Satans Hockey
Registered User
- Nov 17, 2010
- 8,746
- 10,417
What talent us coming up? Who should we look for next year?Without doubt the weakest NT Denmark has had in the last decade. More talent coming up, but the next Ehlers is at least 3 years away. Expected to get relegated this year so overall Im very satisfied.
What talent us coming up? Who should we look for next year?
Without doubt the weakest NT Denmark has had in the last decade. More talent coming up, but the next Ehlers is at least 3 years away. Expected to get relegated this year so overall Im very satisfied.
I had the same feeling. Actually the team could be better next year due to the many returning 1999 class players from this year The defence looks good for next year, but perhaps we will lack a bit of high end firepower.
I had a sneaking suspicion that Belarus was going to have a hard time making up ~2cm and ~2.5 kg. They were more skilled but...it happens.
It's a real shame TSN would rather show a repeat of a dumb QF than show two nations fighting for their place in the tournament.
They also return Malte Setkov. They'll maybe add a guy named Brondberg too, he's like Rondberg but with the B which indicates he's a real bro in Danish.Have a soft spot for Denmark so I'm happy they're back next year. Just looking at the best players from these teams however it's probably unfortunate for the tournament next year as it appears Belarus may be stronger than Denmark next year with only Rondberg back from Denmark's best guys while Shusko, Yeryomenko, Martynov, Drozdov etc could be back for Belarus. With Kazakhstan looking rather weak next year as well the likely group stage result will probably see Denmark v. Kazakhstan in relegation pretty easily. But we'll see how they develop in the next year, hopefully Denmark puts a scare into someone again.
What talent us coming up? Who should we look for next year?
I was blown away when TSN was talking about how Denmark only has 16 covered sheets of ice in the entire country. Is that true? I could drive less than an hour and find at least double that and I live in the middle of one of the lowest populated areas in southern Canada. That's an incredible stat, if true, and actually a real credit to the Danish system to be able to produce competitive teams with so few rinks.
I think we have 26 rinks in the country, but what they probably are referring to are the number of places where there are a rink. Most teams in the best league has two rinks to meet the demands for icetime for all the youth that wants to play. Many rural towns with a population above 50k doesnt have some ice to skate on, resulting in that it is limited for the few that lives in proximity to a rink. Or with some parents that are willing and have the capability to drive their kids. As it is now, there are youngsters on waitinglists just to start playing, but the local governments has limited cash to spend, so it will often be a choice between a rink or maybe a multisport arena where you can play a larger variety of sports.
My hope has always been that Denmark comes out strong on home ice in may when the WCH is being played. Maybe there will be some mayors asking themselves why their city doesnt have a rink or maybe a public demand that more kids should be able to play.
I had a sneaking suspicion they were going to avoid relegation. They didn't look great in pool play but they also played in a much more difficult group.