Patrick. We can have the best 4th line in hockey in raffl-laughton-nak. AV's system would kill if we roll the correct lines. He loves to balance and roll 4 lines a lot and it could* work if we don't have holes..which we shouldn't unless we resign a ballsack
 
  • Like
Reactions: Curufinwe

landsbergfan

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
6,813
24,262
You aren't getting rid of JVR without taking on money or paying a high pick. There is no shot right now.

Him being selected by Seattle is the absolute best case scenario for this team. All that is needed to make that happen is to use him properly.
 

BrindamoursNose

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
20,410
14,559
You aren't getting rid of JVR without taking on money or paying a high pick. There is no shot right now.

Him being selected by Seattle is the absolute best case scenario for this team. All that is needed to make that happen is to use him properly.

That's just not true. He's still got value. You just may not get a lot back necessarily.
 

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,345
157,047
Pennsylvania
Bump...

Just to go further into this, for people who want JVR gone but want to give up assets for Laine...

Stat
JVR
(past 3 years)
Laine
(past 3 years)
JVR
(last season)
Laine
(last season)
Total games2132326668
Total goals/601.501.501.161.27
Total points/602.592.692.442.86
Total ixG/601.290.951.100.93
5v5 CF% (rel)51.29 (+2.16)47.37 (-3.32)52.95 (+2.06)46.90 (-2.42)
5v5 xGF% (rel)52.46 (+3.86)44.29 (-5.24)55.60 (+6.81)42.62 (-1.88)
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
I'll keep JVR, those assets, and the cap room. Thanks.
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,169
125,713
Why would we "pay" to remove a 25g+25a forward when we have issue scoring goals?

Here is an idea....DRESS 4 lines that can actually produce instead of putting all the burden onto 2 lines while 2 other lines hold on for dear life every game.

THIS!

We got practically nothing out of the bottom 6 in the Playoffs.
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
57,003
45,439
Why would we "pay" to remove a 25g+25a forward when we have issue scoring goals?

Here is an idea....DRESS 4 lines that can actually produce instead of putting all the burden onto 2 lines while 2 other lines hold on for dear life every game.

If we get rid of JVR, we might be able to get a winger who scored 55 points per 82 games in the past two seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tripod

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,169
125,713
Let's see JVR with either Frost or Patrick as his Center and a defensively responsible RWer like NAK or maybe even Lindblom before we banish him.

I'd actually rather trade Laughton than JVR*

Giroux - Couturier - Voracek
Farabee - Hayes - Konecny
JVR - Frost/Patrick - Lindblom
Raffl - Patrick/Frost - NAK

Sandin, Tanner

*if Patty isn't good to go, then you hold onto Laughton.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad