They are taking the best D available. And Lipanov played himself out of a roster spot.Thought on what exactly they are doing with their D?
Also surprised Lipanov got cut. Thought theyd play the chemistry route w Svechnikov
Bragin is the one coach who consistently makes the right calls, and I'm saying this as a Canadian. I don't think the Russians medal this year, but it'll be due to a weaker team than usual, not due to team's cuts. Smaller ice, Canada and US very strong and deep, Finland's got a really strong team, and the Swedes are strong as usual (which means a 4th place finish btw, as usual). Gonna be hard for the Russians to get past whomever finished 3rd in Group A in the quarters (assuming the Swedes win Group B as they always do). Last year the Russians had Kaprizov and Samsonov. They've got some good players this year, but the other teams just seem much stronger than them.
Bragin is the one coach who consistently makes the right calls, and I'm saying this as a Canadian. I don't think the Russians medal this year, but it'll be due to a weaker team than usual, not due to team's cuts. Smaller ice, Canada and US very strong and deep, Finland's got a really strong team, and the Swedes are strong as usual (which means a 4th place finish btw, as usual). Gonna be hard for the Russians to get past whomever finished 3rd in Group A in the quarters (assuming the Swedes win Group B as they always do). Last year the Russians had Kaprizov and Samsonov. They've got some good players this year, but the other teams just seem much stronger than them.
What does the Russian defense look like? Also does anyone know who will be quarterbacking the powerplay?
If by "the 4th place prediction", you're referring to my post, I never meant to say they'll finish 4th. I think they're gonna get knocked out in the quarters to either Finland or the US, which would put them at 5th.
My predictions:
1. Canada
2. US - exactly the opposite of last year, including the losing in the finals on home soil.
3. Finland
4. Sweden
5. Russia
The KHL factor helped them a lot last year, but that factor could also have been called the "Kaprizov" factor. They have no one as good as him this year (although to be fair, no other team does as well!). I think the KHL guys will be their top guys, but it won't be anywhere near enough.
The Russians have the unknown factor. The KHL guys could come out and rip up the tournament.
They’ll look rather blah in the preliminaries and then turn it up in the quarters. It’s just how they roll.
They’ll look rather blah in the preliminaries and then turn it up in the quarters. It’s just how they roll.
Abramov-Rubtsov-Svechnikov
My opinion is this birth year is super weak
Like it or not, many of them moved to play in NA since then. Now they are being called super weak.The 98’s won the U 17’s and were favoured to win the U 18’s before the doping fiasco. Are they really considered “super weak”?
I don't really think Russia is going through a six year stretch without putting out a good team or a handful of elite players. Infrastructure issues or not, talent is talent.I think the team will eventually gel (as they always do) and hit their best stride, but certainly concerned it might not be good enough.
If you guys remember, drunk Bragin last year said this team is doomed because their best player is Rubtsov. haha
My opinion is this birth year is super weak for obvious demographic reasons, and most of these kids started their hockey life during tough early and mid 2000's when corruption was way more rampant than now, and the newer KHL backed infrastructure wasn't even on the map yet. By my calculations, it won't be until atleast 2024 that we will see a first really solid all-around team with a couple of talents that we all dream of.