RememberTheRoar
“I’m not as worried about the 5-on-5 scoring.”
C over F is not drafting BPA though.
I’m assuming he meant if you deem BPA to be a tie between two players.
C over F is not drafting BPA though.
I’m assuming he meant if you deem BPA to be a tie between two players.
Woah woah woah!You guys promised me a compliance clause would be included in the next CBA after my Seabrook / Keith trade cap rant. If one does not come, I'll find every one of you with a flame thrower. You have been warned.
Woah woah woah!
I said thay there would be one only if the cap went down!
C over F is not drafting BPA though.
You could of just stuck with what actually happened in Ovi over Malkin.If a W is rated slightly higher than a C and the C is basically guaranteed to be a #1C, I would still take the C.
Like say, if I had to choose between Crosby and Ovechkin in their draft year, I would take Crosby even if Ovi was rated slightly higher.
If you ignore that there was a sizable diifference in the two when it came to who was the consensus #1 in their draft year, yeah, I would have.You could of just stuck with what actually happened in Ovi over Malkin.
But would you of taken Malkin instead?
Saad-Toews-Kahun
Panarin-Strome-Kane
Debrincat-Caiggula-Sikura
Perlini-Kampf-Hayden
Martinsen
Jokiharju-Keith
Gus-Murphy
Forsling-Dahlstrom
Seabrook
Smith/Delia...Crawford
Panarin is an obvious fit with Kane
Smith would be a good mentor to help Delia transition into being a #1 goalie
Boqvist, Beaudin, Mitchell and our first round picks in 2019 can knock on the door too.
It went down with the last CBA and that's the only precedent we have to go on really. Who f***in knows what's going to happen but my thinking has been that if the cap goes down there will be compliance buyouts 100%.Wait, is there talk of one not being included? Also, highly unlikely the cap is going down, but I guess anything could happen.
for me, while many posters have posted the idea of getting the like of Pan and other FA to help the team, i say no. the reason is, with 2 possible contracts that may not move, the team should look at a FA who the org will consider as a tier 2 offensive FA's and defensive top defense man.
while you make a good point, the team needs to address the hole on the defensive side..... those kids need time to continue to develop. hence my idea of acquiring a defense man to help the timeline.Pass on EK. Bet on kids in pipeline and address need at forward. We need Panarin or Stone badly. Hopefully add another in draft that can play next year (probably requires top 5 pick). Maybe trade for another top 9 guy from a team in cap crunch like others suggested with J.T Miller.
while you make a good point, the team needs to address the hole on the defensive side..... those kids need time to continue to develop. hence my idea of acquiring a defense man to help the timeline.
while you make a good point, the team needs to address the hole on the defensive side..... those kids need time to continue to develop. hence my idea of acquiring a defense man to help the timeline.
you got me there. i am not update on whom to get. my slow mind can not work that fast.Agreed. What about Edler? He’s a UFA. Maybe could get him on a 3 year deal to bridge the gap.
you got me there. i am not update on whom to get. my slow mind can not work that fast.
you got me there. i am not update on whom to get. my slow mind can not work that fast.
a 2 yr deal will be idea or trade ...... this team needs a stop gap temp experience d-men to help ease the young studs coming up.Outside of Karlsson and Gardiner, he’s the only other free agent that sticks out. Good all around D-man, good on the PP, physical, blocks a lot of shots. Also a LHD. Will be 33 in April so maybe 2 or 3 years gets it done.
But yeah, if we are going to try to start winning next year, I agree we need to make a trade or sign a veteran D-man.
a 2 yr deal will be idea or trade ...... this team needs a stop gap temp experience d-men to help ease the young studs coming up.
We have Gardiner at 1.2m per. His name is Erik Gustafsson.