If its so blazing hot, where did you have Miller and Lundkvist ranked pre-draft?
Fans always overestimate prospects. There are people here who claim that Lias Andersson could be a #1 center. Most neutral observers have him as a #2 or #3 center. I don't think I've once seen any neutral observer say he has a first line ceiling. Rangers fans rationalized the pick by saying he had Selke potential and all that. It was scoffed at here when a neutral observer who observes prospects for a living said that Howden would only be a good third line forward.
Pionk is at least an average top 4 defensemen, unless his normal form is nothing like what he showed in 28 games. Not every first round defensemen has a realistic first pairing ceiling. Not every defensemen who is picked in the first round ends up as a top 4 defensemen. Chances are most actually won't. If you think I'm wrong, go back and check. Look from lets say the 2008-2012 drafts. Look at what percentage are top 4 NHL D.
And I do think lower of the two defensemen than the Rangers, but that doesn't even matter. Statistically speaking, most first round picks are not top 4 defensemen, and I'm sure the number is even lower in the lower 1/3 of the first round.
Edit: I went back and checked this myself. 54 defensemen picked in those years. I counted 27 top 4 D. So about 50%. And I think I was very generous in my top 4 designations. Among those picked in the lower third of the first round, with the most generous designations, 5 of 14 are top 4 D. So I think what I said is correct. I think most just don't realize. But I also find it stupid to put Pionk on a prospect list. He doesn't belong on a list with junior hockey players when he was playing 20+ minutes in the NHL last season.