Vilardi dropped like a rock last year, but you know better, right?
Kopitar dropped like a rock in 2005, but you know better, right?
The Kings have drafted three impact forwards in a decade, one of which they traded away. If you think that’s a stellar drafting record, congrats, your Kings homer glasses will arrive in the mail next week.
Maybe so, seems like a lot of guys around 5-10 to 5-11 are going early.They have to actually make the NHL. Rasmus Dahlin is going to end up being 6'3"-6'4" 220+ when he fills out. Most of the D picked early are all over 6'0" and going to be 200+ pounds.
Why exactly are we calling the guy we picked "taking a swing"? He was ranked 20 and we picked him at 20...
just went back and listed to Sportsnets panel talking about Kupari and they claimed he could score from the outside and he has a wicked shot contrary to what was posted on here earlier. Can anyone clarify ?
Going 11th isn't really dropping like a rock.Vilardi dropped like a rock last year, but you know better, right?
Kopitar dropped like a rock in 2005, but you know better, right?
The Kings have drafted three impact forwards in a decade, one of which they traded away. If you think that’s a stellar drafting record, congrats, your Kings homer glasses will arrive in the mail next week.
just went back and listed to Sportsnets panel talking about Kupari and they claimed he could score from the outside and he has a wicked shot contrary to what was posted on here earlier. Can anyone clarify ?
Watching his highlights, his wrist shot does not look as bad as it's been made out to be.
just went back and listed to Sportsnets panel talking about Kupari and they claimed he could score from the outside and he has a wicked shot contrary to what was posted on here earlier. Can anyone clarify ?
Kings take a shot at speed and skill and high upside and are getting crapped on for not taking the 'safe' player after months and months of complaining that they need speed and skill and less 'safe' players.
This board has become ****ing unbearable and sadly predictable.
Look at his numbers.
Look at his numbers.
That's asinine.
2009 - Schenn, Clifford, Nolan, Deslauriers, all NHL players
2010 - 5 picks....Forbort, Toffoli, Weal, Gravel, 4 NHL players
2011 - Andreof, Shore - NHL players, will give you this one though, wasn't a "great" draft but didn't have a #1
2012 - Pearson, Ladue, Miller - NHL players
2013 - Zykov, Brodzinkski, possible NHL players,
2014 - Kempe, Amadio, McKeown, NHL players or possiblity, not sure if McKeown can stick with Carolina
2015 - 6 picks, too soon too tell
2016 - Clague, the next Doughty apparently, 4 picks total
2017 - Vilardi, next Kopitar, JAD etc,
To say it's been absymal is just ignoring the facts.
Also with the way the roster is, wouldn't it be nice to take a gamble ?
We didn't have many picks in 15' and 16', especially firsts, correct?
His lower league numbers are also not eye opening for a reason folks. Read the actual scouting report on him from multiply sources.
I'd call that working within the constraints of the system and limited ability to predict the future. When something is ranked according to all available criteria and is selected according to his ranking, I wouldn't call that swinging.Because the back half of the 1st round is always a crap shoot. Some teams pick safe guys that have bottom six skill sets. Others did what the Kings just did. Pick a highly skilled kid that probably will never develop a bottom six skill set. But he has tremendous other attributes. That's a boom or bust pick.
Haven't you been reading the boards? But agree that it's too soon to say, but to say the Kings have drafted absymally since 2008 is asinine and idiotic.
Veleno has dropped like a rock in this draft, and somewhere...there's a reason......but you know better...right?